Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: Risks In Overclocking

  1. #11
    abu_has_the_power's Avatar I have cool stars
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    6,447
    Originally posted by SciManAl@15 February 2004 - 19:40
    you may want to provide a link to that abu...
    www.thermalright.com

    click on Amd Heatsink, then SP-97.

    not that hard

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #12
    Keikan's Avatar ........
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Edmonton (Not Enfield)
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,743
    Originally posted by SciManAl@15 February 2004 - 18:46
    Well I think there would be an obvious difference between 2500+ and 3200+ don't you agree? they have a huge price difference
    only if you get that far... your set up might only get it to 2800+ ya never know just try it.. slow and steady... as your cooling permits go on up..
    I guess, I probably won't overclock for a couple of months because I will be too busy playing games
    Ohh noo!!! I make dribbles!!!

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #13
    Poster
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    1,037
    y woudl u oc the 2500, its fast enuf....and coming from a 400mhz cpu, i think you shoudl see big enuf of a difference.

    i dont get why most ppl want to oc...maybe just so they can brag about it. i mean the speed isnt going to be that much more noticable unless u do benchmark. btu for regualr day stuff, its gonna be the same

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #14
    Keikan's Avatar ........
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Edmonton (Not Enfield)
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,743
    People say I'll see a difference from the 400mhz and the 2500+ but that's not comparable because the 400mhz can't run the games the 2500+ can. Myabe I'll see a 100fps in Counter Stike no?
    Ohh noo!!! I make dribbles!!!

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #15
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Guatemala
    Posts
    4,044
    Originally posted by Mr. Elmo@15 February 2004 - 18:34
    y woudl u oc the 2500, its fast enuf....and coming from a 400mhz cpu, i think you shoudl see big enuf of a difference.

    i dont get why most ppl want to oc...maybe just so they can brag about it. i mean the speed isnt going to be that much more noticable unless u do benchmark. btu for regualr day stuff, its gonna be the same
    First of all (and I'm amazed no one has actually said anything about this), there are 2 different 2500+ processors:

    The Barton 2500+ FSB: 333
    The Barton 2500+ FSB: 266

    I haven't seen any 400FSB 2500+, so if you can point me to one, I'll stand corrected

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #16
    Keikan's Avatar ........
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Edmonton (Not Enfield)
    Age
    34
    Posts
    3,743
    I never seen a 266
    Ohh noo!!! I make dribbles!!!

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #17
    RGX's Avatar Unstoppable
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,012
    Also, arn't the new bartons locked to prevent beng pushed to 3.2? Or am i misinformed?

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #18
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Guatemala
    Posts
    4,044

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #19
    Livy's Avatar Simpleton
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,013
    Originally posted by DWk@16 February 2004 - 01:50

    First of all (and I'm amazed no one has actually said anything about this), there are 2 different 2500+ processors:

    The Barton 2500+ FSB: 333
    The Barton 2500+ FSB: 266

    I haven't seen any 400FSB 2500+, so if you can point me to one, I'll stand corrected
    the 2500-266 isnt a barton is it? isnt it just a thourghbred?

    the only 400fsb ive seen is the 3000 and 3200

    edit: newegg dont even have a 2500-266

    edit2: infact the 2500 and everything above it have 333fsb, apart from 3000 nd 3200 which also have 400fsb variants

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #20
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Guatemala
    Posts
    4,044
    Originally posted by Livy@15 February 2004 - 20:04
    the 2500-266 isnt a barton is it? isnt it just a thourghbred?

    the only 400fsb ive seen is the 3000 and 3200

    edit: newegg dont even have a 2500-266
    I guess the Search function is too l33t for all of yous

    here

    And no. I'm not talking about the L2 Cache size.... I'm talking about the FSB. That is the difference between Barton and T-bred. Barton is 512 and T-bred is 256. However, I'm only talking about FSB.

    Edit - The 266 is the mobile version, I forgot to add

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •