Battlefield 2 and next Medal of Honor game delayed

**silent h3ro** · 02-22-2005, 01:16 AM

Originally Posted by TheDave

i have a strange morality(?) about games. i paid for MoH:frontline but not paying for any others until they put some effort in again

Yeah me too, I'll only pay for good online games.

**TheDave** · 02-22-2005, 01:24 AM

yeah kinda like that

**cpt_azad** · 02-22-2005, 03:21 AM

speakin of Battlefield 2:

http://www.actiontrip.com/features/battlefield2.phtml

**TheDave** · 02-22-2005, 01:50 PM

phew! i got a few months to upgrade

**FinalTheorem** · 02-23-2005, 05:05 AM

Originally Posted by Peerzy

So its the same game, but totally different

No, it's a different in the aspects that I mentioned, but the plot will obviously be the same, WWII, and the MOH franchise, in my opinion has made particalrly few improvemnets as far as other aspects of the game, like map design, and graphics. I didn't really mean to start an argument, I was just saying what I thouhgt about WWII games, and I think I'll shut my mouth because I just played Call of Duty at my friend's house, and it was a pretty decent game. MOH on the other hand... EA is just pumping out new ones every few months it seems to make more money. Money is good of course, but I'd rather have a quality game.

I know this is a filesharing forum, but I'm kind of thinking about console games. I haven't paid for a PC game in years, nor have I complained about a game I didn't pay for.

**cpt_azad** · 02-23-2005, 06:08 AM

Originally Posted by speeddemon5988

No, it's a different in the aspects that I mentioned, but the plot will obviously be the same, WWII, and the MOH franchise, in my opinion has made particalrly few improvemnets as far as other aspects of the game, like map design, and graphics. I didn't really mean to start an argument, I was just saying what I thouhgt about WWII games, and I think I'll shut my mouth because I just played Call of Duty at my friend's house, and it was a pretty decent game. MOH on the other hand... EA is just pumping out new ones every few months it seems to make more money. Money is good of course, but I'd rather have a quality game.

I know this is a filesharing forum, but I'm kind of thinking about console games. I haven't paid for a PC game in years, nor have I complained about a game I didn't pay for.

Agreed. EA is just out for money, it doesnt really deliver good games. Ubisoft on the other hand

. as for console games, i actually buy my xbox stuff

but for PC i always download (exceptions made for HL2 and doom3). You should check out Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30 for the xbox, yes it's WWII fps, but trust me, this one is...."different".

**TheDave** · 02-23-2005, 10:44 AM

Originally Posted by speeddemon5988

No, it's a different in the aspects that I mentioned, but the plot will obviously be the same, WWII, and the MOH franchise, in my opinion has made particalrly few improvemnets as far as other aspects of the game, like map design, and graphics. I didn't really mean to start an argument, I was just saying what I thouhgt about WWII games, and I think I'll shut my mouth because I just played Call of Duty at my friend's house, and it was a pretty decent game. MOH on the other hand... EA is just pumping out new ones every few months it seems to make more money. Money is good of course, but I'd rather have a quality game.

I know this is a filesharing forum, but I'm kind of thinking about console games. I haven't paid for a PC game in years, nor have I complained about a game I didn't pay for.

danny?