Strange you would say that as the U.S. along with other nations are trying to work out the situation with the Iranians and the Koreans.Originally Posted by Strangelove
Strange you would say that as the U.S. along with other nations are trying to work out the situation with the Iranians and the Koreans.Originally Posted by Strangelove
then that would be covered byOriginally Posted by 15%
no he won't because it's the wrong thing to do. or no but he should
he is obviously making an issue of it.
if you have no interest the option is there....just don't vote.
Last edited by vidcc; 11-22-2004 at 05:38 PM.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
but the question was "will bush send troops in"Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
if you think he won't choose "no because it's the wrong thing to do"
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
are any not voting because it's not anonomous......
i can't put every single option in there , it would be a mile long, so i put "bulk" options there. If you make a vote but wish to expand you have that ability.
Last edited by vidcc; 11-22-2004 at 05:28 PM.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
Vid I didn’t vote because I’m trying to see which one best describes how I feel about the situation.
As for the voting not being anonymous I think that they should all be public. If someone votes one way in this poll and says something different we need to hold them accountable for their voting record
Last edited by BigBank_Hank; 11-22-2004 at 05:40 PM.
I have never been to iran
but i have two good friends how are refuguees from there
they are good friends
Last edited by zedaxax; 11-22-2004 at 05:35 PM.
Strange, the EU seems to be doing well until the US puts it's foot in and makes things go backwards.. How many times have the EU and Iran come to an agreement that is satisfactory to the UN and then the USA have blocked it so far this year?Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
This brings us back to the start each time... so making the situation, like everything else in the Middle East the US touches at the moment, worse.
As i said, as the only country that actually refuses to allow inspections (except Israel)... as far as im concerned, USA are the outlaw state here, not Iran.
Last edited by Strangelove; 11-22-2004 at 05:51 PM.
If you can’t see to difference between the U.S. and Iran’s nuclear program then you need help.
True...Originally Posted by BigBank_Hank
The USA have enough to blow the entire planet apart 10 times over and are continuing to develop them.
Iran havent got 1 nuke..
The USA refuses to allow the relevant UN agency to inspect any of their facilities, Iran is open to inspection.
Quite a difference.
Its the USA's program that would be under suspicion in any non-biased atmosphere in these circumstances.
Good point. When was last time we used nukes? What's the point of the US getting inspected? Cause everyone else does? We already admit we've got a shitload.Originally Posted by Strangelove
Also Bush is not a madman, he's an idiot without a clue.
Get it right.
Last edited by Busyman; 11-22-2004 at 07:40 PM.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
Bookmarks