The original article suggested that liberalism was both pointless and arbitrary.
I have proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that it is about the belief in true freedom and that it's goals are quite logical.
Proven?
I beg to differ-it may be, in one of it's incarnations, just as you say; it does, however (and this, too, beyond that selfsame "shadow of doubt") find itself-due to it's overweening obsequiousness to minorities of any race/creed/behavior/sexual preference or peccadilloe-at odds with the core principles of the Constitution.
I have shown that the Constitution has no conflict with homosexual union and that the concept that Pedophiles would be protected is a totally
incorrect.
No you haven't; the Constitution doesn't mention what the Founders would have no doubt referred to as aberrant behavior, but, in any case, let us remain "in the daylight", so to speak, and forego any discussion of aberrance, rather, and better, to forego any argument that the omission of any such reference can be parlayed into "no conflict".
Plainly put, the issue is not addressed, and cannot therefore be pronounced upon "constitutionally".
No human that abuses another has any "rights".
People don't seem to understand that it is not freedom "as Christians see it", but real freedom.
My questions is this:
Was the author of the article so stupid as to think that pedophiles would be granted the freedom to abuse children, or knowledgable of his own logical flaw, but not caring, simply to carry forth his religious agenda.
No, I believe he is curious, as am I (and so should you be), as to why and how such as NAMBLA (with the aid of the ACLU) can even be allowed their "day in court" without being done the courtesy of being informed, in no uncertain terms, by all sides, that they are pissing into the wind, and to go home?
The liberals could accomplish this pretty easily, but will not, owing to their ill-administered and indiscriminate plank of "inclusion".
They are accomodating and advocating a tremendous waste of time and resources.
So many ****ing liars for the cause, they should be shot.
I agree that people should be free, just not those fags.
Bookmarks