y do u keep making the ultra word bold.... [/b][/quote]Originally posted by raiserblade2003+19 December 2003 - 17:08--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (raiserblade2003 @ 19 December 2003 - 17:08)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-atiVidia@19 December 2003 - 21:53
a while back I sed 5900 ULTRA! not 5900.
only the 5700 ultra can be compared to the 9600 xt
ATI has a great reputation when it comes to fsaa and antisotropic filtering (asf) but if u get a 5900 ultra and play ur games at 1600 x 1200 resolution, fsaa and asf dont really matter, and can be turned off. in which case the nVidia card will horribly FUCK ATI in its tiny little hole, tearing its innards apart. this is what people do not realize.
so, if u have a 19+" monitor and play your games at 1600 x 1200, get an nVidia 5900 ultra
if u play ur games any lower than that, get an ATI 9800 pro (unless u dont care for jaggies)
--------<edit>--------.
also, if u get a 9800 pro, be prepared to swap the fan (its stock fan is useless when overclocking)
------<edit end>------.
yes, the 5900 ultra can be found for less than 250, and gives you a true ass fucker in terms of performance
--------<edit>--------.
same with the mainstream cards. if u want to play ur games at 1600 x 1200, get an nVidia 5700 ultra. otherwise, get a 9600xt. this is the simple god damned truth
------<edit end>------.
cuz everyone thot i wuz talkin bout the regular 5900, when I was talking about the 5900 ultra. there is a difference u kno
Bookmarks