Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: Cpu Speed Cache Fsb

  1. #11
    whats the multiplier to get 400FSB with amd 2500?
    133? 166?
    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:red'><span style='font-familyptima'>&gt;&gt;FORUM&lt;&lt;</span></span></span>

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #12
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,184
    If having the fastest RAM is your concern, I wouldn&#39;t opt for an Athlon XP. This is on the basis that the FSB, for the 2500+, runs at a mere 333MHz. Even when overclocked, it will operate at 400MHz (3.2GB/s, half of the current crop of CPUs).

    If you wish for your RAM to function in dual-channel mode, you would have to have your RAM operating at pathetic PC1600 speeds to utilise the available bandwidth to its full potential. Otherwise, if, for instance, you purchased PC3200 RAM (instead of PC1600 - 200MHz) you would find yourself with severe bottleneck available, which would be an utter waste of cash.

    So, in conclusion, if you are looking to purchase 400MHz+ RAM, to be run in dual-channel, buy a Pentium 4 or Athlon 64/FX (which run at 1.6GHz HyperTransport).

    333MHz FSB = 2664MB/s or 166.5MHz DC RAM
    400MHz FSB = 3200MB/s or 200MHz DC RAM
    800MHz FSB = 6400MB/s or 400MHz DC RAM (the best option, as the bandwidth available can be utilised fully, by PC3200 RAM operating in dual-channel).

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #13
    tesco's Avatar woowoo
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    21,669
    Originally posted by haha21@29 June 2004 - 13:41
    whats the multiplier to get 400FSB with amd 2500?
    133? 166?
    huh? fsb and multiplier have nothing to do with eachother.

    For your knowledge, here is the multiplirer and fsb of the 2500+ and 3200+:

    2500+
    multiplier: 11x
    FSB: 166mhz (333mhz effective)

    3200+
    multiplier: 11x
    FSB: 200mhz (400mhz effective)


    notice anything? the multiplier&#39;s are the same...only difference between the two processors is the FSB speed. Upping the fsb to 400mhz makes it run 3200+ speeds

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #14
    Twist3r
    Guest
    The Athlon 64 would be real nice, but its alot more money, plus you need a more spendy mobo too
    If I want on such a low budget I would get it, but right now its about getting all the bang I can get with my buck&#33;

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #15
    Twist3r
    Guest
    Here are some numbers I came up with:


    ASUS Athlon 64 mobo: &#036;111.00
    Athlon 64 CPU: &#036;173.00
    _______________________

    Athlon XP 2500+: &#036;80.00
    Asus Athon socket A: &#036;76.00

    I realize a Athlon 64 would KICK ASS but I just cant offord it, Im more interested in a expensive video card more a high end CPU and Mobo.

    So here is currently my list all currancy is US:

    ABIT "NF7-S" nForce2 Chipset Motherboard for AMD Socket A CPU
    Link
    &#036;85

    AMD Athlon XP 2500+ "Barton", 333 FSB, 512K Cache Processor
    Link
    &#036;80

    Kingmax 184 Pin 512MB DDR PC-3200
    Link
    &#036;81

    SAPPHIRE ATI RADEON 9800PRO Video Card, 128MB DDR, 256-bit, DVI/TV-Out, 8X AGP
    Link
    &#036;214

    The case, im not sure about, one that comes with a 420 watt or more power supply

    I allready have a DVD drive im going to put in there.

    any cheap 80 gigabyte 7200 rpm 8mb cache will work, I dont mind noise

    And thats about it

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #16
    bigdawgfoxx's Avatar Big Dawg
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,821
    Dont get a K6 Via chipset....get an nForce2. Get the Asus A7N8X if you want an asus board.
    [SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
    1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
    HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #17
    Twist3r
    Guest
    k updated it by adding Asus A7N8X feedback is welcome&#33;

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #18
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    OK, you asked for it.

    I have owned both the Asus A7N8X-Deluxe (rev2) and the ABIT NF7-S.

    I prefer the ABIT.
    Same nForce 2 chipset and sound, better OC capability and a few more features.
    Right around the same price, I believe.

    You should check it out.


    Sorry Dawg.
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #19
    bigdawgfoxx's Avatar Big Dawg
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Age
    35
    Posts
    3,821
    Dont be sorry, I respect your addition just as much as my own. I thought he might be an Asus fan or something so I said if he wants an asus board.

    Doesnt the ABIT also come with Sata/raid or is that just the rev 2 or what?

    I just love my Asus board for its extreme reliablility...Ive never had a problem with it.
    [SIZE=1]AMD 4200 X2 @ 2.65Ghz, ASRock 939-VSTA
    1.75GB PC3200, 2 X 160GB Seagate w/ 8MB Buffer
    HIS Radeon X800 Pro, Antec Super Lanboy Aluminum

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #20
    clocker's Avatar Shovel Ready
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    15,305
    Both the Asus (deluxe version) and the ABIT come with SATARaid.
    The Abit has one more USB header than the Asus, it uses the Intel 4 pin power connector so the chip has it&#39;s own power feed ( supposedly more stable core voltage), the I/O panel has extra audio outlets so you can hook 5.1 sound into it without using the mic/line in ports AND it has about a million BIOSs available.

    I liked my Asus just fine, I just like the Abit abit more (get it?).
    "I am the one who knocks."- Heisenberg

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •