Statistically

[internet.news]

Originally posted by Withcheese+12 January 2004 - 01:45--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Withcheese @ 12 January 2004 - 01:45)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by internet.news@11 January 2004 - 23:42
<!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol

@12 January 2004 - 01:39
Five out of every four people do not understand how statistics work.

Statistics are statistics. If it tell you that 3 of 4 ppl in here are posting SPAM (just example as it is not true&#33, that means that 3 ppl posting Spam the 4th not. But that does not has to be everytime so, sometimes there might be 3 people - good posts - the 4th: SPAM.

this is just an example.

oh, internet.news you never cease to baffle me [/b][/quote]

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by internet.news+12 January 2004 - 01:46--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (internet.news @ 12 January 2004 - 01:46)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by Withcheese@12 January 2004 - 01:45

Originally posted by internet.news@11 January 2004 - 23:42
<!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol

@12 January 2004 - 01:39
Five out of every four people do not understand how statistics work.

Statistics are statistics. If it tell you that 3 of 4 ppl in here are posting SPAM (just example as it is not true&#33, that means that 3 ppl posting Spam the 4th not. But that does not has to be everytime so, sometimes there might be 3 people - good posts - the 4th: SPAM.

this is just an example.

oh, internet.news you never cease to baffle me

[/b][/quote]
Actually read the words in my first post.

[bujub22]

Originally posted by internet.news+11 January 2004 - 20:42--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (internet.news @ 11 January 2004 - 20:42)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol@12 January 2004 - 01:39
Five out of every four people do not understand how statistics work.

Statistics are statistics. If it tell you that 3 of 4 ppl in here are posting SPAM (just example as it is not true&#33, that means that 3 ppl posting Spam the 4th not. But that does not has to be everytime so, sometimes there might be 3 people - good posts - the 4th: SPAM.

this is just an example. [/b][/quote]
your mad at spam

[Cheese]

Originally posted by bujub22+11 January 2004 - 23:49--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bujub22 @ 11 January 2004 - 23:49)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by internet.news@11 January 2004 - 20:42
<!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol

@12 January 2004 - 01:39
Five out of every four people do not understand how statistics work.

Statistics are statistics. If it tell you that 3 of 4 ppl in here are posting SPAM (just example as it is not true&#33, that means that 3 ppl posting Spam the 4th not. But that does not has to be everytime so, sometimes there might be 3 people - good posts - the 4th: SPAM.

this is just an example.

your mad at spam [/b][/quote]
This coming from the queen of spam?

[bujub22]

Originally posted by Withcheese+11 January 2004 - 20:51--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Withcheese @ 11 January 2004 - 20:51)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by bujub22@11 January 2004 - 23:49

Originally posted by internet.news@11 January 2004 - 20:42
<!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol

@12 January 2004 - 01:39
Five out of every four people do not understand how statistics work.

Statistics are statistics. If it tell you that 3 of 4 ppl in here are posting SPAM (just example as it is not true&#33, that means that 3 ppl posting Spam the 4th not. But that does not has to be everytime so, sometimes there might be 3 people - good posts - the 4th: SPAM.

this is just an example.

your mad at spam

This coming from the queen of spam? [/b][/quote]
no your my biatch pika pika

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by bujub22+12 January 2004 - 01:49--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (bujub22 @ 12 January 2004 - 01:49)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by internet.news@11 January 2004 - 20:42
<!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol

@12 January 2004 - 01:39
Five out of every four people do not understand how statistics work.

Statistics are statistics. If it tell you that 3 of 4 ppl in here are posting SPAM (just example as it is not true&#33, that means that 3 ppl posting Spam the 4th not. But that does not has to be everytime so, sometimes there might be 3 people - good posts - the 4th: SPAM.

this is just an example.

your mad at spam [/b][/quote]
I don&#39;t particularly like it, but I think mad overstates the case.

[Lamsey]

If I could be bothered about it, I could probably show that the degree to which members spam is approximately Normally Distributed around the 20 years of age mark with a Standard Deviation of about 5, then I could make statistical inferences about how unlikely it is for J&#39;Pol to spam seeing as he is 86, thus proving him to be somewhat abnormal if he ever spams.


But I can&#39;t be arsed.

[thewizeard]

Originally posted by J&#39;Pol+12 January 2004 - 00:53--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (J&#39;Pol @ 12 January 2004 - 00:53)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by bujub22@12 January 2004 - 01:49

Originally posted by internet.news@11 January 2004 - 20:42
<!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol

@12 January 2004 - 01:39
Five out of every four people do not understand how statistics work.

Statistics are statistics. If it tell you that 3 of 4 ppl in here are posting SPAM (just example as it is not true&#33, that means that 3 ppl posting Spam the 4th not. But that does not has to be everytime so, sometimes there might be 3 people - good posts - the 4th: SPAM.

this is just an example.

your mad at spam

I don&#39;t particularly like it, but I think mad overstates the case. [/b][/quote]
I thought the case was already overstated

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by nigel123+12 January 2004 - 01:57--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (nigel123 @ 12 January 2004 - 01:57)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Originally posted by J&#39;Pol@12 January 2004 - 00:53

Originally posted by bujub22@12 January 2004 - 01:49

Originally posted by internet.news@11 January 2004 - 20:42
<!--QuoteBegin-J&#39;Pol

@12 January 2004 - 01:39
Five out of every four people do not understand how statistics work.

Statistics are statistics. If it tell you that 3 of 4 ppl in here are posting SPAM (just example as it is not true&#33, that means that 3 ppl posting Spam the 4th not. But that does not has to be everytime so, sometimes there might be 3 people - good posts - the 4th: SPAM.

this is just an example.

your mad at spam

I don&#39;t particularly like it, but I think mad overstates the case.

I thought the case was already overstated [/b][/quote]

[J'Pol]

Originally posted by Lamsey@12 January 2004 - 01:54
If I could be bothered about it, I could probably show that the degree to which members spam is approximately Normally Distributed around the 20 years of age mark with a Standard Deviation of about 5, then I could make statistical inferences about how unlikely it is for J&#39;Pol to spam seeing as he is 86, thus proving him to be somewhat abnormal if he ever spams.


But I can&#39;t be arsed.

I&#39;m 76 and well you know it Lady.