Tracker Accounts being disabled due to Inactivity

[FatBob]

disabling an account with 0up/0dwn is ok , but disabling a power user or account with a decent ratio due to inactivity is bad :/

[TankGrrl]

if im not gonna use the tracker anytime soon i'll download the smallest file available and seed that on 'low' in utorrent. i assumed everyone did this.. i dont trust just logging in, and this way i don't even have to log in

disabling an account with 0up/0dwn is ok , but disabling a power user or account with a decent ratio due to inactivity is bad :/

this happened to me once on a very good tracker that i had a pretty high gb/ratio on. my machine died and by the time i started getting back to trackers with my new machine i missed the cut off for it, even though i made sure to login after i got my new setup. but just logging in and doing messages wasnt enough and i lost a really good account which i have yet to get back but S happens...

i keep a list of the trackers i dont use daily and make sure to login, seed some and participate no matter what. the ones i use all the time i dont have to worry about

[aysomc]

i dont force myself to go to any trackers, if i naturally dont go to a tracker for long enough that its disabled i probably dont need or want it.

[munkyboy04]

surley if you not using a site after 42 days then you dont need it. may as well let that account die and someone who does need it use it?

[fstokebanget]

which tracker that ask you to also do the download/upload and not only login the the web ?

[broomhead]

well if I don't want to be active on the tracker, I either giveaway my account or just ditch it. There is no point in keeping something that I won't use, if I am on vacation, I will try my hardest just to view the site once a week. But for BitMe I get a frend to seed a torrent for me once a week. (for like 10 min)