inactivity pruning sucks

[J-dye]

i think 40 days is long time too at least once log in (in that time),if u cant do that then why useing private sites

if pruning sucks then there are good news for u,start useing public sites and u will never have to worry abouth pruning

i was disabled from x264.eu , since its not a 0day tracker i dont need to use the site frequently . i can understand if you are disabled for inactivity from a 0day tracker but specialised trackers like these should give the users a second chance or something similar.

what pisses me off is that i seeded everything i have downloaded from that site for atleast 6 months

[singing_sol]

yeah my what acc's gone

[Saroman]

I havent read all the comments from Page 1 but i think the mininum days for unparked account should be 2 months and for Parked account must be 4 months..

Although it sounds too long but for someone who cannot access it frequently.. Its a decent buffer..

[BOOM]

I think its good because prevents collectors stay on tracker

[yayyyyyy]

Yeah... inactivity pruning sucks... a lot of ppl download just 100k each month and log in every week just to keep the accounts active...

it should be more stricter... like hdbits does: ban who NOT DOWNLOAD ENOUGH in a very short timeframe to make place for ppl that are going to REALLY use that account

[SAM]

I think its good because prevents collectors stay on tracker

nah the collectors will enter once in a while to make sure the account is safe.
what about the power user accounts these accounts should get longer period of time like 4 months or 3 not 42 days.

[5+4=9]

I agree with inactivity pruning... if you don't use it, you don't need it

[SAM]

one beer for master 9 here please and a joint