m@D @n!m3
BT Rep: +1
in 1989 i didn't think to much of the punisher and then 2004 came. that one at the time did even less than the 1989 version. now, it's WAR ZONE! i mean, c'mon. i want a good version of this transition sumtime in my lifetime... seriously. hopefully, 3rd time's a charm?
The Punisher 1989 IMDb.
The Punisher 1989 LQ Trailer.
The Punisher 2004 IMDb.
The Punisher 2004 LQ Trailer.
Punisher: War Zone IMDb.
Punisher: War Zone 2008 HD Trailer.
Alamo Drafthouse!
Last Game Completed: Aliens: Colonial Marines (PC) 10-13-13
Now Playing: Paper Mario 64
Total Games Completed: 503
Poster
The 2004 punisher was "watchable" - this new one looks pretty crap indeed
I personally liked both of them.
I am your God
No the new one war zone is absolutely awesome, you must see the restricted trailer, its pure ownage!
The studio fired the director because he used to much blood and violence and they want to make the movie a PG13 >.> because they are surprised by the success of The Dark Knight and DK was PG13 [We all know why DK succeeded, only because of The Joker]
Anyway here's the R trailer
http://www.worstpreviews.com/trailer.php?id=322&item=2
They must know that Punisher kills ppl [hes not Batman]
m@D @n!m3
BT Rep: +1
so, punisher war zone wasn't horrible and i did like the violence. fast flashes of gore with blood splattering all over the place. it does have all the pretty colors like batman 3-5 or how ever many there were, but does a better job of it. the acting was horrid, but sumhow entertaining. good soundtrack. 6.5/10
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks