I said an extra 64 bits 192 + 128 = 64 See if yuo can figure it out now Samaurai.Originally posted by Samurai@24 April 2004 - 16:14
Who mentioned 64 bitrates?!?!??
I said an extra 64 bits 192 + 128 = 64 See if yuo can figure it out now Samaurai.Originally posted by Samurai@24 April 2004 - 16:14
Who mentioned 64 bitrates?!?!??
I said an extra 64 bits 192 + 128 = 64 [/b][/quote]Originally posted by Arm+24 April 2004 - 16:18--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Arm @ 24 April 2004 - 16:18)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Samurai@24 April 2004 - 16:14
Who mentioned 64 bitrates?!?!??
Actually.It is 192 - 128 = 64.
And I see no EXTRA word in the post you're referring to
Edit - Post Included
Originally posted by Arm
Why dont we just do a neutral point of view and say use whatever bitrate you feel is best?
Where are you people are getting these ideas that 64 bits is going to make a highly compressed audio file cd quality? Maybe with some proof ill join you. But all I need is proof.
Actually if you want to get technical, neither bit rate is cd quality since it's lossy compression.
Actually.It is 192 - 128 = 64. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by FuNkY CaPrIcOrN+24 April 2004 - 16:19--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (FuNkY CaPrIcOrN @ 24 April 2004 - 16:19)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by Arm@24 April 2004 - 16:18
<!--QuoteBegin-Samurai@24 April 2004 - 16:14
Who mentioned 64 bitrates?!?!??
I said an extra 64 bits 192 + 128 = 64
Oh damn your right. If I actually cared ide edit my post but you all went to elementary school so you should know your addition and subtraction.
Oh damn your right. If I actually cared ide edit my post but you all went to elementary school so you should know your addition and subtraction. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by Arm+24 April 2004 - 16:25--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Arm @ 24 April 2004 - 16:25)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by FuNkY CaPrIcOrN@24 April 2004 - 16:19
Originally posted by Arm@24 April 2004 - 16:18
<!--QuoteBegin-Samurai@24 April 2004 - 16:14
Who mentioned 64 bitrates?!?!??
I said an extra 64 bits 192 + 128 = 64
Actually.It is 192 - 128 = 64.
Thank you.
it is unpossible
and 128ks suc!!!!!!!!!
A long as the khz is 44 then the quality will be the same or at least similar. Unless you got really good speakers and soundcard and do a side-by-side comparison you wont really find any difference between 192k and 128k. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by Arm+24 April 2004 - 22:51--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Arm @ 24 April 2004 - 22:51)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Formula1@24 April 2004 - 13:37
im wondering if there is a program that i can use to enhance a 128 kb audio file to a 192 kb quality file ?
@ Arm: You REALLY need to check your hearing.... there is a BIG quality differance btw 128 and 192, if you need proof get the same song in different bitrates and play it... even on your shitty 5 Watt pc-speakers you should notice...
If you're in this game to show off how many mp3's you can collect on your hard-drive then I guess your lousy bitrates is ok... hell just rip the mp3's to 64 bps if you wanna. However, if you're in it for the music, like some of us, you should put your honour in not having ANYTHING below 192
-GoR-
Bookmarks