Post your IQ here!

[Seedler]

What's your IQ?

Post your IQ here!


Mine results differed from site to site, but on average it's approx. 110-120.:D

[Peerzy]

Mine results differed from site to site, but on average it's approx. 110-120.:D

Yes, because only a Einstein would let a website tell you how smart you are:lol:

[brotherdoobie]

Yes, because only a Einstein would let a website tell you how smart you are:lol:

You are so funny...:lol::lol::lol: No, really. :dry:


Peace bd

[Seedler]

Yes Peerzy, IQ tests do somewhat reflect a person's intelligence.

Btw, I bet you bomb these IQ tests, I guess that's why you detest these website?

[Samurai]

185

[brotherdoobie]

185

18.5 You forgot the decimal. :frusty:

Peace bd ;)

[Samurai]

No, I said it correct the first time.

Peace S ;)

[brotherdoobie]

Correctly...

Peace bd ;)

[Samurai]

Well I'm sure you can use both words in that sentence

Peace S ;)

[brotherdoobie]

Well I'm sure you can use both words in that sentence

Peace S ;)

I agree. Anyway, mankers sleeping. :)

Peace bd

[j2k4]

185

186:shifty:

[brotherdoobie]

The results of my IQ test:

B"0"B

Explain?

Peace bd

[Dark Steno]

124 :p

[twisterX]

how the hell and i gonna know. :P

[S!X]

Im too stupid and weaksauce to have an "IQ".

[McStabhappy]

87 thats from a real test

[JPaul]

Well I'm sure you can use both words in that sentence

Peace S ;)
"either word" and indeed you can. However only one option would be correct. Rather bizarrely it wouldn't be "correct", which is quite sweet.

To use both would just be mentalist.

[Barbarossa]

"your IQ"

:huh:

[DarthInsinuate]

"your IQ"

:huh:
v. poor, see me

[sArA]

IQ tests only test the ability of an individual to do IQ tests. :snooty:

[Guillaume]

IQ tests only test the ability of an individual to do IQ tests. :snooty:
Let me guess. You scored under 100? :dry:

[Barbarossa]

Isn't it out of 100? :huh:

[Guillaume]

Isn't it out of 100? :huh:
:rod:

[Barbarossa]

:rod:

Bah! :P
Thought I might have got you 'cos it was so early in the morning...

[manker]

"either word" and indeed you can. However only one option would be correct. Rather bizarrely it wouldn't be "correct", which is quite sweet.

To use both would just be mentalist.My favourite post of the last week :wub:

[Gemby!]

i dont know my IQ, but im guessing genius :cool:

[JPaul]

My favourite post of the last week :wub:
Is the World about to end, why was I not informed.

[Blythorama]

IQ=12:cry:

Doorknobs confuse me.

[JPaul]

IQ=12:cry:

Doorknobs confuse me.
Don't talk to them well.

[manker]

Is the World about to end, why was I not informed.Just the civilised world, you're unlikely to be affected :schnauz:

[JPaul]

Just the civilised world, you're unlikely to be affected :schnauz:
Affected, Moi.

Mange Tout.

[j2k4]

Affected, Moi.

Mange Tout.

Penalty for affected Gaullism.

Recant, repent, then retest.

[Mr. Mulder]

i got like 50 million :unsure:

[Caroline]

i got like 50 million :unsure:
spermcells?

[Mr. Mulder]

spermcells?

they weren't on the test :huh:

[Caroline]

then i suppose they are merelly lice.
too bad.

[Gripper]

114 must have guessed a few right

[JPaul]

Penalty for affected Gaullism.

Recant, repent, then retest.
I agree with Sara, they only show that you can do IQ tests.

They are culturally biased and of questionable worth.

Read this


(1) An IQ of 50 or below. This is the threshold below which most adults cannot cope outside of an institution. They can typically be taught to read at a 3rd or 4th grade level. However, they cannot normally function in the customary classroom setting, and they require special training programs.
(2) An IQ between 50 and 75. At this level of intelligence, they generally cannot complete elementary school. Most adults will need smarter help in coping with the world.
(3) An IQ between 75 and 105. Children in this IQ range are not generally able to complete a college prep course in high school.
(4) An IQ between 105 and 115. May graduate from college but generally, not with grades that would qualify them for graduate school.
(5) An IQ above 115. No restrictions.

For IQs in these ranges, the influence of IQ upon socioeconomic status is dramatic. 31% of those with IQs below 75 were on welfare, compared with 8% of those in the 90 to 110 IQ interval, and 0% in those with IQs above 125. 55% of mothers with IQs below 75 went on welfare after the birth of the first child, compared with 12% of those with IQs between 90 and 110, and 1% of those with IQs above 125. Income is highly dependent upon IQ up to an IQ-level of about 125.

[j2k4]

I agree with Sara, they only show that you can do IQ tests.

They are culturally biased and of questionable worth.

I think I'll throw in with the two of you.

As a high-school senior, I tested at 184.

About four years later, after suffering a severe skull fracture and not knowing it (that's another story), I was tested at a Dr.'s request on a purely exploratory basis and scored 168.

It was a far different test, the product of one of the original "corrective" efforts aimed at helping minorities.

The doctor wanted, I believe, to see if there were lasting effects from my injury; he said the results were inconclusive-however I can definitely attest to a radical degradation in my ability to do high maths.

I count it a good day when can I do percentages in my head in aid of my wife's efforts to save money at the mall.:lol:

In essence, I am a mere mental shadow of my former self.

[Gripper]

Damn I'm fick

[Caroline]

but hapfy

[j2k4]

Damn I'm fick

Don't count on that.

A high IQ didn't prevent me breaking my fucking head doing something questionable with a big piece of steel.

Everything's relative.:huh:

[Gripper]

Yeah feckit who needs some prat telling me wever i'm clever or not

[JPaul]

I think I'll throw in with the two of you.

As a high-school senior, I tested at 184.

About four years later, after suffering a severe skull fracture and not knowing it (that's another story), I was tested at a Dr.'s request on a purely exploratory basis and scored 168.

I don't know which method they were using mate, but your 184 would make you one of the greatest genuises to walk God's green Earth.

Feck even your wee 168 would place you alongside the greats.

Now I'm not saying this is not the case, I'm just surprised we haven't heard more about you. Or have we :shifty:

[Caroline]

and the most powerful man on this planet is?

[JPaul]

and the most powerful man on this planet is?
Bill Gates.

[Caroline]

IQ is?

[JPaul]

IQ is?
Intelligence Quotient.

[Caroline]

Reason for power is?

[Gripper]

Stephen Hawkins<J2K4

[Guillaume]

Stephen Hawkins<J2K4
Is that sportwise?

[JPaul]

Reason for power is?
A badly formed and nebulous question.

[Proper Bo]

Is that sportwise?

Not if it's chess, on the computer, controlled by his voicebox computerything

[maebach]

I got 123, 122 and 142 on 3 different sites. :unsure:

[j2k4]

I don't know which method they were using mate, but your 184 would make you one of the greatest genuises to walk God's green Earth.

Feck even your wee 168 would place you alongside the greats.

Now I'm not saying this is not the case, I'm just surprised we haven't heard more about you. Or have we :shifty:

No, no, this was...actually, I don't remember the proper title of the test I took; at the time there were 3 or 4 of what were referred to as "standardized" tests, and the one used for scholastic purposes (one of two, I think, and the one I took) was not recognized as the most rigorous, by any means.

This test (I found out later from my father, who was a school-board president for many years) was favored by the teacher's associations as it reflected positively on their efforts.

There was a clinical version which was favored by the medical/scientific community for finding new "Einsteins", and yet another (formulated in the 80's, I think) used by groups like MENSA, which groups sought some unfathomable "purity" of measurement.

Just the same, I did extremely well on my SAT (1579) and ACT (31), and was offered a nice selection of scholarships, which I by-passed...see, I was intelligent, not smart.

I'd guess my 184 would translate into something on the order of a 150-160 score in current testing, which means (to me) I'm probably worth a solid 140 or so, provided I test while straight, sober and rested.

I can manage the first two pretty well, but the latter is a tester; I don't sleep awfully well these days.

[j2k4]

Is that sportwise?

I am overdue for my wheelchair by about 15 years, according to Dr. Thomas Mohr, orthopedic surgeon to the Green Bay Packers.

I don't think I'll need Steve's special 'putor to communicate, though.

Interesting fact learned today:

A recent study reveals women say an average of 7000 words per day, while men average 2000 or so.

Sounds about right to me.:lol:

[MediaSlayer]

128 but that was when i was young, fresh, and in school.

i assure you it's MUCH lower now, after years of dull shitty life and drug abuse.

[Spider_dude]

yeah i'm sure jk pwns dr.sh in a game of rounders

[Smith]

Where would I find out my IQ?

[Spider_dude]

the back of a stamp

[maebach]

Just the same, I did extremely well on my SAT (1579) and ACT (31),



Those scores are nearly impossible :O :O :huh: :unsure: :blink: . You should be part of MENSA, a man at my uncles work is.

[j2k4]

Those scores are nearly impossible :O :O :huh: :unsure: :blink: . You should be part of MENSA, a man at my uncles work is.

Nonetheless-

I got something wrong in the math section of the SAT, and absolutely aced the ACT.

I dabbled around the edges of MENSA, but ultimately decided it didn't interest me.

It seemed they were heavily into pointless mental exercises and self-congratulatory rhetoric.

Then I thumped my melon, and decided lots of other things didn't interest me, either.

And here I am.

I think I like this more than I would have liked that, anyway.

[JPaul]

the back of a stamp
That's a bit h4r5h, but it did make me :lol: irl.

[JPaul]

Those scores are nearly impossible :O :O :huh: :unsure: :blink: . You should be part of MENSA, a man at my uncles work is.
Ask him to explain the use of the apostrophe to you. Perhaps take notes.

Isn't "nearly impossible" qualifying a superlative btw.

[maebach]

Ask him to explain the use of the apostrophe to you. Perhaps take notes.

Isn't "nearly impossible" qualifying a superlative btw.

Do I need the apostrophe here?

'a man at my uncle's work. . .'

[crysmileyguy!]

my iq is 5 what do i win? :cry:

[JPaul]

I got 123, 122 and 142 on 3 different sites. :unsure:
You tell me.

[maebach]

It was a rhetorical question :dry:

[j2k4]

Do I need the apostrophe here?

'a man at my uncle's work. . .'

The over-large one you've employed is a quality insertion.

The little one ahead of the "a" to begin your quote is, um.......not.

[enoughfakefiles]

How do you make a post.:unsure:

[JPaul]

How do you make a post.:unsure:
I generally use a lathe.

[enoughfakefiles]

I generally use a lathe.


What soap do you use for that then.??

[JPaul]

What soap do you use for that then.??
We really need to get the drumroll smillie re-instated.

[j2k4]

We really need to get the drumroll smillie re-instated.

I'll say.:huh: