Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Free Filesharing Will Always Exist..

  1. #11
    Originally posted by darkmind@29 October 2003 - 21:43
    radio -> TV -> internet
    records -> 8 track -> tape cassete -> cd -> internet
    projector -> movie theater -> video cassete -> dvd -> internet
    newspaper -> magazines -> internet

    all media is merging into one, the internet
    the riaa is afraid and running already
    it will only be a matter of time before the merge is complete and they are destroyed...
    ...and everything turns into crap!

    darkmind, your flowchart looks accurate, but also raises another point:
    in each example, the quality level seems to drop off at the end. Think about it.

    What would you prefer - watching a movie in a theater or sitting in front of your PC staring at a heavily compressed mpg file?

    what sounds better - 160k mp3s or the CDs they came from?

    news media? - dont make me laugh.

    I can't fault your analogy - it just doesn't look like good news when you lay it out like that. No cause for celebration if things really do play out like that.

  2. File Sharing   -   #12
    depends on ur connection
    and more ppl need a better connection to get this ride going smoother
    like
    T1, T3, SONET

  3. File Sharing   -   #13
    Rip The Jacker's Avatar Retired
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    6,236
    I went to go see Scary Movie 3 the other day. Before the movie started it showed an anti-piracy commercial about movie makers losing money or some crap like that. Looks like the RIAA is getting desperate.

    They are fighting a battle they can't win.

  4. File Sharing   -   #14
    Originally posted by Sid Hartha@30 October 2003 - 15:51
    Hey, filesharing is great - as long as you're not too concerned with quality (especially movies). To me (and many others), it's just a means to an end.

    Increased bandwidth just means you get crap faster.
    ur dl the wrong files
    the quality improves if u
    go for the full rips

    those really large files that could take weeks or months on any standard connection to dl

  5. File Sharing   -   #15
    Originally posted by darkmind+30 October 2003 - 15:12--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (darkmind @ 30 October 2003 - 15:12)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Sid Hartha@30 October 2003 - 15:51
    Hey, filesharing is great - as long as you&#39;re not too concerned with quality (especially movies). To me (and many others), it&#39;s just a means to an end.

    Increased bandwidth just means you get crap faster.
    ur dl the wrong files
    the quality improves if u
    go for the full rips

    those really large files that could take weeks or months on any standard connection to dl [/b][/quote]
    ur not listening - reading comprehension problem, maybe...

    I said mp3s are crap, compared to the original.

    I never said what type of connection I have (it&#39;s DSL).
    and yes, I only go for the full rips (stop making groundless assumptions about other members, pls).

    none of this has anything to do with what I was talking about.

    please don&#39;t reply if you can&#39;t bother to read my posts.

  6. File Sharing   -   #16
    yeah im not sure what prob u have if u get a full rip
    since when i get one i cant see the diff between it and the original

    and watching or listening to anything on my computer doesnt degrade my experience

  7. File Sharing   -   #17
    Originally posted by darkmind@30 October 2003 - 15:31
    yeah im not sure what prob u have if u get a full rip
    since when i get one i cant see the diff between it and the original

    and watching or listening to anything on my computer doesnt degrade my experience
    I apologise. I realize now I may as well be talking to a bag of sand. I won&#39;t bother you anymore.

    no hard feelings.

  8. File Sharing   -   #18
    Originally posted by darkmind@30 October 2003 - 07:35
    depends on ur connection...
    No, it doesn&#39;t.

    Now we&#39;re talking about bandwidth? Read your post again, then mine. What are you talking about?

    "all media is merging into one, the internet"

    great news, if you like crap.

    "projector -> movie theater -> video cassete -> dvd -> internet"

    Regardless of your connection, the fact is you&#39;re still sitting in front of a friggin&#39; computer screen watching a movie. Connection speed has nothing to do with it.
    Does anybody in this forum actually sit in front of a computer screen for 2 hours and watch a movie? Would anyone consider that an improvement - asthetically speaking - over seeing a film projected on a screen in a theater?

    "records -> 8 track -> tape cassete -> cd -> internet"

    mp3s are fine for checking out new music. Whenever I discover something I really like, I usually end up buying the CD. The reason: mp3s are inferior to the original. Especially the shit 128-160k files you find on K-lite.

    Hey, filesharing is great - as long as you&#39;re not too concerned with quality (especially movies). To me (and many others), it&#39;s just a means to an end.

    Increased bandwidth just means you get crap faster.

  9. File Sharing   -   #19
    yep i agree 100% the RIAA is fighting a losing battle...

  10. File Sharing   -   #20
    yay im a bag of sand

    from my view point neither one of us understands the other
    im not sure what ur getting at and ur not sure what im getting at

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •