Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Legal Information

  1. #11
    Poster
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    North-east england UK
    Posts
    2,657
    if its copyrighted shouldn't djweiser not be mixing them in the first place without the artists consent?

  2. The Drawing Room   -   #12
    Cheese's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    is everything.
    Age
    46
    Posts
    15,287
    Originally posted by 4play@18 February 2004 - 15:13
    I used to frequent a site that had mixes of certain dj's from a whole bunch of white lables. this still did not stop the bpi (at the time) having his host remove all his files.

    even after he explained to the bpi all the files he had where given to him for promotional use they still said tuff. seems to me like they really dont have the power to make this decision but they did.
    so he picked a host abroad and there was nothing the bpi could do. they asked for the files to be removed again and this time the host wrote a nasty email to them telling them to suck his cock.

    has anybody heard of the grey album it is a mix of the beatle white album and the lyrics from jay-z's the black album. emi have been trying there best to sto people trading and selling these files. there has been a big stink about this since the artist claims they are stifling creativity.


    source
    That grey album is on the soulseek network, just started dling it now.

  3. The Drawing Room   -   #13
    Poster
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,158
    Originally posted by Marius24@24 February 2004 - 19:51
    if its copyrighted shouldn't djweiser not be mixing them in the first place without the artists consent?
    If were true, that would mean every DJ in the world would have to contact every artist before they mixed any of thier songs.....

    not true

  4. The Drawing Room   -   #14
    lynx's Avatar .
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    9,759
    Originally posted by djweiser+29 February 2004 - 11:25--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (djweiser @ 29 February 2004 - 11:25)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Marius24@24 February 2004 - 19:51
    if its copyrighted shouldn&#39;t djweiser not be mixing them in the first place without the artists consent?
    If were true, that would mean every DJ in the world would have to contact every artist before they mixed any of thier songs.....

    not true [/b][/quote]
    In theory, yes they should. The record companies would love it. It would mean they could employ yet another small army of people, and use that to justify exorbitant fees which would bring them in even more money.
    .
    Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •