You're entitled to your opinion.
You're entitled to your opinion.
"I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg
Should I rather go for the Intel Core2 Quadro 9300?
Last edited by Vamp; 09-24-2008 at 04:08 PM.
9300 - if you have the extra bucks, sure. it runs cooler, more OC and has more cache. wont see a big diff though.
i also read that intel's nehalem will be much better for video stuff, but not games (http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/showpost.aspx?i=480)
nehalem will launch end of this year/next year so prices will fall for the prev. gen. stuff
maybe u should wait before the full upgrade
Skitt's Law: "any post correcting an error in another post will contain at least one error itself"
I own both 8400 and 6600 The 6600 on my main rig and the 8400 on the HTPC. True they are about the same but the wolfie has 1333 FSB instead of 1066 and can OC WAAAAY better , as previously said it's cooler and uses less juice(elec), so it has more advantages than the quad as of now. The 1366 nelhams that are coming out so the price will come down on the older stuff that IMHO is still fantastic so deff wait till at least Jan Feb to get anything.
Oh I'll be right there with you on a side note i read somewhere that the Apogee GTZ will have a bracket to support 1366 sockets maybe I'll be finished with the loop by then. Again you rock with the recomendations man!
MMMM enchiladas
I smiled reading this as that's the chip I have , in a year I'll by a new mobo , Cpu , ddr3 memory and new video card . I'll keep my case and PSU and start all over .
By the way that was not a dig as I read all the Overclockers boards and read about the new chips and ddr3 memory before my purchase of the Q6600 about 6 months ago . The ddr3 memory has a problem with multitasking ? WTF !
Last edited by peat moss; 09-25-2008 at 02:32 AM.
Bookmarks