Apple keen to push Safari 3.1 on Windows users

[DasFox]

I already hate the fact that they forcibly package iTunes and Quicktime together as I stick to Quicktime Alternative for less bloatware.

They're just not offering options to users anymore...Kind of reminds me of Nero.

I thought you could get them separate, and if not you can always unpack them and take out whichever you want, that's what I always did before...

[Hairbautt]

I already hate the fact that they forcibly package iTunes and Quicktime together as I stick to Quicktime Alternative for less bloatware.

They're just not offering options to users anymore...Kind of reminds me of Nero.

I thought you could get them separate, and if not you can always unpack them and take out whichever you want, that's what I always did before...

Too much work and before you could get them seperate, but not anymore.

By the way, nicho, there's a Quicktime Alternative that excludes the bull.

I already hate the fact that they forcibly package iTunes and Quicktime together as I stick to Quicktime Alternative for less bloatware.

They're just not offering options to users anymore...Kind of reminds me of Nero.

I thought you could get them separate, and if not you can always unpack them and take out whichever you want, that's what I always did before...

Too much work and before you could get them seperate, but not anymore.

By the way, nicho, there's a Quicktime Alternative that excludes the bull and is still compatible with iTunes. And yea they could totally just include the req. codec in iTunes.

[MagusDraco]

The reason for bundling QT with iTunes is that all video content on ITMS uses QT technology.

They could include the quicktime codec with iTunes without having to include the whole quicktime program.

Aww but that'd be smart. And they can't give out the codec like that.


If nothing else it'd ruin quicktime alternative.