He said a 64MB card would be the same as a 128MB card...how?
He said a 64MB card would be the same as a 128MB card...how?
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
i think he was trying to compare a 64mb DDR graphics card to 128mb sd graphics cardOriginally posted by bigdawgfoxx@22 November 2003 - 18:48
He said a 64MB card would be the same as a 128MB card...how?
Oh ok...well arent almost all G cards DDR now?
[SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum
yes, but still the 128sd ram card would be betterOriginally posted by bigdawgfoxx@22 November 2003 - 20:37
Oh ok...well arent almost all G cards DDR now?
a 64mb card will perform similarly to a 128mb card when the applications do not exceed the abilities of the 64mb + AGP combination. since most mac users are not video game players, a 64mb card is more than enough for the average 3D program. not to mention that macs don't use direct3D, which is a microsoft API, so a 9600 doesn't lag nearly as far behind a 9800 in openGL as it would in direct3D.
yes, but still the 128sd ram card would be better [/b][/quote]Originally posted by Kunal+22 November 2003 - 22:26--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Kunal @ 22 November 2003 - 22:26)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-bigdawgfoxx@22 November 2003 - 20:37
Oh ok...well arent almost all G cards DDR now?
Nah man not really. It also depends on the clock speeds on the card.
Bookmarks