A 3 car length distance at 120 km/h is way too close. There should be at least 3 seconds between you and the car in front.
A 3 car length distance at 120 km/h is way too close. There should be at least 3 seconds between you and the car in front.
Last edited by Virtualbody1234; 04-24-2005 at 01:43 AM.
it was rush hour...Traffic...Originally Posted by Virtualbody1234
damn you guys abuse carsOriginally Posted by rossco
my little league team laughed at me camry today
truck was outta gas, so I took the ole toyota, and they just loved it
one kid looks at it....says "WHAT IS THAT?!?!?"
but.....WE WON! WOOHOO! think I'll drive it to more games now
(tis much more sanitary than not changin socks for the ole superstition in me)
rush hour at 120 kph?Originally Posted by jaigandhi5
whatever you say the accident could have been avoided had he followed the guidelines
I don't care if it was the Monaco Grand Prix, he was too close.Originally Posted by jaigandhi5
The fact that other people drive too close as well changes nothing. In fact it's even more reason for driving properly. It gives you time to slow more gradually and prevent the arsewhole whose tailgating you from causing an unnecessary crash ( I delierately avoid using the word accident here).
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
it's still an accident if it's due to carelessness
Not on the road, it's now an incident (in the UK). Ask the people who have to go clear up the mess. They don't attend an RTA now, they attend an RTI.Originally Posted by GepperRankins
There are no accidents anymore coz there is always at least someone or something at fault. If it's something at fault, then it's someone's fault that the thing went wrong.
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
that means there's no such thing as an accident then, as i've never heard an "act of god" referred to as an accident.
what if theres a wild animal involved?
there is = there's or theres?
Depends just how wild it is.
What annoyed it.
"there's" coz you dropped the "i". Same as "wasn't", didn't" etc.
However you have a problem with tense, assuming the incident is not currently taking place.
Last edited by Mr JP Fugley; 04-24-2005 at 03:25 PM.
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
the event is hypothetical so it's niether past, present or future
Bookmarks