Your Ad Here Your Ad Here
Arcade NZBs WTO Guides Forums Home
Welcome to FileSharing Talk.  ( Register | Log in )
SuperNews Special   SeedPlace Special

   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
4play
  #1 Old 03-08-2008, 08:38 AM
 
4play's Avatar
knob jockey
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London
Age: 27
Posts: 5,529
england Send a message via MSN to 4play
Kde 4
If you use Linux and have not been living under a rock for the past few months then you might just have heard about the latest version of KDE that is meant to change the world.

So who has used KDE 4 so far and what do you think of it?

To tell you the truth it has not lived up to the hype. I know its still really for testers at this stage and it wont be production ready until it hits 4.1 but i am still dissapointed.

My main disappointment is the fact i still cant get those fancy desktop effects working. Im blaming this more on the ati drivers but its still a pain.

There are a few nice new features that make life easier and prettier. Being able to use css and svg in desktop apps makes things like the system monitor look very nice indeed.


also the inclusion of a gui to renice processes can be a great help.


The lack of any stable applications that use QT4 properly also seems to be a bit of a sticking point at the minute but im sure there will be a whole plethora of them soon. Im still using a lot of the older kde3 applications like amarok 1.4.8 since the 2.0 branch is pretty much unusable at the minute.

Anyway in closing this KDE4 shows great promise but its not quite there yet. I would wait until a major Kde based distro included it or it hits the 4.1 mark before using it as your main desktop.
__________________

Bad Software
Reply With Quote 4play is offline  
Click to Register Registering will remove these ads.
Click to Register
Sponsored Links

Your Ad Here Giganews Newsgroups Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here Unlimited Usenet
Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here RapidPeer.com Managed Seedbox Services Your Ad Here
Nihil
  Linux Software   -   #2 Old 03-08-2008, 08:49 AM
Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 32
BT Rep: +1
I have similar opinions of Kde 4. I've tested it starting from the alpha releases and it was very unstable once, now it seems to be stabilized still not enough to use as a main desktop. It's all nice and good, but it's still not the "big thing" I've been waiting for a long time. I'll wait a lot I guess. Nowadays I'm only using Windows but when 4.1 releases I'll install Archlinux (my favorite distro) again to see how it's like.
Reply With Quote Nihil is offline  
yozshura
  Linux Software   -   #3 Old 03-30-2008, 01:32 PM
 
yozshura's Avatar
Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 58
Super buggy at time i tested it (2 months ago) and doesn't offer better usability than 3.5 , ditched right away after installation.

It's better to wait for 4.1 ...
Reply With Quote yozshura is offline  
TidusBlade
  Linux Software   -   #4 Old 03-30-2008, 03:23 PM
 
TidusBlade's Avatar
Watermelon Knight
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melon Island
Age: 16
Posts: 240
BT Rep: +3
iraq Send a message via MSN to TidusBlade
I tried it when the Kubuntu KDE4 came out, looks awesome
But it's not as good as KDE3.5 at the moment, many programs arent perfect and it's missing quite alot of things. so Ill just wait for KDE4.1 or 4.2 as yozshura said...
Reply With Quote TidusBlade is offline  
tknaught
  Linux Software   -   #5 Old 04-15-2008, 04:44 AM
 
tknaught's Avatar
Rep : -1.000.000
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 145
I tried using KDE4's zoom function, and it turned my screen black. The only way to fix the problem was to log in with a recovery terminal and delete my entire profile.

Many of the options for configuring panels that are present in 3.x are not yet implemented, so there is limited customization possible.

I also think that the SUSE-style menu system is really annoying to navigate, especially when using a touchpad.

Anyway, it seems to have a long way to go.
Reply With Quote tknaught is offline  
Xhester
  Linux Software   -   #6 Old 04-20-2008, 09:52 PM
 
Xhester's Avatar
Linux Lover
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 102
BT Rep: +4
I dont like KDE Gnome is much better
__________________
"Software is like sex: it's better when it's free"
Linus Torvalds

Reply With Quote Xhester is offline  
markys
  Linux Software   -   #7 Old 04-27-2008, 04:05 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
I tried KDE when it was in beta stage and then when it came out officially, and there was always some annoying bugs, and there is far less options than KDE 3...
Reply With Quote markys is offline  
Xhester
  Linux Software   -   #8 Old 04-28-2008, 04:55 AM
 
Xhester's Avatar
Linux Lover
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 102
BT Rep: +4
Quote:
Originally Posted by markys View Post
I tried KDE when it was in beta stage and then when it came out officially, and there was always some annoying bugs, and there is far less options than KDE 3...
Yh, i use Gnome but if i had to chose i will choose KDE 3.5
__________________
"Software is like sex: it's better when it's free"
Linus Torvalds

Reply With Quote Xhester is offline  
albcamus
  Linux Software   -   #9 Old 07-11-2008, 03:26 PM
n00b
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by tknaught View Post
I tried using KDE4's zoom function, and it turned my screen black. The only way to fix the problem was to log in with a recovery terminal and delete my entire profile.

Many of the options for configuring panels that are present in 3.x are not yet implemented, so there is limited customization possible.

I also think that the SUSE-style menu system is really annoying to navigate, especially when using a touchpad.

Anyway, it seems to have a long way to go.
comparing to KDE3.5, KDE4 is really a bad one.

The konsole of KDE3 is fully customizable, allowing users to control everything as they want to. As for konsole of KDE4, Oh, you can't even define a keyboard shortcut for changing to a perticular tab! I mean, Tab 2 for example.

systemsettings is incapable, think about Kcontrol of KDE3, which allows you configure everything as you like.

I don't like KDE4, not at all. KDE4 is trying to catch up with, IMHO, Apple and Windows. But OTOH, betraying the Unix principles: “mechanism, not policy”. Why should Linux catch up with Apple OS or M$ Windows? Is KDE self-abased?

KDE4 developers are making policies for us, with no choice left for us. I'll run away from Linux in case that we have no other WM choice but KDE4.

Besides, I'm not a native English speaker. I came here by googling KDE4.

Last edited by albcamus; 07-11-2008 at 03:28 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply With Quote albcamus is offline  
wevotedno
  Linux Software   -   #10 Old 07-14-2008, 05:15 AM
 
wevotedno's Avatar
SeeD
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lvl10
Posts: 566
BT Rep: +45
jollyroger
I will stick with gnome. KDE reminds me too much of M$
__________________
The TRUTH lies within

Click
Reply With Quote wevotedno is offline  

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Your Ad Here Great Deals At NewEgg.com Your Ad Here

The time now is 09:44 AM

Page Generation Time0.12sec    Query Count9 queries Talkgold - Sexy Pictures - Money E-Books - Onlive Forum - Wallpapers for Zunes
Contact Us - FileSharing Talk - Archive - Disclaimer - Top

Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FileSharingTalk.com - All Rights Reserved