[FOOTBALL] Chelsea to sack Mutu

[manker]

guys guys...... it's just a game

I'm not actually sure if we're discussing football.

I'm waiting for Yogi to explain what he means. Then I'll probably argue with him.

[Yogi]

guys guys...... it's just a game

You are right.

This is just a game.

Football however is what the world is all about.

[manker]

Okay, you done me in now.

You seem to need a lot of stfu.

I will, but only cos i hate signlanguage.

You [ posing to...] not understanding me and your craving for proof again

say more than i can ever prove.


But remember me: So your statement/my quote was not about Man U?????


You sound like you've been drinking, btw.

If not, sorry, makes me even more concerned.



yogi

FFS.

No. Porto - a small club with limited funds - won the European Cup. Indicating that money doesn't always matter in football, this was my point.

I've not been drinking. I get easily irritated when people are evasive.

So now do you see why I couldn't understand you, I was not posing. Your point did not make any sense.

[Yogi]

I'm not actually sure if we're discussing football.

I'm waiting for Yogi to explain what he means. Then I'll probably argue with him.

I did, but you seem to need translation.

Though more likely transplantation .. ... .......

Fill in the blanks.

[Yogi]

FFS.

No. Porto - a small club with limited funds - won the European Cup. Indicating that money doesn't always matter in football, this was my point.

I've not been drinking. I get easily irritated when people are evasive.

So now do you see why I couldn't understand you, I was not posing. Your point did not make any sense.

Could you please point out to me where i said money buys championships???

And evasive, please!!!!

You get irritated when strongly opiniated people don't get intimidated

by your lack of reading/listening, hence flawed accusations.

I try to read between your lines and respond to what you come off sounding

like.

Did you ever think it could be you being evasive???

Really, if you do have a point, i am the first to acknowledge.

However, up till now all you do is argue for arguments sake, hence my

feeling you were sauced.

Yogi

[Yogi]

Btw. i'm really off now.

I clearly overestimated you.

My bad.


yogi

[manker]

Hang on. You said football is all about money. I said that Porto won the Euro cup.

It's a fair point.

It got skewed because you thought Manchester won the European cup and so posted a reply which made no sense. I asked for clarification of what you meant.

I had to ask 4 times before you mentioned that you thought Man Utd won the European cup. You were clearly being evasive because you didn't know!

Each time you asked something of me, I responded clearly. You did exactly the opposite. You were evasive and it irritated me.

Now you've clarified I can point out where you were wrong. It's here:



YOU DIDN'T KNOW WHO WON THE EUROPEAN CUP SO YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE JUDGED MY POINTS BASED ON AN ASSUMPTION.

I think it's funny

Edit: You're forcefully arguing in a football thread and you don't know who won the European Cup

Edit2:

[DanB]

The owner of Chelsea has enough money so thats no problem. I wonder if for example a dutch team (dutch clubs dont have that much money) bought him for this amount of money and he is caught on drugs. Is it possible they can get the money back?

From who?

They can't claim it back off the club they paid it too, its not their fault. I really don't think they'd be able to try and claim it back from the player either

[Yogi]

Hang on. You said football is all about money. I said that Porto won the Euro cup.

It's a fair point.

It got skewed because you thought Manchester won the European cup and so posted a reply which made no sense. I asked for clarification of what you meant.

I had to ask 4 times before you mentioned that you thought Man Utd won the European cup. You were clearly being evasive because you didn't know!

Each time you asked something of me, I responded clearly. You did exactly the opposite. You were evasive and it irritated me.

Now you've clarified I can point out where you were wrong. It's here:



YOU DIDN'T KNOW WHO WON THE EUROPEAN CUP SO YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE JUDGED MY POINTS BASED ON AN ASSUMPTION.

I think it's funny

Edit: You're forcefully arguing in a football thread and you don't know who won the European Cup

Edit2:

Sorry, but i am a big footballfan.

Been following football closely since '68.

Seen about 45 european matches, mostly Ajax.

Still follow football around the globe, incl. england.

Again, show me where i said i thought Man won the Champion's Leauge.

You keep making my point: You don't read!!!!


Yogi

Edit 3: Your edit 2 mostly reflects on yourself.

[DanB]

The Champions League had nothing to do with it, it was the European Cup that is being disputed