Shareaza
(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)Posted by: throbber
can somebody tell me the newest version, i'm useing 1.8.9.34.
only been useing it for a week and my cpu seems to be running at 80/%100 all the time.
Posted by: uNz[i]
Strange... I'm running the same version as you, and I've had no problems...CPU usage usually sits between 3-16% on my Athlon XP2200+
Just visited the download site...
Shareaza 1.9 Release Candidate (v1.8.10.2) is the latest version available.
Get it here (http://www.shareaza.com/download/).
Edit: typo
Posted by: mEtho
there is new version on my site as well
mEtho Inc (http://www.metho.2ya.com)
EDIT: this is my 300 post :beerchug:
Posted by: muchspl2
do you just use it for torrents? if so you might want to look into shad0w's client
http://home.elp.rr.com/tur/download.html
Posted by: throbber
yes it is strange as it was ok when i first installed it.
i'v just downloaded the newer one, after i finish downloading "prince the persia the sands of time" i will try it.
speeds up and down like a whores thong!!!!, only 96 hs to go. :D
Posted by: camille
Originally posted by throbber@5 December 2003 - 18:51
can somebody tell me the newest version, i'm useing 1.8.9.34.
only been useing it for a week and my cpu seems to be running at 80/%100 all the time.
Klite is better than Shareaza. It takes too long for a connection and rare in sources.
Posted by: uNz[i]
Not if you avoid the eD2k network, it isn't. :)
I've hardly ever had to queue using the G2 network and it kicks ass for BT downloads too.
It won't give you corrupted downloads either.
Posted by: muchspl2
whats the point of it if you only use it for bittorrent, you guys/gals need to look to better clients that support the torrents better
last .02
Posted by: uNz[i]
But who said we only use Shareaza for BT? :huh:
Posted by: DWk
i dont use shadow's tho :unsure:
i use burst
Posted by: camille
Not if you avoid the eD2k network, it isn't. :)
What is meant by this?
Posted by: uNz[i]
eD2k= eDonkey2000
In particular, the queues.
Waiting behind 1000 users makes for a far longer delay than the time it takes Shareaza to connect to any of the networks.... and I've had very little problem finding enough sources.