124 Reasons

[hypoluxa3k]

hey, who 'cut and paste'-d?
not me...BTW, is this true:

"11. Cut federal spending on libraries by $39 million. "

that's bad.

suckers.

sorry.

bye.

[j2k4]

Originally posted by hypoluxa3k@7 July 2003 - 09:22
hey, who 'cut and paste'-d?
not me...BTW, is this true:

"11. Cut federal spending on libraries by $39 million. "

that's bad.    

suckers.

sorry.

bye.

Okay, lets start there-

Hypoluxa, libraries are great, essential and, well, downright beneficial to the lives of our citizens.

I stand in support of them unequivocally.

But you know what?

If I'm running the show, and you run a sloppy, irresponsible library program, I'm gonna whack you right where I'll get your attention; in your budget.

Now, since I'm pretty sure you've never been to a library in the U.S., and hence know absolutely nothing about the amenities provided therein, and, though you claim to know the amount of money cut from the national library budget, you haven't the slightest idea of what we do spend on libraries, your relevant knowledge is roughly zero.

Bottom line:

You, who are ignorant, have allowed a wee bit of knowledge to misle you.

Sucker.


P.S.

Liam-I will not so answer 123 more of his putrid morsels.

[TheDave]

sorry these words are confusing but is j2k4 trying to sidestep around lamsey asking for one point in bush's favour?

if you cant do it j2k4 why do you support bush?

here, i think ive got a theory cos everytime someone not regular to the news room leaves a comment you immediatly put it down. if you want your own forum go get one and stop trying to control this one

[j2k4]

Originally posted by TheDave@7 July 2003 - 10:45
sorry these words are confusing but is j2k4 trying to sidestep around lamsey asking for one point in bush's favour?

if you cant do it j2k4 why do you support bush?

here, i think ive got a theory cos everytime someone not regular to the news room leaves a comment you immediatly put it down. if you want your own forum go get one and stop trying to control this one

I'm not putting anybody down, Dave, but I have noticed a trend:

In the face of logic, the chronic complainers tend to scatter.

If you consider being corrected a put-down, then I have no help for you.

That is to say, don't come to a gunfight with only a knife, or, worse yet, an amorphous collection of cut-and-paste "facts".

If you are wrong, admit it; I shall do the same.

This in lieu of agreeing to disagree.

Oh, and just so I'm not side-stepping Liam:

I, j2k4, hereby firmly state my belief George Walker Bush is doing an excellent overall job on foreign policy, and I therefore support him.

What you think of it, I'm sure, is something else, but you know what?

The only thing you can rightly claim is to have an opposing opinion, as "facts" are so easily thrown around, yes?

So, you state your "facts", and I'll state mine-let the reader be the judge.

I will never call you a bad name as long as you state your opinion.

[TheDave]

lol. you didnt even try and make something up you just said you support his foriegn policy without any reason for your arguement. at least we put reasons some maybe exagerated but they almost all have a truth

[j2k4]

Originally posted by TheDave@7 July 2003 - 11:38
you didnt even try and make something up

And here are the key words in your post, Dave.

You are hoist on your own petard.

[TheDave]

oops i didnt realise how that sounded. what i meant was you didnt put even the smallest thing or a half-truth. ive learnt what im presuming is the lorrals, morals whatever as you; dont lie to prove a point cos itll look 1000 times worse than admitting your mistakes

[j2k4]

Originally posted by TheDave@7 July 2003 - 11:50
oops i didnt realise how that sounded. what i meant was you didnt put even the smallest thing or a half-truth. ive learnt what im presuming is the lorrals, morals whatever as you; dont lie to prove a point cos itll look 1000 times worse than admitting your mistakes

I'll assume your post doesn't contain an accusation that I have lied.

Let's see-

I support George Bush's aid program to fight AIDS in Africa.

Will that suffice?

[TheDave]

i didnt accuse you of lying.
and that comment made me realise you dont hear about that on the news

ill have to look it up, but im still opposed to bush

[Lamsey]

Originally posted by j2k4@7 July 2003 - 17:55
I support George Bush's aid program to fight AIDS in Africa.

That's very good of him. He's spending $200 million, which is brilliant.

He's also expected to spend $250 million on his own re-election campaign...

Priorities?