Not to be harsh or anything, but you accusing someone else of having a closed mind is a bit rich.
As for the rest: I don't know whether we've messed up the planet to the point where we're doomed - polar ice caps melting, gulf stream stopping, etc etc - but, to reiterate: The CEI does not appear to be an agency people should be taking seriously.
I've formed this opinion mainly through reading about their political bias, and some statements they've made (switching from coal to a energy source less prone to pollution kills, growth hormones aren't bad, etc).
And furthermore: Should it turn out we're not rushing in a new ice age or something equally hilarious via our current emissions, then that's just swell. If someone proves that, it'll be just great. If the studies showing that we've affected climate change and whatnot could be proven to be bunkum, that'd be great too.
On a personal level, however, I find it hard to believe that all the research that would point to another conclusion can be dismissed. One reason being that the IPCC have less reason to make shit up, than, say, the CEI.
Bookmarks