Never read one, but seen the 1st 2 movies..Originally Posted by vidcc
In those 2 movies there was more Christian than wiccan, in that there was zero wiccan content, but one of Harry's family was wearing a crucifix i think
Never read one, but seen the 1st 2 movies..Originally Posted by vidcc
In those 2 movies there was more Christian than wiccan, in that there was zero wiccan content, but one of Harry's family was wearing a crucifix i think
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
I think they should go back to burning witches. It would never happen because the Newcastle 'Broon' Brewery have a large say in politics.
The best way to keep a secret:- Tell everyone not to tell anyone.
Originally Posted by Busyman
Read the context i first put it in.
With so much violence, sex, drugs and George Bush (read bad idiotic politics) on TV why are people worried about a book like Harry Potter.
as long as they ban all other religious books too
Originally Posted by Busyman
bonkers!!!
It amazes and amuses me to think that they oblige educationists to teach science and fantasy in the same context!
In the case above, i think its only fair that wiccans etc also have a fair crack of the whip.Originally Posted by Sara
Maybe we should use the same methods in the same states to teach witchcraft
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
Of course there will be a challenge in the supreme court that should stop the practice if it is occurring.Originally Posted by Busyman
Edit: unless i missed it and it got through
Give it 2 more resignations on the court and it will
Last edited by vidcc; 07-17-2005 at 03:45 PM.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
I prefer my idea.Originally Posted by vidcc
I'm sure they'd withdraw the demand of its being taught at all, if all religions were given the same status.
An It Harm None, Do What You Will
Actually I think they would fight against it. The question was asked if the ten commandments were allowed to be displayed in courts would they also allow a Buddha...they said no because it is not American Judaic/Christian tradition... Apparently freedom of religion in public is the for the Christian faith onlyOriginally Posted by Rat Faced
Last edited by vidcc; 07-17-2005 at 04:29 PM.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/22sch01.htm
merkin christian fundamentalists are always good for a laugh. i wish i was a merkin schoolboy, so i could be an argumentative little shit in "science" classes
Bookmarks