Haha. You, sir, are a friggin genious!!Originally Posted by bas1c
NOT.
PS: You could try DDL sites. No ratios there.
I is posting MACHINE
BT Rep: +6
Haha. You, sir, are a friggin genious!!
PS: You could try DDL sites. No ratios there.
Last edited by The_Martinator; 09-25-2009 at 05:12 PM.
I'm back. The downside is that I'm also old now.
Member
FTP > DDL.Haha. You, sir, are a friggin genious!!
PS: You could try DDL sites. No ratios there.
Trackers are fun, but what.cd isn't.
BT Rep: +1
no offense but you are a retarded bas1c, just because you cant maintain a ratio there it doesnt mean they suck it means YOU suck there are 100k members that can maintain a ratio on what & 50k on waffles
yeah and about thei say goodluck with that."buy a buffered account and get what you want, or an invite and hit and run what you want. Rinse and repeat.
so thats it, you only dl on freeleeches?, i give you a good advice stick to your shitty limewire & ddl forums and dont come near private trackersEasier than waiting 2 years for the next FL
if u cant share dont bother joining one, nobody wants you in their site
wow bas1c just wow!
Talk about honesty!
ps:============D~~~~~~~~
Member
N/m forget it. Enjoy your lvl 3 tracker.
Last edited by bas1c; 09-25-2009 at 08:38 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Poster
BT Rep: +10
Wow, Bas1c sorta sounds like a douche. I'm not saying he is one, just sounds like itFYI, unless you have a very slow connection, it is possible to maintain the minimum ratio at both What and Waffles. Keep in mind that they each have pretty low requirements. For example, you can download up to 30GB of music at What and you only need to keep a .30 ratio. The same downloaded amount at Waffles only requires a .25 ratio. This is very doable, especially if you seed stuff for a long time like they suggest, so stop bitching.
As for the What vs. Waffles topic, I think both are great trackers and are comparable content-wise, but I prefer What's layout, interface (Gazelle) and features. Also, I've noticed lately that stuff often gets upped to What and then takes a day or so to make it up at Waffles. So if I really had to choose one today it would be What.
Last edited by DarkLured; 09-25-2009 at 11:57 PM.
For me it's simple - they are both great.
Yeah, tracker level is THE most important thing.N/m forget it. Enjoy your lvl 3 tracker.
On the secont thought, on higher level tracker is a bit harder to accomplish your "get-invite-hit'n'run-get-another-invite" tactic, so, it may be that tracker level IS important in your case.
I don't like you
BT Rep: +10
/fixed
Last edited by cinephilia; 09-30-2009 at 06:14 PM.
whenever people agree with me, i always feel i must be wrong.
...
BT Rep: +2
Well said. Especially with the tagging bullshit. I cannot stand grabbing an album from What/Waffles only to find out the tags are a mess, and I have to go through and re-tag everything myself since the uploader didn't show a little care and do it him/herself before putting it on the tracker.
This is understandable if you grabbed the album from slsk, a forum, or even Demonoid. But that shouldn't be on trackers that specialize in music. And don't get me wrong, I think W/W are great sites with impressive archives(no matter what others think) and those rare gems. But they're always my last stop for an album.
Agree 100%. And i think the uploader do not care at all because he / she only upload something to build ratio. It's not about to share, it's about ratio.
IMO W/W are great music sites, but for real audiophiles, the lossless trackers are the right places.
Which lossless trackers would be the best?
Posting Permissions
NOT.
Reply With Quote
FYI, unless you have a very slow connection, it is possible to maintain the minimum ratio at both What and Waffles. Keep in mind that they each have pretty low requirements. For example, you can download up to 30GB of music at What and you only need to keep a .30 ratio. The same downloaded amount at Waffles only requires a .25 ratio. This is very doable, especially if you seed stuff for a long time like they suggest, so stop bitching.
Bookmarks