Post Count

[denis123]

Originally posted by Lamsey@17 October 2003 - 09:18
I don't want them removed, because it's an easy gauge of how much a member posts here. For example, we know that someone with 0 posts is either a n00b or a lounge lizard.

It's also possible to remove it just from the thread view so that it is still available in the profiles.

VB has thought of that, just check the profile Lamsey!

[Barbarossa]

I voted no cos I think it's quite interesting to see..

[N£MO]

I say no,there is no benefit to the board by removing them.

[hooked]

keep it . . . . its not important but stil its fun to see how many postcounts a person has

[Infested Cats]

Sounds good to me, takes away the unnecessary stress of finding 'witty' things to post for your memorable milestones. I couldn't care less either way about my post count, and I think a lot of member's feel the same.

It's not the post count that counts, it's the post that counts.

[FuNkY CaPrIcOrN]

Originally posted by Infested Cats@17 October 2003 - 06:56
It's not the post count that counts, it's the post that counts.

[Adster]

my thoughts exactly

[MUSLEMAN]

can we get passed the post count issue already

[Virtualbody1234]

If the post count is removed then we'll never see an end to the new threads started saying "How come there is no post count?"

So, I say keep them.

It's not the post count that counts, it's the post that counts.

Now that's a great point.

[thewizeard]

Ah, Virtualbody1234, and you would not have a reason to think of a new name when you reach the 1000 count!

Maybe the answer is, everyone who posts 100 times gets 5 stars.