Vuze vs. utorrent

[rockaa]

I started using azureaus at first, but changed over to utorrent after vuze came up..
Had to many problems with it...

[M.a.M]

uTorrent FTW

[wiseD]

uTorrent, because it doesn't try to be anything better than what it is - an easy to use, minimal BT client.

[tomatoman]

Vuze just drains on memory I've had so much problems with it over the years
where as uTorrent just rules low memory use usage and is so simple to use great for everyone mac compatible aswell

[brightsid]

Azzureus-Vuze since Day 1.

[Polarbear]

...mac compatible aswell

it's not mac compatible. unlike vuze, utorrent is not a cross platform client. the mac version is rudimentary and banned on several trackers for what it is - an early beta.

[crusnik]

I personally prefer vuze.
just reiterating what's already been said, but imo the technical features and the benefits it gets from being open-source outweigh the resource requirements.
The resources required aren't that much anyways, as long as you keep your computer in good order and have an up-to-date system.
However, i haven't seen much of utorrent, so I can't say much comparing the two...

[hoodeh]

prediction: 85% utorrent.

i'm using vuze because it's the best and most advanced bittorrent client for mac os x.

I like transmission better, has all the features you need, a beautiful simple interface with the download/upload rate directly on the Dock icon, uses almost no resources and is very light.
Better than both utorrent and vuze in my opinion.
Then again it's only for Mac..

[Enzo]

utorrent of course...

[spero88]

utorrent is best