obviously it'd be against all your emotions and feelings, but if there is no use for the law in this case, why have it?[/b][/quote]Originally posted by 3rd gen noob+14 December 2003 - 07:58--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (3rd gen noob @ 14 December 2003 - 07:58)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-hobbes@14 December 2003 - 05:38
Well, let me cut your Mother's head off and give it to you in a box. Then tell me what you think.
Let me put it this way. If you were at home with a gun in your hands and an intruder killed you mother before your eyes, would you tell him to hold still until the authorities arrived or shoot him dead?
Sorry, I was distracted by the excellent contribution by ghoulardi.
In some instances, I would consider my sense of justice more important than societal law.
I would do what I believed to be correct and face the consequences, if society deems otherwise.
Jpol eloquently discussed the difference between legal and morally justifyable earlier.
I guess we all have certain moral beliefs, mine indicate that you don't kill my family members, the common law can go fuck itself.
You must take into consideration that Americans now fear the competency of the legal system since the OJ Simpon travesty. No way I am going to leave the decision in the hands of that dog and pony show.
Bookmarks