Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345
Results 41 to 46 of 46

Thread: Pentium Vs Amd

  1. #41
    _John_Lennon_'s Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Strawberry Fields
    Posts
    1,176
    Yeah, for anyone who is still in the dark, and thinks that Intels are soo cool and sooo L33T because they have higher Mhz, I take it you havnt been informed of the speed trap you've fallen into.

    Here is a link that explains things a bit.

    Intel's Speed Trap

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #42
    Originally posted by Cl1mh4224rd@31 July 2003 - 21:16
    I'd say the Athlon XP 3000+ holds its own pretty damn well for being nearly a full GHz "slower" than the top P4. In fact, it actually beats the P4 3.06 GHz chip in UT2k3.

    Intel really should be ashamed...
    i couldn't agree more

    i was talking to lamsey though
    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>BLAH</span>

    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>Wayne Rooney - A thug and a thief</span>

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #43
    Ex-member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    5,450
    Originally posted by 3rd gen noob@31 July 2003 - 02:00
    http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/..._charts-22.html

    http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/..._charts-23.html

    http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/..._charts-24.html

    oh, well

    i suppose a difference of 3000 in 3d mark isn&#39;t really that much

    3D mark is not the way to compare CPU power; it&#39;s far more dependant on other factors such as the video card, RAM, etc. A CPU that is 1.5 times faster will not give you 1.5 times the 3dMark performance.


    Try looking at the CPU benchmarks instead: http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030217/..._charts-28.html

    they give a much more accurate representation of the proportional relation between CPUs, and as you can see, they correlate fairly well with the model numbers, although the 3000+ lags because the SiSoft benchmarks hadn&#39;t been optimised for the 3000+ at the time of printing.

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #44
    _John_Lennon_'s Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Strawberry Fields
    Posts
    1,176
    Yeah, it was also the only one of the Barton&#39;s tested at the time I bleieve.

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #45
    pentium without a doubt, athlon even the barton type are just over and over clocked original athlons, they run to hot as a result and die pre-maturely, believe me i know as i repair and build pc&#39;s and rarely get an intel processor that is knackered, amd based pc&#39;s that i get on the other hand i&#39;d say three out of ten are the chip burnt out, normally just out of warranty but not always, if you must buy an amd then get a pretty damn big overclocking cooling fan. perfomance wise there is little between them.

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #46
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1,548
    How many of you remember the only Proccessor with L3 cache?


    AMD K-6 III

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •