Originally Posted by
Busyman
Again really?
I missed nothing. You said the remark was warranted but it was quite the opposite since the numbers and where/who they come from were the point of the article and therefore not an "admission" of anything by the topic starter.
Run-On
So you did not merely point out something. You said it was warranted.
U wa wong
-said the Chinese man
mmk?
Sorry, l didn't realise you were that slow, let me explain to you carefully, try to keep up, OK?
l said ... "When l went to school 4 x 9 was 36, near enough to 37 to warrant his remark." ... did you get that, l said his REMARK was warranted, not his assumption.
Bookmarks