After this, the rest of your post is superfluous.Originally Posted by Busyman
I would not have picked you, of all people, to choose this stance...
Yes
No
After this, the rest of your post is superfluous.Originally Posted by Busyman
I would not have picked you, of all people, to choose this stance...
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Sighhhhh.Originally Posted by j2k4
Why should it be illegal j? Do I have to buy a vowel or what?
It's the birth defect thingie, right?
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
Two consenting adults should be allowed to do whatever they wish together.
Laws need only serve the purpose of the common good.
It is within the common good to disallow close relatives to marry (or have sex), as it causes proven compounding defects and mutations.
Hopefully that would be j2's answer....since he conveniently chose not to thus far. It really is starting to bore me.Originally Posted by sparsely
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
In my mind the goverment should stay out of our bedrooms , no shit sherlck incest is wrong . I and most civilized people would not argue with your point ,
Do kissing cousins count ? Or do the Euore's have corner on the market ? Fuckers have being it for centuries , explains the big ears !
Last edited by peat moss; 09-17-2005 at 05:28 AM.
Sorry to keep you waiting-Originally Posted by Busyman
Yes, it is the "birth defect thingie".
You yourself said it was "the only compelling reason...", correct?
If you'll forgive my surmise, I'm fairly sure that, ostensibly, at least, compelling reasons are those which result in law being written and enacted, yes?
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Just so, peat, but aren't laws written for the less-civilized amongst us?Originally Posted by peat moss
Would that everyone was possessed of your sterling character and moral fortitude, but, alas...
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
On the subject I voted yes. Consenting adults should have absolute freedom to do what they want in private whether we approve or not, and it seems odd to me that certainly in the US the ones that wish laws to interfere with this are the ones that hate government interference in their own lives.Originally Posted by j2k4
Entertain me here J2.
It appears in this thread that you believe incest should illegal be based on the higher risk of birth defects.Originally Posted by j2k4
Given this, do you think that it should be legal ( repugnant as it may be) for homosexual incest between consenting adults?
What if one or both consenting adult opposite sex siblings were sterile and there was a zero percent chance of pregnancy?( repugnant as it may be)
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
I appoligze for the Euro crack I meant royalty . In a perfect world its the role of the parents to teach right or wrong but if Bobs your mom and dads your uncle ..........
"Insert Duelling banjos here "
There.Originally Posted by vidcc
Are you not entertained?
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Bookmarks