View Poll Results: Should consenting adults be able to enjoy sexual relations with no legal constraint?

Voters
38. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    35 92.11%
  • No

    3 7.89%
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 62

Thread: Should two consenting adults be free...

  1. #11
    sArA's Avatar Ex-Moderatererer
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    4,589
    Quote Originally Posted by Barbarossa
    Quote Originally Posted by Sara
    On topic....

    I believe that anything goes providing that it is consensual of all parties.


    The Spanner case is an example of when the law gets involved in deciding what adults are and are not allowed to do to each other.

    (A little extreme but again consensual so who's business is it other than those involved?)
    I just had to read this is great depth because I've never heard of it and wondered what they were doing with their spanners...

    Now you know

  2. Lounge   -   #12
    manker's Avatar effendi
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    I wear an Even Steven wit
    Posts
    32,394
    What about one consenting adult?

    I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -

    --Good for them if they survive.

  3. Lounge   -   #13
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    15,893
    I almost forgot to vote in my own poll; I am amending that oversight now.

    Keep posting, people-there is another shoe, which I will drop soon enough.
    Last edited by j2k4; 09-15-2005 at 08:29 PM.
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain

  4. Lounge   -   #14
    Busyman's Avatar Use Logic Or STFU!!!
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Washington D.C.
    Posts
    13,716
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4
    I almost forgot to vote in my own poll; I am amending that oversight now.

    Keep posting, people-there is another shoe, which I will drop soon enough.
    I speak for us all when I say........NO SHIT.

    1. I just received new info on something everyone is cool with.
    2. I will post a poll for it and purposely hold off my obvious vote.
    3. Allow the yes votes to mount up.
    4. I then vote and allow more votes to mount up.
    5. Then I let them have it. I got them all. The voted Yes and with my new post of information....they realize they are wrong.



    Bring up adultery why don't you CaptainObvious.

    Marriage law....military law.....
    Last edited by Busyman; 09-15-2005 at 11:11 PM.
    Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!

    Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
    ---12323---4552-----
    2133--STRENGTH--8310
    344---5--5301---3232

  5. Lounge   -   #15
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    15,893
    Quote Originally Posted by Busyman
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4
    I almost forgot to vote in my own poll; I am amending that oversight now.

    Keep posting, people-there is another shoe, which I will drop soon enough.
    I speak for us all when I say........NO SHIT.

    1. I just received new info on something everyone is cool with.
    2. I will post a poll for it and purposely hold off my obvious vote.
    3. Allow the yes votes to mount up.
    4. I then vote and allow more votes to mount up.
    5. Then I let them have it. I got them all. The voted Yes and with my new post of information....they realize they are wrong.



    Bring up adultery why don't you CaptainObvious.

    Marriage law....military law.....
    Nah.

    But I did just read about a case of incest that "Lawrence...", as written, protects.

    The offenders seem to be fine candidates for a "Get Out of Jail Free" card, and would presumably resume their prior intimacy.

    They are brother and sister, born to the same set of biological parents.

    Neat, huh?
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain

  6. Lounge   -   #16
    Busyman's Avatar Use Logic Or STFU!!!
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Washington D.C.
    Posts
    13,716
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4
    Quote Originally Posted by Busyman
    I speak for us all when I say........NO SHIT.

    1. I just received new info on something everyone is cool with.
    2. I will post a poll for it and purposely hold off my obvious vote.
    3. Allow the yes votes to mount up.
    4. I then vote and allow more votes to mount up.
    5. Then I let them have it. I got them all. The voted Yes and with my new post of information....they realize they are wrong.



    Bring up adultery why don't you CaptainObvious.

    Marriage law....military law.....
    Nah.

    But I did just read about a case of incest that "Lawrence...", as written, protects.

    The offenders seem to be fine candidates for a "Get Out of Jail Free" card, and would presumably resume their prior intimacy.

    They are brother and sister, born to the same set of biological parents.

    Neat, huh?
    Hmmm...incest. I disagree.

    Marriage law was a better fit.

    If a dude wants to fuck around on his wife, she would have no grounds for divorce or anything.

    It also would trample on Mormon's rights.

    Not a slam dunk j2. Not a slam dunk.
    Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!

    Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
    ---12323---4552-----
    2133--STRENGTH--8310
    344---5--5301---3232

  7. Lounge   -   #17
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    15,893
    Quote Originally Posted by Busyman
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4

    Nah.

    But I did just read about a case of incest that "Lawrence...", as written, protects.

    The offenders seem to be fine candidates for a "Get Out of Jail Free" card, and would presumably resume their prior intimacy.

    They are brother and sister, born to the same set of biological parents.

    Neat, huh?
    Hmmm...incest. I disagree.

    Marriage law was a better fit.

    If a dude wants to fuck around on his wife, she would have no grounds for divorce or anything.

    It also would trample on Mormon's rights.

    Not a slam dunk j2. Not a slam dunk.
    So, you're okay with incest?

    Lawrence v. Texas makes no appropriate distinction; indeed, it makes none at all...

    I don't take your hoops analogy.
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain

  8. Lounge   -   #18
    Busyman's Avatar Use Logic Or STFU!!!
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Washington D.C.
    Posts
    13,716
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4
    Quote Originally Posted by Busyman
    Hmmm...incest. I disagree.

    Marriage law was a better fit.

    If a dude wants to fuck around on his wife, she would have no grounds for divorce or anything.

    It also would trample on Mormon's rights.

    Not a slam dunk j2. Not a slam dunk.
    So, you're okay with incest?

    Lawrence v. Texas makes no appropriate distinction; indeed, it makes none at all...

    I don't take your hoops analogy.
    Incest between two consenting adult should not be illegal.

    Why do you deem it such? 'Cause of the possibility of birth defects in a child born of the two? That is the only compelling reason I could think of.

    What if I had a threesome with 2 sisters and they licked each other. Is that illegal?
    Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!

    Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
    ---12323---4552-----
    2133--STRENGTH--8310
    344---5--5301---3232

  9. Lounge   -   #19
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    15,893
    Quote Originally Posted by Busyman
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4

    So, you're okay with incest?

    Lawrence v. Texas makes no appropriate distinction; indeed, it makes none at all...

    I don't take your hoops analogy.
    Incest between two consenting adult should not be illegal.

    Why do you deem it such? 'Cause of the possibility of birth defects in a child born of the two? That is the only compelling reason I could think of.

    What if I had a threesome with 2 sisters and they licked each other. Is that illegal?
    If one of these sisters had a dick?

    You bet.
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain

  10. Lounge   -   #20
    Busyman's Avatar Use Logic Or STFU!!!
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Washington D.C.
    Posts
    13,716
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4
    Quote Originally Posted by Busyman
    Incest between two consenting adult should not be illegal.

    Why do you deem it such? 'Cause of the possibility of birth defects in a child born of the two? That is the only compelling reason I could think of.

    What if I had a threesome with 2 sisters and they licked each other. Is that illegal?
    If one of these sisters had a dick?

    You bet.


    No really.
    Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!

    Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
    ---12323---4552-----
    2133--STRENGTH--8310
    344---5--5301---3232

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •