-
Retired
-
-
05-03-2006, 10:06 PM
Software & Hardware -
#2
-
-
05-03-2006, 10:15 PM
Software & Hardware -
#3
Retired
Beats me. =/
So your saying I should just ignore it right? I went into the frag sheild and it said the recommended size for my MFT is 161MB, while it's at 125MB right now. I have a feeling changing it won't make a difference. I mean, the HDD is just going to continue to fill up anyway.
I just don't wanna break something...
-
-
05-03-2006, 10:17 PM
Software & Hardware -
#4
-
-
05-03-2006, 10:23 PM
Software & Hardware -
#5
-
-
05-03-2006, 10:26 PM
Software & Hardware -
#6
-
-
05-03-2006, 10:55 PM
Software & Hardware -
#7
-
-
05-04-2006, 02:42 AM
Software & Hardware -
#8
Hammer Smashed Face
well, I have not had any problems, so i think its safe to assume that DK only has our best interest at heart. After all, I do believe that the maker of DK are the ones who created the integrated windows defrag program that is part of windows, only the windows version is old and shitty
Last edited by Mïcrösöül°V³; 05-04-2006 at 02:43 AM.
-
-
05-04-2006, 04:16 AM
Software & Hardware -
#9
I do that on every computer I work on other than the time it takes, as I do a boot defrag as well never noticed a difference . The padding does take for ever eh .
I set it to defrag every nite at 3:00 am so I don't have to worry .
-
-
05-04-2006, 04:47 AM
Software & Hardware -
#10
re-member
BT Rep: +1
..mostly it occurs after long usage without a reboot..I always first reboot my computer/s, then run diskeeper, and then if it still gives an "MFT" usage is to high warning, that's the time, for me to expand the MFT. Of course you can allow diskeeper to run "on the fly", in which case you will probably never see that warning...
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks