RevolutionTT.Interesting .Pretimes comparison Vs SCT Vs SCC

**Burnsy** · 11-08-2009, 04:44 PM

Originally Posted by waeldiab

What about TL

I think the OP was comparing RevTT only against SCC and ScT. Don't think they were taking TL into account

**RizKhan25000** · 11-09-2009, 03:52 PM

**Di@monds** · 11-09-2009, 10:13 PM

its true rtt pretimes is getting better and they even beated scc/sct on some rls
and here is example:

Zombieland.R5.LINE.XviD-ROAR won by RTT 1m 21s ap Followed By: #2 SCC (1m 24s ap) #3 TV (1m 25s ap) #4 ScT (1m 26s ap) #5 TiT (1m 30s ap)

**nethawk** · 11-09-2009, 11:15 PM

Originally Posted by RizKhan25000

That is a false sense of speed. What actually counts is your home connection speed. No matter how fast your seedbox is or how fast your seedbox download it from SCT, in the last stage you have to download it to your home computer and the speed would be according to your home connection. I reality you would first lose time by downloading it on your seedbox as ultimately you have to download it to your home computer with your home connection speed.

Originally Posted by RizKhan25000

Read my comments to PhillyEagles post.

I wasn't taking about seedbox to seedbox speeds. I don't have or use a seedbox. They might be useful for others, but not me. I was taking about how SCT and SCC have dozens of seedbox seeders seconds after uploads. This helps my home connection download speeds max out at 2MB/s. But on sites like RevTT with only one seeder after upload, my speed down to my home connection is usually only a few hundred KB/s. Thus, when RevTT beats SCT or SCC by a few seconds, it doesn't matter because my download would finish alot faster at SCT or SCC. The bottom line is, SCC and SCT has more users with seedboxes then any other sites. Plus they are all using auto download scripts. RevTT doesn't have this combination of speed and pretimes.