Not everything is about your harshery, chavois. Although I often wish it was.
This is the domain of mbm. I dabbled a bit too but then realised my error when it became apparent that Ringsy is a colossal gay
Not everything is about your harshery, chavois. Although I often wish it was.
This is the domain of mbm. I dabbled a bit too but then realised my error when it became apparent that Ringsy is a colossal gay
He's got one of those spurious girlfriends, you know. His spurious girlfriend has spurious friends who fancy him and are willing to go to any lengths to secure a termination to his spurious relationship. True (based on a spurious) story.
It's in some thread he made a while back. It'll furnish you with a portrait of the piss-artist as a jung man.
Last edited by chalice; 02-06-2012 at 05:49 PM.
Hold the back page, does this mean that he didn't actually tell a real female person that it would be perfectly acceptable to cover the interior of her apartment with pictures of him and that he just wished that he had the opportunity to say such a thing.
This all sounds particularly and flagrantly arrogant and completely self-absorbed.
Nice to see the angle working retrospectively.
The homosexual angle was Manker's own furnishing of my persona. He insisted that I was some sort of eloquent homosexual. It was in some thread a while back. I take his statements made in this thread as an admission of my resilience. Thanks for the compliment, Darth Manks.
Oh. Gold.
I hope you do know that I enjoy this sort of stuff, truly. I remember a thread I started on another forum, linking a few pornographic videos, and asking if anyone knew the guy common to all of them. That came back on me for years until he demise of that forum.
It's things like you remembering my "moments" that truly lets me on to knowing that you want me, Chavis. However, I won't let you go through anymore pains to secure the termination of my current spurious relationship. I'm afraid I have to tell you I don't swing that way. Not yet, at least. Wait till my heart breaks a few more times.
Don't be silly. If they were all pictures of me, I'd come off as a selfish individual, vying for the attention of a select person. I feel my picture should be on everyone's walls. I therefore tell my acquaintances that they can put my posters all over town.
Ellipses go here.
Besides the fact that you aggrandize better than I, Darth (on account of its resonant sincerity), I can't seem to find a way to rip on you. So all that aside, why yeast instead of bacteria (resiliency?)?
I used to be enamored by the concept of biological electronics, DNA/peptide computing, etc. However, it hasn't been panning out as well as everyone has hoped, and quantum computing is heading to the fore if it's not already there.
Everything is brought to you by Fjohürs Lykkewe.
I'm glad I can be the center of attention for a change. That Dave fellow couldn't deal with fame, and it showed.
Flick must mean two different things between these two sides of the pond. You're going to have to elaborate, since it sounded like you just gave me a compliment.
I'm honored, thank you. Here, let me try to even get into his shoes. Men ... women ... fight ... broken ... record ... broken ... heart ... wanker and co. Not sure if that was Dave or J-dye. I'll improve, I promise.
It's only worthy of note because the nickname Hawt Cawk was bestowed upon me by your wife.
There's many quantum computer betas and fully functioning quantum computers on the market right now. Some of their internal workings won't be public for another 9-10 months, so my work isn't quite useless just yet*. Moreover, a quantum computer is useless for calculations but amazing for predictability, due to its nature. Biological electronics hit the sweet spot in the middle of both modern and future models.
The only reason I actually am going through with this specific experiment (along with the team) is that it's eukaryotic. E Coli would probably prove a lot easier to tinker with, but we want a more future proof model; something like legos that can be applied to humans without much further testing (unless it's in the clinic, of course). It's the opinion of more than one person in the lab (though, not my own) that yeast is the next big frontier. I personally think it's prime is past, and viruses are the next big model. Disagreement won't stop my being interested in the project, however.
We're not exactly interested in the keyboard, but the applications of our model. If we can regulate I/O at the cellular level, we can create an entire framework that contextually behaves differently in different environments out of our work. PC in a loaf of bread sort of thing, or a band-aid that exhibits different colors depending on your kind of infection. This sort of thing has been done before but with dedicated strains. The uniqueness of our work is that it will be a single strain solution.
* ETA for project is actually Q3 2012, so we have hopes to not be bested without a fight.
Last edited by Quarterquack; 02-07-2012 at 12:47 AM.
Ellipses go here.
Bookmarks