evolution sticker in textbook ruled unconstitutional

[Cheese]

I followed the link, then I investigated the author of the site.

I found this, which pretty much leaves "Dr" Kent Hovind discredited, wouldn't you say?

Good catch Lynx.

I might have to take some of the links manny provided us with me to uni tomorrow for a good laugh.

[manker]

Meh, I thought some of the counter arguments against evolution on that site were interesting. For me it highlighted the inherent weaknesses in the theory yet strengthened - by omission - the undoubted strengths.

I'll never believe in God but those that do present some good arguments, on occasion.


Having said that, the Hovind pseudo 'Doctor' has been immersed up to his neck in primordial soup by that article. Nice one, lynx.

[UKResident]

1st and 2nd law of thermaldynamics

conservation of angular momentum

That's off the top of my head.
Yeah, RIGHT OFF!!
if you want to know why; Your going to have to follow the link

Just, watch. It's pretty amazing, and it's always worth exposure, if anything.

Manny, you really should shut up you know, you're just sinking deeper and deeper into the mire.

There are many sites on the net that rubbish the creationist's claims about the laws of thermodynamics, one l particulary like is by an evangelical christian .. The Second Law of Thermodynamics in the Context of the Christian Faith.

[Busyman]

Evolution has it's holes.

It's............a.................theory..................f.................f.............s!!!


Creationism isn't even that.

Creationism can't even be discussed scientifically.

First off it's CHRISTIAN CREATIONISM which is not a general area of study.

For some here, it's head out of the ass time.

Evolution is a theory...nothing more.

[UKResident]

Evolution is a theory...nothing more.

Evolution is a lot more than a theory, there is an incredible amount of observation and evidence backing it up, to say it is nothing more than a theory is to put it in the same category as creationism,

[Barbarossa]

Definitions of the word Theory

[hobbes]

1st and 2nd law of thermaldynamics

conservation of angular momentum

That's off the top of my head.

if you want to know why; Your going to have to follow the link

Just, watch. It's pretty amazing, and it's always worth exposure, if anything.

Sorry, it does not. Just because you see it on the interweb doesn't make it true. But isn't that what faith is all about, belief without proof. Someone tells you it breaks certain laws, that is what you want to hear and you turn around and repeat it without a critical analysis.

If you could articulate exactly why you think it breaks the above laws, in your own words, I would like to hear. Personally, I think these laws are something you may have heard about, but have never really studied in a classroom setting.

You should have that sticker thingey stuck as your signature here

[Biggles]

I followed the link, then I investigated the author of the site.

I found this, which pretty much leaves "Dr" Kent Hovind discredited, wouldn't you say?

Fascinating! What a shower of charaltans!

Actually I have no problem with people posing alternatives to natural selection as a means to propel evolution - that is normal scientific progress . However, the young earth thing is just a bit mad and requires me to swallow too many unbelieveable things before breakfast (I can only manage one or two) .