Ubisoft Vs Ea

[Illuminati]

Depends on whether you're talking about either's developers or the actual publishers themselves.

If you mean publishers, then neither - Both have had a rep in the past of botching some games' launches in the past. TBH I'd have preferred to go with Micro Prose if it were a few years ago

As for developers, still neither - The Black Isle/Bioware boys any day

For a hybrid of both, Introversion Software seem to be a developer/publisher with an upcoming future, what with Uplink and their next game

[BigBoo]

it seems publishers boss the developers around quite a lot. so when ubisoft and activision among many others will let developers experiment and give them freedom to develop. EA, it seems, have a strict schedule and simply buy licenses and say to their developers "make this game in this time!!!"

[abu_has_the_power]

ubisoft like duh. lets c, farcry (even though crytek made the game), pop, splinter cell 1 + 2, and some others. ea games were ok once upon a time, but they're drowning in the pool of competition. still, the original mohaa online is still pretty fun sometimes

[BigBoo]

ea are running away with the market cos stupid fuxors continue to follow marketing

[Twist3r]

i like Ubisoft because they make raibow Six 3 and Splintercell
ea games has MOHAA and BF1942

both have good and bad but ubi has more good then bad

[cpt_azad]

i like ACTIVISION , seriously though UBISOFT (come on guys don't forget FAR CRY&#33 EA's only accomplishment was MOHAA IMO