K-Lite Codec Pack 5.0.0

**Hairbautt** · 07-12-2009, 01:16 PM

Originally Posted by tesco

Originally Posted by iLOVENZB

Bingo

You missed the key word "minor"

Is there an actual system for determining the version # of software?

Btw, since Win7 I've been using Shark's Win7 codecs with the x64 bit components...Will K-lite be Win7 compatible?

**{I}{K}{E}** · 07-12-2009, 03:38 PM

Originally Posted by Hairbautt

Originally Posted by tesco

You missed the key word "minor"

.Will K-lite be Win7 compatible?

already works perfect on win7

**Hairbautt** · 07-12-2009, 03:41 PM

Originally Posted by {I}{K}{E}

Originally Posted by Hairbautt

.Will K-lite be Win7 compatible?

already works perfect on win7

Whatta 'bout QT Lite?

It'd be awesome if it did.

**{I}{K}{E}** · 07-12-2009, 04:38 PM

Originally Posted by Hairbautt

Originally Posted by {I}{K}{E}

already works perfect on win7

Whatta 'bout QT Lite?

It'd be awesome if it did.

Don't know

**tesco** · 07-12-2009, 05:22 PM

Originally Posted by Hairbautt

Originally Posted by tesco

You missed the key word "minor"

Is there an actual system for determining the version # of software?

Btw, since Win7 I've been using Shark's Win7 codecs with the x64 bit components...Will K-lite be Win7 compatible?

It's more just personal opinions. But most experienced developers don't just bump a version number unless there's some sort of major changes, usually visual changes if they apply.

**iLOVENZB** · 07-13-2009, 01:03 AM

Originally Posted by tesco

Originally Posted by iLOVENZB

Bingo

You missed the key word "minor"

But it's still an update. They can't update the packages and release it under the same version number?

Maybe they should of labeled it 4.9.6, but don't the version numbers increase by 0.0.5?

**tesco** · 07-15-2009, 10:36 PM

Originally Posted by iLOVENZB

Originally Posted by tesco

You missed the key word "minor"

But it's still an update. They can't update the packages and release it under the same version number?

Maybe they should of labeled it 4.9.6, but don't the version numbers increase by 0.0.5?

IMO there should be no version numbers.
There should just be dates.
But if they want a version number it can be for version of their system of installing/removing of the codecs. Each small update they make should just be the same version number with a new date at the end.

Oh well who cares they can do what they want.

I was just wondering if there was something major in this new version that's all.