Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 54

Thread: Looks like I made it

  1. #31
    Skweeky's Avatar Manker's web totty
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    11,052
    I has, they is being mean to me

  2. Lounge   -   #32
    Biggles's Avatar Looking for loopholes
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Age
    67
    Posts
    8,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Skweeky View Post
    On a Saturday?
    Possibly not - my bad as the Merkins say. I am in on the 14th.
    Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum


  3. Lounge   -   #33
    Skweeky's Avatar Manker's web totty
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    11,052
    Ah well, we can potentially do the 15th then. It's just after RF's 56th birthday

  4. Lounge   -   #34
    Biggles's Avatar Looking for loopholes
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Age
    67
    Posts
    8,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Skweeky View Post
    I has, they is being mean to me
    This seems unreasonable as you are a lady with teh child. You has rights.
    Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum


  5. Lounge   -   #35
    Biggles's Avatar Looking for loopholes
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Age
    67
    Posts
    8,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Skweeky View Post
    Ah well, we can potentially do the 15th then. It's just after RF's 56th birthday
    I will take note and see if I can be there.
    Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum


  6. Lounge   -   #36
    Skweeky's Avatar Manker's web totty
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    11,052
    It seems them rights don't really do all that much for teh ladies with the childs.
    It seems turning down a a flexible hours request for part time work on the grounds of it not fitting business requirements is perfectly valid. Even if the person who did the job before me only worked part time.
    It also seems it is perfectly ok to announce redundancies and then request said lady with teh child to work hours she can't possibly adhere to due to nursery opening times. It seems getting rid of an extra person that way to cut cost is acceptable
    It seems bastard companies get away with fucking murder.

    /rant over

  7. Lounge   -   #37
    Skweeky's Avatar Manker's web totty
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    11,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Biggles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Skweeky View Post
    Ah well, we can potentially do the 15th then. It's just after RF's 56th birthday
    I will take note and see if I can be there.
    Eggselent

  8. Lounge   -   #38
    Skweeky's Avatar Manker's web totty
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    11,052
    edit: wrong thread
    Last edited by Skweeky; 07-21-2009 at 10:03 PM.

  9. Lounge   -   #39
    Biggles's Avatar Looking for loopholes
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Age
    67
    Posts
    8,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Skweeky View Post
    It seems them rights don't really do all that much for teh ladies with the childs.
    It seems turning down a a flexible hours request for part time work on the grounds of it not fitting business requirements is perfectly valid. Even if the person who did the job before me only worked part time.
    It also seems it is perfectly ok to announce redundancies and then request said lady with teh child to work hours she can't possibly adhere to due to nursery opening times. It seems getting rid of an extra person that way to cut cost is acceptable
    It seems bastard companies get away with fucking murder.

    /rant over
    Old trick - it is actually "constructive dismissal" and against the law. I'm guessing you don't have a Union there.

    Changing your hours knowing you have child care commitments is not acceptable.
    Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum


  10. Lounge   -   #40
    Skweeky's Avatar Manker's web totty
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    11,052
    They're not changing my hours, they are wanting me to do the exact same as before and stick to a shift pattern between 8Am and 5.30 PM. Problem is; nursery hours are between 8 and 6 and I live a 45 minute drive away.

    I know about constructive dismissal but what I've read about it, it seems rather difficult to prove. On top of that, I am already in the last 3 months of my mat leave so I don't get paid anymore, so unless JP is going to offer me his epic lawyering skills, I don't know how to afford taking the thing to a tribunal.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •