Comparison of what, waffles and stmusic

[civeta]

Look at these stats for waffle:Registered users2,262 Torrents13,561
If waffle had 40,000 invited users how many torrent do you think waffle would have? Yeahhhh... I think this thread and that kid is getting out of hand.

[Submission]

what do you think would happen if stmusic had 200,000 users like oink.

[IceTee]

what do you think would happen if stmusic had 200,000 users like oink.

You have an "argument dysfunction"
Every1 of your remarks on this thread made no sense...

I think it's a good thing for a member to defend the tracker he's using but not with insults and childish remarks and most of all... not bringing other trackers down when.... you're defending a tracker that !!! is not being attacked !!!
I don't think that Stmusic staff members would like what you're doing here...

But let's just see your last reply:

STmusic:
Registered users: 42,659
Torrents: 24,099

> 42,659 x 5 = (+/-) 200,000 users
> 24,099 x 5 = (+/-) 120,495 torrents

Waffle:
Registered users: 2,142 users
Torrents: 24,000 torrents

> 2,142 x 100,000 = (+/-) 200,000 users
> 24,099 x 100,000 = (+/-) 2,409,900,000 torrents2,409,900,000 torrents > 120,495 torrents

By what you're saying, If both trackers went up to 200,00 users, like Oink, Waffle would be bigger than STmusi. (20,000 times bigger)



Stop bad-mouthing the new trackers and help this community grow.

[Actatoi]

Text

Thank you, you just posted exactly my thoughts however I were too lazy to write them down. I second IceTees post.

[Submission]

you missed my point. Waffles doesn't have 40,000 users. Both trackers would have more torrents with more users. Its like saying if I was rich i'd be rich.

Question is how did waffles get their torrents? Automated seedbox uploads, since there is so many scene releases you are looking at about 14,000 torrents +/- 1000.

[LOBO210]

dude i'm totally new but from my understanding Waffles is pred to be bigger than all... Correct me if i'm wrong and why

[civeta]

you missed my point. Waffles doesn't have 40,000 users. Both trackers would have more torrents with more users. Its like saying if I was rich i'd be rich.

Question is how did waffles get their torrents? Automated seedbox uploads, since there is so many scene releases you are looking at about 14,000 torrents +/- 1000.

Prove to me that it's automated seedbox uploads. I know I've uploaded ~35 torrents personally to waffles. And just for the record, I don't have anything against STMusic and was a previous member. But what submission is doing to promote STMusic is wrong. Waffles nor What.cd degrades other trackers to bring attention to their own. Keep this bias bullshit to yourself.

[Submission]

Facts are bullshit?

Im only reiterating real statistics.

You are the one with bias desperately attempting to keep what.cd alive when it has no support.

Why do you think they gave everyone 10gb? Everyone's a power user now and the fact that they gave 10gb to everyone is really the demise of the site, now no one has a reason to upload. 10gb of music is alot and it took a while for me to download 10gb from oink.

It will be months before people use up 10gb and decide to upload, and from now up to that point, stmusic will grow with user uploads, meaning stuff you probably wont find anywhere else.

[civeta]

First of all, I am not trying to keep anything alive nor put a tracker to death. I understand you really do like stmusic and are dedicated to promoting it, but I do not agree with the way you are doing it. I don't care if you want to get the word out that STMusic is growing, but again, don't put other trackers down. I am not here defending a site and it's future, I'm just asking that you not make it seem like STMusic is better than every other tracker by negatively commenting about them. I'm not going to argue this anymore, so continue to do what you do kid.

[Submission]

what and waffles are small, I'm only reiterating the facts, if you dont like the facts then dont comment on whats better.