Originally Posted by
j2k4
From the article:
"Time magazine reported last October that he had been the one to personally wield the knife that killed the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl."
I believe any reasonable person would agree that qualifies as a "mention".
A 'mention', which is actually an 'accusation', has nothing whatsoever to do with a 'confession'. It also has nothing to do with my post, in which I said,
".. there was no mention in that article of him confessing to the murder of Pearl"
Originally Posted by
j2k4
In any case, it is part of the story, and his admission to this act (which was mentioned in every medium I saw today) seems genuine in all respects.
As I said, the story of his confession to killing Pearl came later, it wasn't in the original story, and it certainly wasn't in the story I posted, the first to hit the net.
Originally Posted by
j2k4
You gave it a miss, and the why of that is plain.
I rest my case.
I didn't 'give it a miss', it wasn't there! No matter how much you squirm, you were wrong, again.
So, once again you aren't man enough to admit you were wrong ... typical!
As usual, you waded in with your personal agenda, not bothering to check your facts, just like the bogus Quran story.
No wonder they made you a mod, you'll be creeping back and changing your posts next.
I rest my case.
Bookmarks