Your Ad Here Your Ad Here
Arcade NZBs WTO Guides Forums Home
Welcome to FileSharing Talk.  ( Register | Log in )
SuperNews Special   GigaNews Special

   

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Darth Sushi
  #1 Old 02-05-2010, 12:04 AM
 
Darth Sushi's Avatar
Sushi Lord
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Corisant
Posts: 2,975
Judge: ISP Not Responsible for Illegal Downloads (Australia)
Judge: ISP Not Responsible for Illegal Downloads (Australia)
By Kevin Parrish, published on February 4, 2010

" A Federal Judge ruled than an ISP can't be held responsible for what subscribers download, nor can it stop the process.

In its fight to beat down piracy, major Hollywood studios have demanded that a Federal Court hold an Australian Internet Service Provider responsible for illegal content--namely pirated movies and TV shows--downloaded by its customers. Studios such as Paramount, Disney, and Twentieth Century Fox hoped that the case would open the door to an enforcement of copyright protection rights on an ISP level.

However, Justice Dennis Cowdroy didn't hold iiNet, Australia's third-largest ISP, accountable for the alleged copyright infringement. In fact, the judge ruled that iiNet did not authorize the downloads of the copyrighted material, nor did it have to power to stop the process. Although Cowdroy acknowledged the presence of widespread copyright violations, he did say that these violations were not the responsibility of iiNet.

According to the AFP, the case in question stems around "thousands" of downloads taking place on iiNet's Perth-based network. In a period of 59 weeks starting June 2008, nearly 90 films and TV episodes were downloaded using BitTorrent including "Heroes" and "Batman Begins." However the current ruling deems that iiNet isn't even partially to blame for the copyright infringement even though it provided the bandwidth "vessel" for downloaders.

"The evidence establishes that copyright infringement of the applicants' films is occurring on a large scale, and I infer that such infringements are occurring worldwide," he said. "However, such fact does not necessitate or compel... a finding of authorization, merely because it is felt that 'something must be done' to stop the infringements."

The AFP reports that, after the ruling, there was a lot of excitement from ISP's standing outside the courtroom. There were also some "very long faces from the studios." "

Source: http://www.tomsguide.com/us/ISP-BitT...news-5733.html | http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100204...tcopyrightfilm
Reply With Quote Darth Sushi is offline  
Click to Register Registering will remove these ads.
Click to Register
Sponsored Links

Your Ad Here Giganews Newsgroups Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here Unlimited Usenet
Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here RapidPeer.com Managed Seedbox Services Your Ad Here
Cabalo
  News Section   -   #2 Old 02-05-2010, 02:59 AM
 
Cabalo's Avatar
The Bad Cop
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Age: 33
Posts: 6,615
BT Rep: +18
jollyroger
Now these are indeed great news!
This decision is one of the most important ones ever related to filesharing.
__________________

Reply With Quote Cabalo is offline  

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Your Ad Here Great Deals At NewEgg.com Your Ad Here

The time now is 05:39 AM

Page Generation Time0.06sec    Query Count9 queries Talkgold - Sexy Pictures - Money E-Books - Onlive Forum - Wallpapers for Zunes
Contact Us - FileSharing Talk - Archive - Disclaimer - Top

Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FileSharingTalk.com - All Rights Reserved