www.thermalright.comOriginally posted by SciManAl@15 February 2004 - 19:40
you may want to provide a link to that abu...
click on Amd Heatsink, then SP-97.
not that hard
www.thermalright.comOriginally posted by SciManAl@15 February 2004 - 19:40
you may want to provide a link to that abu...
click on Amd Heatsink, then SP-97.
not that hard
I guess, I probably won't overclock for a couple of months because I will be too busy playing gamesOriginally posted by SciManAl@15 February 2004 - 18:46
only if you get that far... your set up might only get it to 2800+ ya never know just try it.. slow and steady... as your cooling permits go on up..Well I think there would be an obvious difference between 2500+ and 3200+ don't you agree? they have a huge price difference
Ohh noo!!! I make dribbles!!!
y woudl u oc the 2500, its fast enuf....and coming from a 400mhz cpu, i think you shoudl see big enuf of a difference.
i dont get why most ppl want to oc...maybe just so they can brag about it. i mean the speed isnt going to be that much more noticable unless u do benchmark. btu for regualr day stuff, its gonna be the same
People say I'll see a difference from the 400mhz and the 2500+ but that's not comparable because the 400mhz can't run the games the 2500+ can. Myabe I'll see a 100fps in Counter Stike no?
Ohh noo!!! I make dribbles!!!
First of all (and I'm amazed no one has actually said anything about this), there are 2 different 2500+ processors:Originally posted by Mr. Elmo@15 February 2004 - 18:34
y woudl u oc the 2500, its fast enuf....and coming from a 400mhz cpu, i think you shoudl see big enuf of a difference.
i dont get why most ppl want to oc...maybe just so they can brag about it. i mean the speed isnt going to be that much more noticable unless u do benchmark. btu for regualr day stuff, its gonna be the same
The Barton 2500+ FSB: 333
The Barton 2500+ FSB: 266
I haven't seen any 400FSB 2500+, so if you can point me to one, I'll stand corrected
I never seen a 266
Ohh noo!!! I make dribbles!!!
Also, arn't the new bartons locked to prevent beng pushed to 3.2? Or am i misinformed?
the 2500-266 isnt a barton is it? isnt it just a thourghbred?Originally posted by DWk@16 February 2004 - 01:50
First of all (and I'm amazed no one has actually said anything about this), there are 2 different 2500+ processors:
The Barton 2500+ FSB: 333
The Barton 2500+ FSB: 266
I haven't seen any 400FSB 2500+, so if you can point me to one, I'll stand corrected
the only 400fsb ive seen is the 3000 and 3200
edit: newegg dont even have a 2500-266
edit2: infact the 2500 and everything above it have 333fsb, apart from 3000 nd 3200 which also have 400fsb variants
I guess the Search function is too l33t for all of yousOriginally posted by Livy@15 February 2004 - 20:04
the 2500-266 isnt a barton is it? isnt it just a thourghbred?
the only 400fsb ive seen is the 3000 and 3200
edit: newegg dont even have a 2500-266
here
And no. I'm not talking about the L2 Cache size.... I'm talking about the FSB. That is the difference between Barton and T-bred. Barton is 512 and T-bred is 256. However, I'm only talking about FSB.
Edit - The 266 is the mobile version, I forgot to add
Bookmarks