Sct vs FTN

**Di@monds** · 10-28-2008, 09:29 PM

too OP use the fucking search button

**RedRansom** · 10-28-2008, 09:40 PM

Originally Posted by kukushka

Originally Posted by makkienator

SCT is better with speed, FTN is better cause it has no ratio, BUT TL is better than both (more files, more leechers/seeders, much easier to keep good ratio...), so get your conclusion.

oh rly? torrents: sct 22606, tti 20335, revtt 17502, scc 17207, tl.. hm... 15583
(yes, i know, there's no xxx on tl

and packs from sct/scc cannot be compared to tl.

and cannot compare the number of members 150k and ~15k or ~20k...
this mean seeder on old stuffs and at least you can find 10 seed on files

**ajsi** · 10-28-2008, 09:40 PM

why again?
somebody make that search button red

**BlueLabel** · 10-28-2008, 09:45 PM

Originally Posted by ajsi

why again?
somebody make that search button red

wont help
its happened before and it will happened in the future.
fst have to tag all *VS* thread

**PlayeR** · 10-29-2008, 02:06 AM

they just love to open new thread. to get attention.
well, at least they get my attention

**Detale** · 10-29-2008, 04:16 AM

Originally Posted by Di@monds

too OP use the fucking search button

Wow well that's real nice of you, Thanks for being such a kind helpful member here. Ease up a bit, consider this a warning.

To the Op in all honesty there's no simple answer, each have their points. Its a matter of taste really. Both are great sites with great staff.

**integral** · 10-29-2008, 04:43 AM

I see nothing really wrong with the thread.

As time goes on, tracker policy, staff, speeds, etc. all change. Referring to an older thread that has been closed due to flaming or silly useless posts (akin to Di@monds' post) sometimes does not suffice.

A healthy discussion about which tracker is better, minus limp unsupported fanboi statements and the equally lackluster 'ripostes' from other fanbois, is just what this forum needs, especially since the water from the BCG-HelpMePlz tsunami is finally receding.

**Presto** · 10-29-2008, 04:44 AM

Originally Posted by naikon

yeap, sct is good, but it hard to keep good ratio ( if you have upload less than 512kbps )

Then stop hit'n'running for a second. You might have 64kbps but you can do just fine @ ScT, it's not like it's FTN, where someone might leech from you once in every decade.

Originally Posted by integral

Originally Posted by colbert

FTN can't raise enough donations?! ScT doesn't seem to have that problem.

ScT doesn't have that problem since they have over 3x the users that FTN has, and also offer GBs of uploads and invites for donating.

ScT also doesn't have that problem, because ScT members give crap about their tracker. FTN is a gathering place for 3,000 inactive FST users, who keep their accounts only to have the bragging rights.

I am seriously looking forward to some actions from FTN's staff. This place has the potential to be something better than just another dry, gray and dull tracker.