Oh-Originally posted by Alex H@2 August 2004 - 20:49
Clinton didn't have an overwhelming need to invade Iraq. Perhaps that was because he knew it was more about politics than dangerous weapons, and decided it would be better to leave the whole thing alone...
Clinton's in play again?
Okay:
Why is it okay to adopt a policy of "regime change" as regards Iraq, then sit on the sidelines and wait for the U.N. to carry the ball?
Or was he too smart to accept his own "dare"?
Clinton had no trouble mustering a few ill-chosen targets for his cruise missiles, but only after getting his own missile sufficiently polished and being found out.
Now, that fairly reeks of legitimacy, doesn't it?
Funny how this just gets a pass from all of you....oh, that's right......no one died.
I wonder how many Iraqi babies went without milk, though?
I've heard thousands died for want of that factory's production.
BTW-I'm running for President of the United States on the Anybody But Bush OR Kerry ticket.
Can I count on you guys?
You know it makes sense.
Bookmarks