PDA

View Full Version : Homos!



Pages : [1] 2

brotherdoobie
11-05-2005, 11:41 PM
Are you a homophobe?

Peace bd

Mr. Mulder
11-05-2005, 11:42 PM
depends how dark it is :ermm:

crysmileyguy!
11-05-2005, 11:49 PM
replace that question with 'is brotherdoobie a idiot?' then its a yes :snooty:

callum
11-05-2005, 11:56 PM
replace that question with 'is brotherdoobie a idiot?' then its a yes :snooty:

An idiot, surely.
It's always a good idea to check your spelling when calling someone an idiot :P

Proper Bo
11-06-2005, 12:17 AM
i'm not scared of me home :huh:

brotherdoobie
11-06-2005, 12:58 AM
replace that question with 'is brotherdoobie a idiot?' then its a yes :snooty:

You are a homophobe! You never pay any attention to teh homos! :snooty:

Peace bd

crysmileyguy!
11-06-2005, 01:16 AM
You are a homophobe! You never pay any attention to teh homos! :snooty:

Peace bd

:unsure: i cant helps it! id rather pay my attention to hot girls than homosexuals. :naughty: i guess it leaves more homosexuals for u to pay ur valuable attention to :schnauz:

brenda
11-06-2005, 01:37 AM
Is there such a thing as heterophobia I wonder

Smith
11-06-2005, 03:21 AM
Is there such a thing as heterophobia I wonder


Ask Bd....

brotherdoobie
11-06-2005, 08:03 AM
I'm fond of homos. Their fine by me.

Peace bd

brotherdoobie
11-06-2005, 08:09 AM
replace that question with 'is brotherdoobie a idiot?' then its a yes :snooty:

Do you know the whole story lad? I am for the homos.

Peace bd

Santa
11-06-2005, 10:51 AM
i think this could cause Hetrophobia

http://www.personalpowertraining.net/desireedumpel.comuniverse2003.jpg


.

Yogi
11-06-2005, 11:33 AM
I am phobic for homephobics.

Gripper
11-06-2005, 01:34 PM
No,that would be ghey(as Gepper and Ziggy would say)

Busyman
11-06-2005, 04:48 PM
depends how dark it is :ermm:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

brotherdoobie
11-06-2005, 08:28 PM
I am really fond of homos. I find them interesting. ;)

Peace bd

JPaul
11-06-2005, 08:35 PM
Are you referring to Homo floresiensis.

brotherdoobie
11-06-2005, 08:40 PM
Are you referring to Homo floresiensis.

No, but "hobbits" also rawk!

Peace bd

JPaul
11-06-2005, 08:46 PM
The which of the various Homo groups do you refer to.

Gripper
11-06-2005, 08:56 PM
Homo superior....X Men rawk

brotherdoobie
11-07-2005, 12:57 PM
The which of the various Homo groups do you refer to.
The group that most of you seem not to notice.

Peace bd :O

sArA
11-07-2005, 02:32 PM
I like homo's especially if they let me watch.

Busyman
11-07-2005, 03:01 PM
I like homo's especially if they let me watch.
Women or men?:happy:

sArA
11-07-2005, 11:57 PM
I like homo's especially if they let me watch.
Women or men?:happy:


Men :naughty:

brotherdoobie
11-08-2005, 12:56 PM
Have you met my friend?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v173/brotherdoobie/eye.gif

He enjoys homos...

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105423



http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?p=1164224#post1164224


http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105513

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?p=1166579#post1166579





Homographs and the occasional homonyms.

Peace bd

Busyman
11-08-2005, 03:24 PM
Women or men?:happy:


Men :naughty:
One time when I with my ex, we were in a porn video store and she went to the gay men section and wanted to get a homo tape. I asked her wtf do you want to watch that for? FUCK NO!! She said she it was something different.:angry:

I made her put it back then proceeded to get male-on-female/female-on-female tapes.:lookaroun

So uhhh.....you don't like watchin' women on women action?:naughty:

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 03:26 PM
Men :naughty:
One time when I with my ex, we were in a porn video store and she went to the gay men section and wanted to get a homo tape. I asked her wtf do you want to watch that for? FUCK NO!! She said she it was something different.:angry:

I made her put it back then proceeded to get male-on-female/female-on-female tapes.:lookaroun

Worried you may have twitched a bit at the man-on-man action? :lol:

Busyman
11-08-2005, 03:31 PM
One time when I with my ex, we were in a porn video store and she went to the gay men section and wanted to get a homo tape. I asked her wtf do you want to watch that for? FUCK NO!! She said she it was something different.:angry:

I made her put it back then proceeded to get male-on-female/female-on-female tapes.:lookaroun

Worried you may have twitched a bit at the man-on-man action? :lol:
I've seen it before and it's disgusting to me.:angry: :sick:

Way back when Minority Report came out, I downloaded what I thought was Minority Report....it wasn't.:angry:

GepperRankins
11-08-2005, 03:32 PM
:rolf: at busyman

manker
11-08-2005, 03:33 PM
Way back when Minority Report came out, I downloaded what I thought was Minority Report....it wasn't.KaZaa rawks.

GepperRankins
11-08-2005, 03:33 PM
Men :naughty:
One time when I with my ex, we were in a porn video store and she went to the gay men section and wanted to get a homo tape. I asked her wtf do you want to watch that for? FUCK NO!! She said she it was something different.:angry:

I made her put it back then proceeded to get male-on-female/female-on-female tapes.:lookaroun

So uhhh.....you don't like watchin' women on women action?:naughty:
arse. if you expect her to watch what you want, at least return the favour :snooty:

Busyman
11-08-2005, 03:34 PM
Way back when Minority Report came out, I downloaded what I thought was Minority Report....it wasn't.KaZaa rawks.
:lol: :lol: :lol: Fake file bastards!!!:angry:

That fucking movie tainted my hard drive.

manker
11-08-2005, 03:41 PM
There is no way I'd be wanting to watch two blokes having sex. Even if it was the polite thing to do as I'd just watched some hawt lesbian action with a girl.

No way :no:

You don't give to receive (baaaaad choice of words) so just because she's done something nice for you doesn't necessarily mean that she'd want you to do the same. It also doesn't mean she'd expect you to reciprocate in exactly the same way - I'd just go down on her for twenty minutes longer or something, as a compromise, like.

Gripper
11-08-2005, 03:48 PM
manker you are such a cunning linguist.

manker
11-08-2005, 03:53 PM
And you, Grippy, are a smooth talking bar-steward :naughty:

Busyman
11-08-2005, 03:54 PM
There is no way I'd be wanting to watch two blokes having sex. Even if it was the polite thing to do as I'd just watched some hawt lesbian action with a girl.

No way :no:

You don't give to receive (baaaaad choice of words) so just because she's done something nice for you doesn't necessarily mean that she'd want you to do the same. It also doesn't mean she'd expect you to reciprocate in exactly the same way - I'd just go down on her for twenty minutes longer or something, as a compromise, like.
A friend of mine had a porno and the setting was baseball. The movie was going just fine...this black and this white were about to bang this white chick in the locker room...she's grabbing their johnsons at then says, "Oh no. Before you do me, you've got to do each other." WTF!! I cut the motherfucker off.damn black fella was about to get behind the other fella.

I told my friend that his fucking tape had gay porn in it. He took it and gave it back and said it's fine now. I watched it and when it got to that part it when to white snow for about 10 minutes.:lol: :lol: :lol:

Why'd they fuck up a regular porno with some gay stuff in it? Mind you I was a young teenager and was recording movies on Betamax. Looong time ago.

Barbarossa
11-08-2005, 03:55 PM
It wasn't snow :sick:

manker
11-08-2005, 03:56 PM
I duno, maybe some folk like that - I imagine some women would get off on it ... maybe.

It's never gonna be in the top 100 of all time porno movies with a gay scene in, that's fo' sho' :dabs:

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 04:43 PM
Man-on-man action is hot, precisely because it's more taboo than girl-on-girl. Us lasses rarely get to see you lot getting it on.

Why is this, seriously? Why is it a socially acceptable turn-on for both sexes to watch lass-on-lass but not man-on-man? Is it a threat to male sexuality to watch it? If so, why is it not a threat to ours to watch lesbo-action? Or are all women percieved as "being a little bit gay really"?

Just curious really.

Guillaume
11-08-2005, 04:53 PM
Dunno why.

As for gay pron, the "ouch-factor" turns me off, is all.

The same reason I don't watch or participate in heterosexual bumming or S & M stuff.

Busyman
11-08-2005, 04:57 PM
Man-on-man action is hot, precisely because it's more taboo than girl-on-girl. Us lasses rarely get to see you lot getting it on.

Why is this, seriously? Why is it a socially acceptable turn-on for both sexes to watch lass-on-lass but not man-on-man? Is it a threat to male sexuality to watch it? If so, why is it not a threat to ours to watch lesbo-action? Or are all women percieved as "being a little bit gay really"?

Just curious really.
It's quite easy....female are halfway gay already.

You complement on each others butt, help each other get dressed and hug each other all close like.

Further from that, it is socially acceptable 'cause women getting it on just look like sexy women. Men look like bitches.

I used to date a gay female and she was just as feminine as a straight woman. Sadly I couldn't get a threesome.:dry:

She also told me that gay women, even the butchiest ones, sometimes want dick.

Barbarossa
11-08-2005, 05:01 PM
Dunno why.

As for gay pron, the "ouch-factor" turns me off, is all.

The same reason I don't watch or participate in heterosexual bumming or S & M stuff.

http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/prodimages/biggie/009385.jpg

:naughty:

Guillaume
11-08-2005, 05:01 PM
It's quite easy....female are halfway gay already.

You complement on each others butt, help each other get dressed and hug each other all close like.

Further from that, it is socially acceptable 'cause women getting it on just look like sexy women. Men look like bitches.

I used to date a gay female and she was just as feminine as a straight woman. Sadly I couldn't get a threesome.:dry:

She also told me that gay women, even the butchiest ones, sometimes want dick.
/me dons flame-proof suit.

manker
11-08-2005, 05:13 PM
Man-on-man action is hot, precisely because it's more taboo than girl-on-girl. Us lasses rarely get to see you lot getting it on.

Why is this, seriously? Why is it a socially acceptable turn-on for both sexes to watch lass-on-lass but not man-on-man? Is it a threat to male sexuality to watch it? If so, why is it not a threat to ours to watch lesbo-action? Or are all women percieved as "being a little bit gay really"?

Just curious really.I really don't know about socially acceptable. I'm only talking from my perspective and what I'd like and what I wouldn't like.

I definitely don't like the thought of having anything up my arse and don't want to watch another bloke getting anything up his. Conversely, most ladies love getting munched on so don't mind seeing a lesbian sixty-nine.

Maybe that's it :unsure:

Proper Bo
11-08-2005, 06:12 PM
Man-on-man action is hot, precisely because it's more taboo than girl-on-girl. Us lasses rarely get to see you lot getting it on.

Why is this, seriously? Why is it a socially acceptable turn-on for both sexes to watch lass-on-lass but not man-on-man? Is it a threat to male sexuality to watch it? If so, why is it not a threat to ours to watch lesbo-action? Or are all women percieved as "being a little bit gay really"?

Just curious really.I really don't know about socially acceptable. I'm only talking from my perspective and what I'd like and what I wouldn't like.

I definitely don't like the thought of having anything up my arse and don't want to watch another bloke getting anything up his. Conversely, most ladies love getting munched on so don't mind seeing a lesbian sixty-nine.

Maybe that's it :unsure:

But by your logic, you wouldn't mind seeing a bloke giving another a blowjob for you enjoy them yourself?

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 06:22 PM
I really don't know about socially acceptable. I'm only talking from my perspective and what I'd like and what I wouldn't like.

I definitely don't like the thought of having anything up my arse and don't want to watch another bloke getting anything up his. Conversely, most ladies love getting munched on so don't mind seeing a lesbian sixty-nine.

Maybe that's it :unsure:

But by your logic, you wouldn't mind seeing a bloke giving another a blowjob for you enjoy them yourself?

Exactly. From your comments it has something to do with penetration I feel. Heterosexual men don't get penetrated or "taken" and percieve the act of being "taken" to be an act of weakness maybe? I dunno. Just seems like double standards.

I think the concept of most women being half way gay, busy, is a male fantasy rather than a female reality. There is nothing sexual about hugging another woman, we are more comfortable with physical expression than men. We don't think, "oh, can't hug Vanessa for too long, she'll think I'm gay", whereas there is always an element of that when men express their emotion physically. Unless sports are involved.

FYI, Many gay men don't practice buggery.

enoughfakefiles
11-08-2005, 06:24 PM
But by your logic, you wouldn't mind seeing a bloke giving another a blowjob for you enjoy them yourself?

Exactly. From your comments it has something to do with penetration I feel. Heterosexual men don't get penetrated or "taken" and percieve the act of being "taken" to be an act of weakness maybe? I dunno. Just seems like double standards.

I think the concept of most women being half way gay, busy, is a male fantasy rather than a female reality. There is nothing sexual about hugging another woman, we are more comfortable with physical expression than men. We don't think, "oh, can't hug Vanessa for too long, she'll think I'm gay", whereas there is always an element of that when men express their emotion physically. Unless sports are involved.

FYI, Many gay men don't practice buggery.

Who's vanessa.

Guillaume
11-08-2005, 06:26 PM
From your comments it has something to do with penetration I feel. Heterosexual men don't get penetrated or "taken" and percieve the act of being "taken" to be an act of weakness maybe? I dunno. Just seems like double standards.
Not really a sign of weakness. I've had things stuck up my arse and that's an experience I don't care to repeat. Now, if others want it, good for them.

Proper Bo
11-08-2005, 06:27 PM
Exactly. From your comments it has something to do with penetration I feel. Heterosexual men don't get penetrated or "taken" and percieve the act of being "taken" to be an act of weakness maybe? I dunno. Just seems like double standards.

I think the concept of most women being half way gay, busy, is a male fantasy rather than a female reality. There is nothing sexual about hugging another woman, we are more comfortable with physical expression than men. We don't think, "oh, can't hug Vanessa for too long, she'll think I'm gay", whereas there is always an element of that when men express their emotion physically. Unless sports are involved.

FYI, Many gay men don't practice buggery.
Who's vanessa.


:naughty:

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 06:37 PM
From your comments it has something to do with penetration I feel. Heterosexual men don't get penetrated or "taken" and percieve the act of being "taken" to be an act of weakness maybe? I dunno. Just seems like double standards.
Not really a sign of weakness. I've had things stuck up my arse and that's an experience I don't care to repeat. Now, if others want it, good for them.

I'm not talking about pessaries! Sex is different.
Anal sex is about power and control, not about getting off on fucking someones guts. The person who is having it done to them is completely submissive to the buggerer. Many men are not comfortable being submissive, especially not to other men, you are by nature, competitive creatures.

Watching non-violent consenting sex acts in porn is a turn on. Most women are comfortable enough to agree that they find women on women action arousing whether or not they want to practice it in real life themselves . Is anyone comfortable with themselves enough to admit they find men with men arousing? I'm not talking about buggery necessarily, which I admit is not a turn on simply as it looks violent to me, but what about blowjobs/handjobs/guys kissing?

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 06:41 PM
Man-on-man action is hot, precisely because it's more taboo than girl-on-girl. Us lasses rarely get to see you lot getting it on.

Why is this, seriously? Why is it a socially acceptable turn-on for both sexes to watch lass-on-lass but not man-on-man? Is it a threat to male sexuality to watch it? If so, why is it not a threat to ours to watch lesbo-action? Or are all women percieved as "being a little bit gay really"?

Just curious really.
It's quite easy....female are halfway gay already.

You complement on each others butt, help each other get dressed and hug each other all close like.

Further from that, it is socially acceptable 'cause women getting it on just look like sexy women. Men look like bitches.

I used to date a gay female and she was just as feminine as a straight woman. Sadly I couldn't get a threesome.:dry:

She also told me that gay women, even the butchiest ones, sometimes want dick.


How the fuck did you date a gay woman? Are you a lass?

Or do you mean she was bi?

manker
11-08-2005, 06:54 PM
I really don't know about socially acceptable. I'm only talking from my perspective and what I'd like and what I wouldn't like.

I definitely don't like the thought of having anything up my arse and don't want to watch another bloke getting anything up his. Conversely, most ladies love getting munched on so don't mind seeing a lesbian sixty-nine.

Maybe that's it :unsure:

But by your logic, you wouldn't mind seeing a bloke giving another a blowjob for you enjoy them yourself?There was no logic in that post and nor did I allude to there being some.

I've no idea why I don't want to watch gay porn, I just don't :unsure:

Proper Bo
11-08-2005, 06:57 PM
The reason I don't is cause I'm not attracted to men, quite simple really.

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 06:57 PM
But by your logic, you wouldn't mind seeing a bloke giving another a blowjob for you enjoy them yourself?There was no logic in that post and nor did I allude to there being some.

I've no idea why I don't want to watch gay porn, I just don't :unsure:


I was only asking because I was curious about why girl-on-girl was so interesting and man-action wasn't.

I suppose the long and short of it is that you get to see two/four of everything.

enoughfakefiles
11-08-2005, 06:58 PM
[QUOTE=Proper Bo]I've no idea why I don't want to watch gay porn, I just don't :unsure:

Not even gay women.:unsure:

manker
11-08-2005, 07:00 PM
But by your logic, you wouldn't mind seeing a bloke giving another a blowjob for you enjoy them yourself?

Exactly. From your comments it has something to do with penetration I feel. Heterosexual men don't get penetrated or "taken" and percieve the act of being "taken" to be an act of weakness maybe? I dunno. Just seems like double standards. Well, I don't get anything out of watching a bloke get a BJ off a girl either. Some guys do ... I don't know how to explain that either and would venture to guess that it cannot be encapsulated by anyone.

Since what stimulates us varies from person to person.

If you're insinuating that getting taken is thought of by heterosexual men as a weakness and therefore not erotic, then wouldn't the converse - seeing a woman get bukkaked - be the ultimate turn on, since it embodies dominance.

Because it isn't :dabs:

Proper Bo
11-08-2005, 07:04 PM
[quote=manker]

Not even gay women.:unsure:

manker said that, not me:blink:

manker
11-08-2005, 07:04 PM
There was no logic in that post and nor did I allude to there being some.

I've no idea why I don't want to watch gay porn, I just don't :unsure:


I was only asking because I was curious about why girl-on-girl was so interesting and man-action wasn't.

I suppose the long and short of it is that you get to see two/four of everything.Indeed :01:

But that was obvious from a bloke's point of view - you were initially enquiring as to why women seemed more receptive to lesbian porn than men seeing two blokes getting sweaty.

I still have no idea of the answer :D

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 07:05 PM
Exactly. From your comments it has something to do with penetration I feel. Heterosexual men don't get penetrated or "taken" and percieve the act of being "taken" to be an act of weakness maybe? I dunno. Just seems like double standards. Well, I don't get anything out of watching a bloke get a BJ off a girl either. Some guys do ... I don't know how to explain that either and would venture to guess that it cannot be encapsulated by anyone.

Since what stimulates us is varies from person to person.

If you're insinuating that getting taken is thought of by heterosexual men as a weakness and therefore not erotic, then wouldn't the converse - seeing a woman get bukkaked - be the ultimate turn on, since it embodies dominance.

Because it isn't :dabs:


No, I was merely speculating. I don't find anal sex remotely appealing. I have met some men however, that do find it the ultimate turn on when a woman is involved, precisely because of the dominance issue.

Whatever floats your boat I suppose.

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 07:08 PM
I was only asking because I was curious about why girl-on-girl was so interesting and man-action wasn't.

I suppose the long and short of it is that you get to see two/four of everything.Indeed :01:

But that was obvious from a bloke's point of view - you were initially enquiring as to why women seemed more receptive to lesbian porn than men seeing two blokes getting sweaty.

I still have no idea of the answer :D

Maybe its because its more socially acceptable? If I suggested to someone I was sleeping with that we get a male-on-male porn flick, he'd most likely respond in the same way as you chaps!

manker
11-08-2005, 07:16 PM
So nurture > nature in this case?

I tend to agree but wouldn't go so far as to use it as a general rule - a la Busyman :P

Busyman
11-08-2005, 07:17 PM
I was only asking because I was curious about why girl-on-girl was so interesting and man-action wasn't.

I suppose the long and short of it is that you get to see two/four of everything.Indeed :01:

But that was obvious from a bloke's point of view - you were initially enquiring as to why women seemed more receptive to lesbian porn than men seeing two blokes getting sweaty.

I still have no idea of the answer :D
That's quite easy.....

Women are held to a higher standard than men in society. Men are considered easily aroused and overtly sexual.

To a woman being sexual is sexy. To see 2 or more with each is even better.

Men on the other hand, with other men is punkish and bitchy. A man wanting to get done is disgusting and unmanly like....that's for women.

Women licking twat is not manly.

Guillaume
11-08-2005, 07:18 PM
So nurture > nature in this case?

I tend to agree but wouldn't go so far as to use it as a general rule - a la Busyman :Pà

There, I thought you might have use for it, manrod.

Busyman
11-08-2005, 07:21 PM
It's quite easy....female are halfway gay already.

You complement on each others butt, help each other get dressed and hug each other all close like.

Further from that, it is socially acceptable 'cause women getting it on just look like sexy women. Men look like bitches.

I used to date a gay female and she was just as feminine as a straight woman. Sadly I couldn't get a threesome.:dry:

She also told me that gay women, even the butchiest ones, sometimes want dick.

How the fuck did you date a gay woman? Are you a lass?

Or do you mean she was bi?
She had been only with women for 15 years. She considered men disgusting and disease carriers. I think long ago she considered women to be safer.

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 07:23 PM
So nurture > nature in this case?

I tend to agree but wouldn't go so far as to use it as a general rule - a la Busyman :P

Well, not really nurture. More like social acceptance of different forms of erotica. Male fantasies are catered for with a massive porn industry directed at them. It is only recently porn specially designed for women has been available.

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 07:24 PM
How the fuck did you date a gay woman? Are you a lass?

Or do you mean she was bi?
She had been only with women for 15 years. She considered men disgusting and disease carriers. I think long ago she considered women to be safer.

I still don't get it. Are you saying she "recovered" from her gayness to be with you?

Proper Bo
11-08-2005, 07:25 PM
She had been only with women for 15 years. She considered men disgusting and disease carriers. I think long ago she considered women to be safer.
I still don't get it. Are you saying she "recovered" from her gayness to be with you?

maybe his flabby bitch-tits confused her:unsure:

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 07:28 PM
I still don't get it. Are you saying she "recovered" from her gayness to be with you?

maybe his flabby bitch-tits confused her:unsure:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

manker
11-08-2005, 07:30 PM
I still don't get it. Are you saying she "recovered" from her gayness to be with you?

maybe his flabby bitch-tits confused her:unsure::glag:

Busyman
11-08-2005, 07:30 PM
Well, I don't get anything out of watching a bloke get a BJ off a girl either. Some guys do ... I don't know how to explain that either and would venture to guess that it cannot be encapsulated by anyone.

Since what stimulates us is varies from person to person.

If you're insinuating that getting taken is thought of by heterosexual men as a weakness and therefore not erotic, then wouldn't the converse - seeing a woman get bukkaked - be the ultimate turn on, since it embodies dominance.

Because it isn't :dabs:


No, I was merely speculating. I don't find anal sex remotely appealing. I have met some men however, that do find it the ultimate turn on when a woman is involved, precisely because of the dominance issue.

Whatever floats your boat I suppose.
Almost every time I did that, the female suggested it. Maybe it was just something different, who knows. It's not bad once a she relaxes but I prefer twat. :dabs:

I did notice some women get bolder with their sexual actions when drunk but I guess anyone does.

If I go to a bar alone, all I have to do is give it time and there'll be some lady getting bold with herself. Sometimes they look good (damn good) and sometimes I gotta tell them "I'm waiting for my girlfriend".

manker
11-08-2005, 07:30 PM
maybe his flabby bitch-tits confused her:unsure::glag:rly, I did glag, irl, like.

manker
11-08-2005, 07:33 PM
So nurture > nature in this case?

I tend to agree but wouldn't go so far as to use it as a general rule - a la Busyman :P

Well, not really nurture. More like social acceptance of different forms of erotica. Male fantasies are catered for with a massive porn industry directed at them. It is only recently porn specially designed for women has been available.
If it's not nature, by definition it must be nurture. That really is a black and white scenario.

Btw, did you notice how even tho' Busy is signed in anonymous, I pre-empted his posts with a succinct encapsulation :o

enoughfakefiles
11-08-2005, 07:33 PM
I still don't get it. Are you saying she "recovered" from her gayness to be with you?

maybe his flabby bitch-tits confused her:unsure:

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Busyman
11-08-2005, 07:35 PM
She had been only with women for 15 years. She considered men disgusting and disease carriers. I think long ago she considered women to be safer.

I still don't get it. Are you saying she "recovered" from her gayness to be with you?
Hell no. She still was attracted to women. No one can turn off that attraction.

She did say that she can't believe she used to eat pussy. I thought that was bullshit.

She did give shitty bj's...at first but got much much better.

Besides that though, she was a damn good woman. I wish it had worked out between me and her. She wanted to have a kid with me badly but I had to be married first.:(

manker
11-08-2005, 07:38 PM
Hell no. She still was attracted to women. No one can turn off that attraction.But you can turn it on, right?

So let me get this straight, people can decide to be gay but can't decide not to be gay.

At least so you said in a different thread :rolleyes:

Busyman
11-08-2005, 07:40 PM
Hell no. She still was attracted to women. No one can turn off that attraction.But you can turn it on, right?

So let me get this straight, people can decide to be gay but can't decide not to be gay.

At least so you said in a different thread :rolleyes:
Your lying. Post a link.

You can decide who you have sex with but not who is attractive.

manker
11-08-2005, 07:42 PM
But you can turn it on, right?

So let me get this straight, people can decide to be gay but can't decide not to be gay.

At least so you said in a different thread :rolleyes:
Your lying. Post a link.

You can decide who you have sex with but not who is attractive.I have a photographic memory :dry:

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 07:43 PM
Well, not really nurture. More like social acceptance of different forms of erotica. Male fantasies are catered for with a massive porn industry directed at them. It is only recently porn specially designed for women has been available.
If it's not nature, by definition it must be nurture. That really is a black and white scenario.

Btw, did you notice how even tho' Busy is signed in anonymous, I pre-empted his posts :o

Nature = Inherent in ourselves.
Nurture = Response to environmental stimuli.

I really don't know how our sexual responses are formed, whether they are learned or inherent. I'd like to say its a bit of both, but I really don't know. It's an interesting subject, how our preferences are formed and why we find something erotic or not. I do find the thought of two straight men together erotic, but I think it is more to do with the taboo, than anything else. But then again, I find the thought of another woman erotic too, but not because of the taboo.

I shall have to do some more research.

Busyman
11-08-2005, 07:44 PM
Your lying. Post a link.

You can decide who you have sex with but not who is attractive.I have a photographic memory :dry:
Nah. You've done stuff like that before.

It's probably more a problem with your reading comprehension than you being deceptive.

I apologize for my previous remarks.:)

manker
11-08-2005, 07:50 PM
If it's not nature, by definition it must be nurture. That really is a black and white scenario.

Btw, did you notice how even tho' Busy is signed in anonymous, I pre-empted his posts :o

Nature = Inherent in ourselves.
Nurture = Response to environmental stimuli.

I really don't know how our sexual responses are formed, whether they are learned or inherent. I'd like to say its a bit of both, but I really don't know. It's an interesting subject, how our preferences are formed and why we find something erotic or not. I do find the thought of two straight men together erotic, but I think it is more to do with the taboo, than anything else. But then again, I find the thought of another woman erotic too, but not because of the taboo.

I shall have to do some more research.Yes, a mix of both things which are, in themselves, mutually exclusive - and a mix which is different in everyone. That is exactly what I'm saying.

The taboo thing (two straight guys) is nurture and the not taboo thing (another woman) is nature ... however, because you, presumably, like the look of a knob then the former is partly to do with nature and because there is an inherent taboo involved with homosexual behaviour then the latter could be a little to do with nurture.

It's all very confusing and impossible to state something which will be correct for everyone.

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 07:51 PM
Hell no. She still was attracted to women. No one can turn off that attraction.But you can turn it on, right?

So let me get this straight, people can decide to be gay but can't decide not to be gay.

At least so you said in a different thread :rolleyes:

Personally, I think there are more degrees of sexuality than just gay or straight. I think there is a whole spectrum beween homo and heterosexual and a person may not necessarily stay at the same point all their life.

If you want to sleep with women as a woman, you label yourself gay because that is what society defines you as but I think it's more complex than that and one can be slightly gay, mostly gay, or full-on-gay. I've known gay people who have defined themselves gay in their teens, and then wanted to sleep with the opposite sex and really questioned their sexuality, even though they still mostly fancied the same sex.

Sexuality, like human nature, is fickle.

Busyman
11-08-2005, 07:55 PM
I think the nature part is the urge to achieve orgasm.

I think nurture is everything else.

manker
11-08-2005, 07:55 PM
I have a photographic memory :dry:
Nah. You've done stuff like that before.

It's probably more a problem with your reading comprehension than you being deceptive.

I apologize for my previous remarks.:)My reading comprehension borders on perfect. My memory isn't actually that hot, I was taking the piss with the photographic memory thing ... .

Anyhow, it is my, fairly, vivid recollection that you said that people can decide who and which sex they find attractive. I remember entirely disagreeing with this view.

It was a year ago and the thread was several pages long, so I can't say that I've definitively stated your view on the subject.

Busyman
11-08-2005, 07:58 PM
Nah. You've done stuff like that before.

It's probably more a problem with your reading comprehension than you being deceptive.

I apologize for my previous remarks.:)My reading comprehension borders on perfect. My memory isn't actually that hot, I was taking the piss with the photographic memory thing ... .

Anyhow, it is my, fairly, vivid recollection that you said that people can decide who and which sex they find attractive. I remember entirely disagreeing with this view.

It was a year ago and the thread was several pages long, so I can't say that I've definitively stated your view on the subject.
It wasn't me, bubba.

The only thing I've said definitively was that I don't believe people are born gay. Small minded people automatically decide that if one believes this way, that it must be choice.

I say it's neither.

manker
11-08-2005, 08:03 PM
So if they're not born gay, and they don't decide to be gay.

Wtf is it :blink:

manker
11-08-2005, 08:06 PM
Actually, fuck it. I will go back and read the thread if I feel the need.

I've about ten minutes before tea :dabs:

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 08:07 PM
Actually, fuck it. I will go back and read the thread if I feel the need.

I've about ten minutes before tea :dabs:

What are you having?

manker
11-08-2005, 08:14 PM
Actually, fuck it. I will go back and read the thread if I feel the need.

I've about ten minutes before tea :dabs:

What are you having?
Fish, peas, potatoes and parsley sauce.

Hawt stuff, eh :naughty:

enoughfakefiles
11-08-2005, 08:17 PM
What are you having?
Fish, peas, potatoes and parsley sauce.

Hawt stuff, eh :naughty:

Isn't that cod in butterparsley sauce.:unsure:

Why can't people be born gay.:unsure:

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 08:18 PM
What are you having?
Fish, peas, potatoes and parsley sauce.

Hawt stuff, eh :naughty:

Yum. :naughty:

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 08:19 PM
Fish, peas, potatoes and parsley sauce.

Hawt stuff, eh :naughty:

Isn't that cod in butterparsley sauce.:unsure:

Why can't people be born gay.:unsure:

I think they can, but whether they live that lifestyle or not may be learned?

Confusing stuff.

Gripper
11-08-2005, 08:19 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/gripper103/turkey_stuffing.jpg

manker
11-08-2005, 08:19 PM
Fish, peas, potatoes and parsley sauce.

Hawt stuff, eh :naughty:

Isn't that cod in butterparsley sauce.:unsure:

Why can't people be born gay.:unsure:No, the parsley sauce is made separate - not like in those packets you buy :P

And people can and are born gay - Busy is incorrect.

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 08:21 PM
Isn't that cod in butterparsley sauce.:unsure:

Why can't people be born gay.:unsure:No, the parsley sauce is made separate - not like in those packets you buy :P

And people can and are born gay - Busy is incorrect.

Phwoor. Is that like, fresh parsley?

manker
11-08-2005, 08:23 PM
Erm, maybe :unsure:

Fresh from Tescos anyhow ... I'm not the one making it but I'm sure it isn't that horrible boil in the bag stuff 'cos the last time we had parsley sauce, it tasted nice.

Busyman
11-08-2005, 08:24 PM
Isn't that cod in butterparsley sauce.:unsure:

Why can't people be born gay.:unsure:No, the parsley sauce is made separate - not like in those packets you buy :P

And people can and are born gay - Busy is incorrect.
It sure as hell hasn't been proven. :ermm:

I think in some cases, a boy's father could have been a former football player and all his brothers as well. He grows up liking football.

In other cases, the boy just won't like it.

People like what they like.

I've seen many like to bring up that people stay gay even under risk of persecution or death...well so do pedophiles.:dry: People simply call them sick and are done with it though.

enoughfakefiles
11-08-2005, 08:24 PM
Erm, maybe :unsure:

Fresh from Tescos anyhow ... I'm not the one making it but I'm sure it isn't that horrible boil in the bag stuff 'cos the last time we had that, it tasted nice.

Maybe your wifie hides the packets.:P

Blythorama
11-08-2005, 08:25 PM
Erm, maybe :unsure:

Fresh from Tescos anyhow ... I'm not the one making it but I'm sure it isn't that horrible boil in the bag stuff 'cos the last time we had that, it tasted nice.

Parlsey is nice. I like it.

Ta ra chucks. I have an evening of work ahead. :cry:

manker
11-08-2005, 08:26 PM
No, the parsley sauce is made separate - not like in those packets you buy :P

And people can and are born gay - Busy is incorrect.
It sure as hell hasn't been proven. :ermm:Quite.

Babies can't talk, so how could it.

One has to use logic and extrapolate.

manker
11-08-2005, 08:29 PM
Erm, maybe :unsure:

Fresh from Tescos anyhow ... I'm not the one making it but I'm sure it isn't that horrible boil in the bag stuff 'cos the last time we had that, it tasted nice.

Parlsey is nice. I like it.

Ta ra chucks. I have an evening of work ahead. :cry:Cya lata. Hope that goes alright.

I'm basically going to be lazing around ftw.

Gripper
11-08-2005, 08:31 PM
Did Oscar Wilde ever claim to be straight,I'd think he would have said he was born gay.

Busyman
11-08-2005, 08:44 PM
It sure as hell hasn't been proven. :ermm:Quite.

Babies can't talk, so how could it.

One has to use logic and extrapolate.
Yup and the logic saying gays are born isn't there.

I wish someone would explain my like for a nice all womanly phat ass....and why I don't like skinny females.

enoughfakefiles
11-08-2005, 08:48 PM
Quite.

Babies can't talk, so how could it.

One has to use logic and extrapolate.
Yup and the logic saying gays are born isn't there.

I wish someone would explain my like for a nice all womanly phat ass....and why I don't like skinny females.

Proberbly cause you like something to wrestle in bed.:P

Busyman
11-08-2005, 08:52 PM
Yup and the logic saying gays are born isn't there.

I wish someone would explain my like for a nice all womanly phat ass....and why I don't like skinny females.

Proberbly cause you like something to wrestle in bed.:P
http://www.abstracthiphop.com/hip-hop-honeys/darlene_crawford_pool_table.jpg

:naughty: :w00t: :w00t: :naughty:

JPaul
11-08-2005, 09:43 PM
Not only do I not find man on man action a turn on. I find it exactly the reverse. I have had the misfortune of seeing a few seconds of it and did not enjoy it one bit.

I have no problem with the male form and can see how it can be aesthetically pleasing. However any form of sex act, not my viewing choice.

Having said that, I find the image posted by busyman to be unattracive as well. Those are definitely manlegs.

Proper Bo
11-08-2005, 10:06 PM
fair point, well presented

Gripper
11-08-2005, 10:09 PM
jpaul is pro bo trying to be your nemesis

Proper Bo
11-08-2005, 10:13 PM
he just keeps copying my av and sig, the bar-steward.

brotherdoobie
11-08-2005, 11:21 PM
Have you met my friend?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v173/brotherdoobie/eye.gif

He enjoys homos...

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105423



http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showt...24#post1164224 (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?p=1164224#post1164224)


http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105513

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showt...79#post1166579 (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?p=1166579#post1166579)





Homographs and the occasional homonyms.

brotherdoobie
11-08-2005, 11:23 PM
Meh...

Peace bd

Busyman
11-09-2005, 01:14 AM
Not only do I not find man on man action a turn on. I find it exactly the reverse. I have had the misfortune of seeing a few seconds of it and did not enjoy it one bit.

I have no problem with the male form and can see how it can be aesthetically pleasing. However any form of sex act, not my viewing choice.

Having said that, I find the image posted by busyman to be unattracive as well. Those are definitely manlegs.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Women that wear high heels tend to them type of legs.....that and working out a wee bit.

You must take a look at some a doze female bodybuilders...those are manlegs.

The previous pic above is just in shape legs.

Proper Bo
11-09-2005, 01:16 AM
no, they're hideous rugby player legs

MagicNakor
11-09-2005, 01:25 AM
Well, I knew it was only a matter of time before this thread took a different turn. And more as a friendly reminder: Keep it civil folks. ;)

As for your liking "phat ass," Busyman, it's more biologically based. Large hips and thighs (amoung other things) on a woman indicate fertility. It's no modern revelation; the Venus of Willdendorf dates from around 30,000 BC.

http://docentes.uacj.mx/fgomez/museoglobal/photogallery/W/willdendorf%2030000%2025000%20ac.jpg

And the obligatory Rubens reference:

http://www.abcgallery.com/R/rubens/rubens60.jpg

:shuriken:

Busyman
11-09-2005, 01:26 AM
no, they're hideous rugby player legs
:lol: :lol: :lol:

http://www.abstracthiphop.com/hip-hop-honeys/darlene_crawford_red_boy_shorts.jpg

That was just that picture. You must like petite woman. Voluptuous ain't yo thang.

Proper Bo
11-09-2005, 01:32 AM
no there's nothing wrong with a round arse and nice sized pair of tits, but legs bigger than mine is just wrong!

brotherdoobie
11-09-2005, 01:35 AM
Have you met my friend?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v173/brotherdoobie/eye.gif

He enjoys homos...

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105423



http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showt...24#post1164224 (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?p=1164224#post1164224)


http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105513

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showt...79#post1166579 (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?p=1166579#post1166579)



Homographs and the occasional homonyms.

Barbarossa
11-09-2005, 11:25 AM
I apologize for my previous remarks.:)

All of them? :O

brotherdoobie
11-10-2005, 12:45 PM
Have you met my friend?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v173/brotherdoobie/eye.gif

He enjoys homos...

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105423



http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showt...24#post1164224 (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?p=1164224#post1164224)


http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105513

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showt...79#post1166579 (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?p=1166579#post1166579)



Homographs and the occasional homonyms.

Busyman
11-10-2005, 02:17 PM
Well, I knew it was only a matter of time before this thread took a different turn. And more as a friendly reminder: Keep it civil folks. ;)

As for your liking "phat ass," Busyman, it's more biologically based. Large hips and thighs (amoung other things) on a woman indicate fertility. It's no modern revelation; the Venus of Willdendorf dates from around 30,000 BC.

http://docentes.uacj.mx/fgomez/museoglobal/photogallery/W/willdendorf%2030000%2025000%20ac.jpg

And the obligatory Rubens reference:

http://www.abcgallery.com/R/rubens/rubens60.jpg

:shuriken:
:sick:

I understand what you say about fertility n' all dat. I don't like phat ass, curvy hips and dem fine ass tittays 'cause I want to have baby.

I know you going to say that's the underlying reason and all scholarly and whatnot but it just ain't.:ermm:

Busyman
11-10-2005, 02:19 PM
I apologize for my previous remarks.:)

All of them? :O
Of course not, Barbara.:dry:

It's that context of the post doohicky ya gotta pay attention to.

Busyman
11-10-2005, 02:33 PM
no there's nothing wrong with a round arse and nice sized pair of tits, but legs bigger than mine is just wrong!
I like women with imposing beauty.

Their womanhood has the look of magnificance.

It stirs me. It is mind-blowing and overwhelming.

If she's taller, weighs more, or has bigger legs, I don't mind as long as she has those nice womanly curves and isn't representative of Magic's picture.

I like making that body of hers feel good and have her come back for more.

I think the same of Natasha Henstridge and the lady from the L-Word that owned the cafe.

Imposing beauty yet they probably had pancake asses.

manker
11-10-2005, 02:41 PM
I think you just set your sights low 'cause you know you've no hope of attracting a normal looking woman.

Seems you've decided to go after the eight foot tall saggy-titted fatties that no-one else wants.

Busyman
11-10-2005, 02:57 PM
I think you just set your sights low 'cause you know you've no hope of attracting a normal looking woman.

Seems you've decided to go after the eight foot tall saggy-titted fatties that no-one else wants.
Wow that was fast. I wondered how long it would take for your shit to fly out of your mouth.

My shadow.:happy: (and awaits for his flunkies)

Going after...

http://www.abstracthiphop.com/hip-hop-honeys/darlene_crawford_red_boy_shorts.jpg

hardly fits your description.:lol: :lol: If it makes you feel better to say differently, please post another quip that has no bearing on reality. You're a holler.

How was the concert yesterday?

Barbarossa
11-10-2005, 03:02 PM
Has she got a cleft-palette? :blink:

manker
11-10-2005, 03:04 PM
Brilliant but everyone of my ribs are broken.

I wasn't trying to describe her - that pic you keep posting must be the hawtest of the weird ladies you like, therefore the ones you've bump into irl would better fit my description.

I think.

Guillaume
11-10-2005, 03:09 PM
My shadow.:happy: (and awaits for his flunkies)
If not wanting to have sex with a Tana Umaga look-alike makes me a flunkie, the so be it. :dry:

Busyman
11-10-2005, 03:16 PM
Brilliant but everyone every one of my ribs are broken.

I wasn't trying to describe her - that pic you keep posting must be the hawtest of the weird ladies you like, therefore the ones you've bump into irl would better fit my description.

I think.
Ahhh.

Nah, chicks similar to her are quite ubiquitous around these parts. Her ass in the pool table pic is quite noice and mesmerizing but I've had chicks like that before.

Busyman
11-10-2005, 03:18 PM
My shadow.:happy: (and awaits for his flunkies)
If not wanting to have sex with a Tana Umaga look-alike makes me a flunkie, the so be it. :dry:
No not at all. You like what you like.

If you consider yourself a flunkie so be it.

manker
11-10-2005, 03:21 PM
Brilliant but everyone every one of my ribs are broken.

I wasn't trying to describe her - that pic you keep posting must be the hawtest of the weird ladies you like, therefore the ones you've bump into irl would better fit my description.

I think.
Ahhh.

Nah, chicks similar to her are quite ubiquitous around these parts. Her ass in the pool table pic is quite noice and mesmerizing but I've had chicks like that before.:rolleyes:

enoughfakefiles
11-10-2005, 03:27 PM
Please stop posting them pictures.:sick:

Busyman
11-10-2005, 03:31 PM
Please stop posting them pictures.:sick:
What pictures?:huh:

http://www.abstracthiphop.com/hip-hop-honeys/esther_baxter_dripping_honey.jpg

JPaul
11-10-2005, 03:38 PM
The ones of the ugly burds with big arses.

Busyman
11-10-2005, 03:40 PM
The ones of the ugly burds with big arses.
I'll try ta pawst somore penkeke arses instud.

JPaul
11-10-2005, 03:47 PM
The ones of the ugly burds with big arses.
I'll try ta pawst somore penkeke arses instud.
Twenty to four.

manker
11-10-2005, 03:48 PM
:lol:

maebach
11-11-2005, 01:31 AM
Please stop posting them pictures.:sick:
What pictures?:huh:

http://www.abstracthiphop.com/hip-hop-honeys/esther_baxter_dripping_honey.jpg


hawt :)

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 01:35 AM
She certainly drools a lot!

Busyman
11-11-2005, 01:36 AM
She certainly drools a lot!
That's not drool.:mellow:

(low count)

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 01:37 AM
sweat?

Busyman
11-11-2005, 01:43 AM
sweat?
eh eh.

Barbarossa
11-11-2005, 11:33 AM
These birds definitely all have something wrong with their mouths... :dabs:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 01:31 PM
These birds definitely all have something wrong with their mouths... :dabs:
:blink:

manker
11-11-2005, 01:39 PM
These birds definitely all have something wrong with their mouths... :dabs:
:blink:Rod, idiot or doesn't really have a photographic memory :dry:

sArA
11-11-2005, 02:19 PM
Back on topic....Blyth had some good stuff to say imo.

If you want my opinion...not that you lot have a choice :lol:

I like to see man on man action, it turns me on a lot. Girl on girl is ok I guess but my favourite pron (very hard to get hold of) is mmf.........but that's just me.

manker
11-11-2005, 02:20 PM
Empornium is full of double entry vids.

I'm told :lookaroun

Busyman
11-11-2005, 02:21 PM
:blink:Rod, idiot or doesn't really have a photographic memory :dry:
Photographic memory.

It was spelled "burds".

sArA
11-11-2005, 02:23 PM
Empornium is full of double entry vids.

I'm told :lookaroun

Oh yeah...plenty of that stuff about, but not much where the guys are bi.....thats like rocking horse shit!

manker
11-11-2005, 02:26 PM
Empornium is full of double entry vids.

I'm told :lookaroun

Oh yeah...plenty of that stuff about, but not much where the guys are bi.....thats like rocking horse shit!Ohhhh :pinch:

Don't think I've ever seen any of that but Busy said the other day about a vid his mate lent to him that had two guys and a girl where the girl made the two blokes get it on before they could touch her.

Sounds nawt hawt :unsure:

sArA
11-11-2005, 02:27 PM
Oh yeah...plenty of that stuff about, but not much where the guys are bi.....thats like rocking horse shit!Ohhhh :pinch:

Don't think I've ever seen any of that but Busy said the other day about a vid his mate lent to him that had two guys and a girl where the girl made the two blokes get it on before they could touch her.

Sounds nawt hawt :unsure:


Hmmmm wonder what the title was........../me to ask busyman

Barbarossa
11-11-2005, 02:29 PM
Dunno, but it was a bargain :dabs:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 02:32 PM
Back on topic....Blyth had some good stuff to say imo.

If you want my opinion...not that you lot have a choice :lol:

I like to see man on man action, it turns me on a lot. Girl on girl is ok I guess but my favourite pron (very hard to get hold of) is mmf.........but that's just me.
Well around these parts women get turned on by what they want. Many straight women are turned off gay fellas. DC has many dl brothas and women are terrified that they'll be with a secretly gay fella.

sArA
11-11-2005, 02:41 PM
Back on topic....Blyth had some good stuff to say imo.

If you want my opinion...not that you lot have a choice :lol:

I like to see man on man action, it turns me on a lot. Girl on girl is ok I guess but my favourite pron (very hard to get hold of) is mmf.........but that's just me.
Well around these parts women get turned on by what they want. Many straight women are turned off gay fellas. DC has many dl brothas and women are terrified that they'll be with a secretly gay fella.


IMO they sound a bit uptight.

HeavyMetalParkingLot
11-11-2005, 02:46 PM
I like to see man on man action, it turns me on a lot. Girl on girl is ok I guess but my favourite pron (very hard to get hold of) is mmf.........but that's just me.

Umm, hmm, so what are you doing tonight? :lol:

mmf seems to be about half the videos in the adult video store.

manker
11-11-2005, 02:47 PM
I like to see man on man action, it turns me on a lot. Girl on girl is ok I guess but my favourite pron (very hard to get hold of) is mmf.........but that's just me.

Umm, hmm, so what are you doing tonight? :lol:

mmf seems to be about half the videos in the adult video store.I guess you didn't read further on down when Sara specified that she liked mmf where the blokes were bi.

Or maybe you did :dabs:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 02:47 PM
Well around these parts women get turned on by what they want. Many straight women are turned off gay fellas. DC has many dl brothas and women are terrified that they'll be with a secretly gay fella.


IMO they sound a bit uptight.
I think so sometimes but we hear tragic stories of females going with a guy then finding out he's gay. Throws me off too when I go up and ask a question of someone that looks like a straight up G and as soon as he opens his mouth, all the gaylispness comes out. It's fucking weird.

I've been with women that try to put their finger in my ass and I hate that shit. FUck NOO!!1!1. I didn't think about at first but now I think it was a test 'cause a women would want to do that to a fella kinkwise is beyond me.

Busyman
11-11-2005, 02:49 PM
Umm, hmm, so what are you doing tonight? :lol:

mmf seems to be about half the videos in the adult video store.I guess you didn't read further on down when Sara specified that she liked mmf where the blokes were bi.

Or maybe you did :dabs:
:lol: :lol:

sArA
11-11-2005, 02:52 PM
Apparently, anal stimulation is pleasurable for men if they relax, this is because the prostrate is only really accessible anally and I have heard it can produce very intense sexual pleasure.

So....you boys are missing out if you don't try it.

Barbarossa
11-11-2005, 02:55 PM
No, you're alright, it's an exit not an entrance :dabs:

This may be one of the few cases where I agree with busy... :blink:

(i'm quite happy with the pleasure derived from my cawk)

Busyman
11-11-2005, 02:57 PM
Apparently, anal stimulation is pleasurable for men if they relax, this is because the prostrate is only really accessible anally and I have heard it can produce very intense sexual pleasure.

So....you boys are missing out if you don't try it.
My mother's a nurse and she told me that stimulation of the prostate is how semen samples are collected sans the jerking off.

My orgasms are intense enough and I ain't looking forward to the proctologist when I'm near 40. :fear:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:01 PM
This may be one of the few cases where I agree with busy... :blink:
:O :blink: GTFOOH!!!:blink: :O

sArA
11-11-2005, 03:03 PM
Either you guys are all lying or repressed....:lol:

My motto is, if it feels good, do it and I don't care two hoots if someone named 'society' doesn't like it.

manker
11-11-2005, 03:04 PM
Is is more ghey to plan a shopping trip or have a female digit inserted up your arse?

I don't like the thought of it and don't let women do it to me. However, I have this one recollection of being seventeen or eighteen and getting a blowjob outside of a pub off this woman who was probably about thirty.

I was enjoying it when all of a sidden she stuck, what I presume was, her thumb up my arse. The resultant orgasm left me unable to move for about ten minutes. Yes, Sara is correct, it is that good.

I mean this sincerely when I say that I must have some repressed fucked upness within me not to have let another woman do it - 'cause it was fecking brilliant.

Barbarossa
11-11-2005, 03:10 PM
That wasn't her thumb, it was the cawk of some randomly passing homo. :sick:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:10 PM
Either you guys are all lying or repressed....:lol:

My motto is, if it feels good, do it and I don't care two hoots if someone named 'society' doesn't like it.
Hmm so that's why gay fellas like to get banged in the ass.

One female was giving me a bj and starting licking around my balls and then went further with her tongue but that was about it. That shit made me squirm, it was weird, and more of a turn-off.

Never had any foreignness in my ass though and I never will.

My orgasms are intense enough. :snooty:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:12 PM
That wasn't her thumb, it was the cawk of some randomly passing homo. :sick:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

SECOND TIME SOMEONE HAS ME LAUGHING TEARY EYED!!!! :lol: :lol:

YOU AND LINKINPARK ARE ON MY FUNNY LIST!!!:lol: :lol:

manker
11-11-2005, 03:13 PM
One female was giving me a bj and starting licking around my balls and then went further with her tongue but that was about it. That shit made me squirm, it was weird, Surely the shit would have made it worse for her than for you :huh:

manker
11-11-2005, 03:13 PM
That wasn't her thumb, it was the cawk of some randomly passing homo. :sick:You've made me gay forever now :fist:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:14 PM
One female was giving me a bj and starting licking around my balls and then went further with her tongue but that was about it. That shit made me squirm, it was weird, Surely the shit would have made it worse for her than for you :huh:
I know someone would pick that shit up.

Easter Eggs.

Barbarossa
11-11-2005, 03:14 PM
Either you guys are all lying or repressed....:lol:

My motto is, if it feels good, do it and I don't care two hoots if someone named 'society' doesn't like it.

It's been tried, and I didn't like it. Everybody is different. :mellow:

manker
11-11-2005, 03:16 PM
Surely the shit would have made it worse for her than for you :huh:
I know someone would pick that shit up.

Easter Eggs.
We call them clinkers (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=clinkers) :dabs:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:16 PM
Is is more ghey to plan a shopping trip or have a female digit inserted up your arse?

I don't like the thought of it and don't let women do it to me. However, I have this one recollection of being seventeen or eighteen and getting a blowjob outside of a pub off this woman who was probably about thirty.

I was enjoying it when all of a sidden she stuck, what I presume was, her thumb up my arse. The resultant orgasm left me unable to move for about ten minutes. Yes, Sara is correct, it is that good.

I mean this sincerely when I say that I must have some repressed fucked upness within me not to have let another woman do it - 'cause it was fecking brilliant.
:schnauz: For prosperity........

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 03:16 PM
it's an out hole

Barbarossa
11-11-2005, 03:17 PM
YOU AND LINKINPARK ARE ON MY FUNNY LIST!!!:lol: :lol:

I seriously fucking hope this is a rod..

FFS, you are NOT seriously putting me on a par with LinkinPark???

I HAVE NEVER BEEN SO INSULTED :angry:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:20 PM
YOU AND LINKINPARK ARE ON MY FUNNY LIST!!!:lol: :lol:

I seriously fucking hope this is a rod..

FFS, you are NOT seriously putting me on a par with LinkinPark???

I HAVE NEVER BEEN SO INSULTED :angry:
I know. I know.

It's just that last night he had this thread (that was deleted) called FUCK! and I never laughed so hard on this forum.

ziggy and JP were funny as all get out too but Linkin took the cake.:lol:

manker
11-11-2005, 03:20 PM
Linkin Park is funny in a dog with two legs kindofa way.

manker
11-11-2005, 03:20 PM
I seriously fucking hope this is a rod..

FFS, you are NOT seriously putting me on a par with LinkinPark???

I HAVE NEVER BEEN SO INSULTED :angry:
I know. I know.

It's just that last night he had this thread (that was deleted) called FUCK! and I never laughed so hard on this forum.

ziggy and JP were funny as all get out too but Linkin took the cake.:lol:
Why was it deleted?

Fecking hate it when they do that.

Mods :dry:

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 03:21 PM
I seriously fucking hope this is a rod..

FFS, you are NOT seriously putting me on a par with LinkinPark???

I HAVE NEVER BEEN SO INSULTED :angry: I know. I know.

It's just that last night he had this thread (that was deleted) called FUCK! and I never laughed so hard on this forum.

ziggy and JP were funny as all get out too but Linkin took the cake.:lol:

I'm not REALLY JP ya know:rolleyes:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:21 PM
I know someone would pick that shit up.

Easter Eggs.
We call them clinkers (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=clinkers) :dabs:
:sick: :shutup: Ewwwww!!!:shutup: :sick:

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 03:22 PM
I know. I know.

It's just that last night he had this thread (that was deleted) called FUCK! and I never laughed so hard on this forum.

ziggy and JP were funny as all get out too but Linkin took the cake.:lol: Why was it deleted?

Fecking hate it when they do that.

Mods :dry:


I was fookin funny, if I do say so myself:01:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:22 PM
I know. I know.

It's just that last night he had this thread (that was deleted) called FUCK! and I never laughed so hard on this forum.

ziggy and JP were funny as all get out too but Linkin took the cake.:lol:

I'm not REALLY JP ya know:rolleyes:
Aww STFU Fugley.

manker
11-11-2005, 03:23 PM
I know. I know.

It's just that last night he had this thread (that was deleted) called FUCK! and I never laughed so hard on this forum.

ziggy and JP were funny as all get out too but Linkin took the cake.:lol:

I'm not REALLY JP ya know:rolleyes:
:lol: :lol:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:25 PM
Why was it deleted?

Fecking hate it when they do that.

Mods :dry:


I was fookin funny, if I do say so myself:01:
It is a shame that it was deleted (probably at the request of Linkin) 'cause I had a good game plan for him in that thread.

I think entire threads shouldn't be deleted once it gets to certain point. That thread got alot of posts in very short period of time.

Pure classic it was.

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 03:27 PM
yeah but it really made him look like a tit, so I'm guessing he realised and wanted it deleted.

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:28 PM
yeah but it really made him look like a tit, so I'm guessing he realised and wanted it deleted.
Had to be him.

Remember when he kept answering my questions?:lol: :lol:

I'M LAUGHING THINKING ABOUT IT!!!:lol: :lol:

Barbarossa
11-11-2005, 03:29 PM
and nobody saved this, did they? :(

manker
11-11-2005, 03:30 PM
yeah but it really made him look like a tit, so I'm guessing he realised and wanted it deleted.It should have just been closed rather than deleted.

Mods :dry:

manker
11-11-2005, 03:30 PM
yeah but it really made him look like a tit, so I'm guessing he realised and wanted it deleted.
Had to be him.

Remember when he kept answering my questions?:lol: :lol:

I'M LAUGHING THINKING ABOUT IT!!!:lol: :lol:So you were laughing at him rather than with him.

It all makes sense now :D

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:31 PM
and nobody saved this, did they? :(
I should have 'cause it was a rarity for me on this forum.

I actually enjoyed myself immensely loike.

Oh well the memory is there so fuck it. It's gone.:(

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 03:32 PM
in short, the fuck thread summed up;

Linkin ranting about wanting to shoot everyone at school
bustychap encouraging him and offerring advice on firearms
me being urban and telling him to bust a cap in dat ho's ass, yo

manker
11-11-2005, 03:32 PM
I might ask about it in the EATB section.

If I can be arsed. It's prolly still in the trash and I wouldn't mind reading it.

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:34 PM
Had to be him.

Remember when he kept answering my questions?:lol: :lol:

I'M LAUGHING THINKING ABOUT IT!!!:lol: :lol:So you were laughing at him rather than with him.

It all makes sense now :D
I said it in that thread...

It was like when I'm clownin one of my boys and he's all serious and what he says just kills you with laughter.

A good example is ..Next Friday when Mike Epps is upstairs in the bathroom after his car was just keyed.:lol: :lol:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:36 PM
I might ask about it in the EATB section.

If I can be arsed. It's prolly still in the trash and I wouldn't mind reading it.
It's probably better left trashed tbh.

I mean he asked for it to be trashed and the mods honored it. Plus there was the subject matter.....

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:39 PM
Where's that thread about that gay fella whining 'causing his boyfriend left him.

I know everyone looking at the post was :O :sick:

That was funny too but was at least a year and a half ago.

manker
11-11-2005, 03:39 PM
I might ask about it in the EATB section.

If I can be arsed. It's prolly still in the trash and I wouldn't mind reading it.
It's probably better left trashed tbh.

I mean he asked for it to be trashed and the mods honored it. Plus there was the subject matter.....Ah, didn't realise he was threatening to kill everyone in his school. What an idiot - it's a shame I missed it.

If he goes thro' with it (yeah, right), this forum could be used as evidence of premeditation. Quality.

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 03:40 PM
word

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 03:40 PM
i like how sara's secretly monitoring us, I see your name there, lurker!

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:40 PM
It's probably better left trashed tbh.

I mean he asked for it to be trashed and the mods honored it. Plus there was the subject matter.....Ah, didn't realise he was threatening to kill everyone in his school. What an idiot - it's a shame I missed it.

If he goes thro' with it (yeah, right), this forum could be used as evidence of premeditation. Quality.
No, no, no, mank. Not everyone, just a few select people.

manker
11-11-2005, 03:41 PM
i like how sara's secretly monitoring us, I see your name there, lurker!
Secretly :blink: :lol:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:41 PM
word
:huh:

Barbarossa
11-11-2005, 03:41 PM
and nobody saved this, did they? :(
I should have 'cause it was a rarity for me on this forum.

I actually enjoyed myself immensely loike.

Oh well the memory is there so fuck it. It's gone.:(

Can't you just recreate it for us then, as your memory is photographic? :dabs:

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 03:41 PM
i will

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:42 PM
i like how sara's secretly monitoring us, I see your name there, lurker!
Secretly :blink: :lol:
You beat me to it.

manker
11-11-2005, 03:42 PM
Ah, didn't realise he was threatening to kill everyone in his school. What an idiot - it's a shame I missed it.

If he goes thro' with it (yeah, right), this forum could be used as evidence of premeditation. Quality.
No, no, no, mank. Not everyone, just a few select people.Just going from what Bo said above.

Shame because I suppose if it's only a few people he shoots, it won't make front page news over there :dabs:

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 03:43 PM
linkin park: man wtf!! i hatez evry1 @ skool yo, iz gonna whack dem beeyatches
bustychap: indeed, may one reccomend this type of projectile releasing device?
me: word

manker
11-11-2005, 03:43 PM
I should have 'cause it was a rarity for me on this forum.

I actually enjoyed myself immensely loike.

Oh well the memory is there so fuck it. It's gone.:(

Can't you just recreate it for us then, as your memory is photographic? :dabs:I'm the only one on this forum with a photographic memory :dry:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:43 PM
I should have 'cause it was a rarity for me on this forum.

I actually enjoyed myself immensely loike.

Oh well the memory is there so fuck it. It's gone.:(

Can't you just recreate it for us then, as your memory is photographic? :dabs:
Deleted for a reason, roight?

I actually thought about posting some of it but it was....(the above reason)

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:44 PM
linkin park: man wtf!! i hatez evry1 @ skool yo, iz gonna whack dem beeyatches
bustychap: indeed, may one reccomend this type of projectile releasing device?
me: word
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Projectile Releasing Device?:lol: :lol: :lol:

Hey Bo just stay Proper or even Fugs but leave the JP persona behind from now on, mmk?

manker
11-11-2005, 03:46 PM
So we think Linkin Park is getting bullied (shocking, I know), therefore he is using this forum to vent his frustration about getting his arse kicked every single day.

Is that about right?

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:47 PM
So we think Linkin Park is getting bullied (shocking, I know), therefore he is using this forum to vent his frustration about getting his arse kicked every single day.

Is that about right?
No, totally wrong.

Where is Mr. Park anyway?

I hope he makes another good thread.

Barbarossa
11-11-2005, 03:48 PM
Can't you just recreate it for us then, as your memory is photographic? :dabs:I'm the only one on this forum with a photographic memory :dry:

Fair enough, Dafydd... :dabs:

manker
11-11-2005, 03:48 PM
So we think Linkin Park is getting bullied (shocking, I know), therefore he is using this forum to vent his frustration about getting his arse kicked every single day.

Is that about right?
No, totally wrong.I'm always right.

Busyman
11-11-2005, 03:50 PM
No, totally wrong.I'm always right.
That's coowol. You've got a photographic memory and clairvoyance.

You can remember all the shit you dreamt to a tee.

Excellent.:O

Now back on the topic of Homos!

So you say when you had that thumb up your ass..................

manker
11-11-2005, 03:54 PM
I'm always right.
That's coowol. You've got a photographic memory and clairvoyance.

You can remember all the shit you dreamt to a tee.

Excellent.:O

Now back on the topic of Homos!

So you say when you had that thumb up your ass..................Yup, I'm totally relaxed about it.

Kinda different to how I was feeling at the time, btw.

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 03:55 PM
it's an out hole, at least mine is anyway

manker
11-11-2005, 04:01 PM
I told that story in the pub a while ago, there were about fifteen or so of us there for a Man Utd Vs Arsenal game where we won 4-2.

Some people laughed, some were a bit freaked out by the thought of it ... but one of the lads who plays football for the same team as us saw it as a green light to tell us that he sometimes sticks his thumb up his arse while wanking.

See, there are limits to which personal experiences we should share with our peers.

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:02 PM
noice

manker
11-11-2005, 04:06 PM
Not for him. Not now anyway.

I think us taking the piss with 'thumbs up' gags every single weekend would have taken the gloss off :dabs:

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:07 PM
yes i have a friend with whom we have a similar gag, except it's a finger of fudge

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:08 PM
can you still buy those? i havent seem 'em for ages, used to be only 15p too

manker
11-11-2005, 04:10 PM
Haven't seen the ghey advert on telly for years, so I reckon no.

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:11 PM
I don't remember there being an advert

peat moss
11-11-2005, 04:13 PM
Not for him. Not now anyway.

I think us taking the piss with 'thumbs up' gags every single weekend would have taken the gloss off :dabs:


Depends on what hand he eats with I guess . :pinch: I must be tolerant
as my wife and I have two gay friends , only difference is they dress better than I do . :D

manker
11-11-2005, 04:14 PM
Not for him. Not now anyway.

I think us taking the piss with 'thumbs up' gags every single weekend would have taken the gloss off :dabs:


Depends on what hand he eats with I guess . :pinch: I must be tolerant
as my wife and I have two gay friends , only difference is they dress better than I do . :DActually there are more differences than that - unless you like a bit of hawt cawk action :P

Hi, Peat - where've you been recently, not seen you about, like.

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:14 PM
and they bum men


edit: mnker got in there first with an even gayer comment

manker
11-11-2005, 04:15 PM
Proper Slow.

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:16 PM
tis my pc:snooty:

manker
11-11-2005, 04:19 PM
tis my pc:snooty:Not to worry, if you put a fiver to it, once you sell that Mondeo - you'll be able to get a stick of 256meg ram with the proceeds :lookaroun

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:21 PM
i've got 256mb in now, hactually, i raided my brothers pc whilst he was asleep, he'll never know


although in retrospect, taking his monitor was pushing it

manker
11-11-2005, 04:22 PM
Just make sure he doesn't wake up?

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:23 PM
hmm, kill him, sounds like a good idea, I'll steal his chair then too, its comfy. Mine's stolen from an office

manker
11-11-2005, 04:25 PM
Get Linkin Park to do it on his homosexual homicidal spree ftw.

Also, you having a nicked chair doesn't surprise me, chav boy :snooty:

peat moss
11-11-2005, 04:27 PM
Depends on what hand he eats with I guess . :pinch: I must be tolerant
as my wife and I have two gay friends , only difference is they dress better than I do . :DActually there are more differences than that - unless you like a bit of hawt cawk action :P

Hi, Peat - where've you been recently, not seen you about, like.


Puter problems I'm trying to sort out ,had a lightning stike last week fried my mobo .

On the roomies right now she don't share well tho, nice thing is I'v starting reading again with my youngest son . :01:

manker
11-11-2005, 04:30 PM
Actually there are more differences than that - unless you like a bit of hawt cawk action :P

Hi, Peat - where've you been recently, not seen you about, like.


Puter problems I'm trying to sort out ,had a lightning stike last week fried my mobo .

On the roomies right now she don't share well tho, nice thing is I'v starting reading again with my youngest son . :01:I'm sure he'll get you up to speed in no time.

Glad to hear things are going well :01:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 04:36 PM
it's an out hole, at least mine is anyway
Same here.

I have jumped in a lady's ass before though. Not preferable over twat but not bad.

peat moss
11-11-2005, 04:37 PM
Puter problems I'm trying to sort out ,had a lightning stike last week fried my mobo .

On the roomies right now she don't share well tho, nice thing is I'v starting reading again with my youngest son . :01:I'm sure he'll get you up to speed in no time.

Glad to hear things are going well :01:


Yes he will ! :lol: Its funny try going with out a computer for a week I dare you NO double dare you , its tuff . :O But the sex life has improved tho, more time on my hands . :blushing:

manker
11-11-2005, 04:39 PM
it's an out hole, at least mine is anyway
Same here.

I have jumped in a lady's ass before though. Not preferable but not bad.I know you're a small guy and those women you post have massive arses ... but surely you jest :huh:

Barbarossa
11-11-2005, 04:42 PM
Stop shit-stirring now... :mellow:

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:42 PM
it's an out hole, at least mine is anyway Same here.

I have jumped in a lady's ass before though. Not preferable over twat but not bad.

I;ve never literally jumped in before...:unsure:

Busyman
11-11-2005, 04:44 PM
Same here.

I have jumped in a lady's ass before though. Not preferable but not bad.I know you're a small guy and those women you post have massive arses ... but surely you jest :huh:
Oh my bad...I jump in with my girthy dick, head first.

I am short but I ain't that short. I'm 5'9".
How tall are you anyway?

manker
11-11-2005, 04:48 PM
I know you're a small guy and those women you post have massive arses ... but surely you jest :huh:
Oh my bad...I jump in with my girthy dick, head first.

I am short but I ain't that short. I'm 5'9".
How tall are you anyway?Bo and I would tower over you.

But that doesn't make you a bad person, if we went out for a beer, I'd make sure that you weren't picked on. I'm not all bad ya know.

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:50 PM
Oh my bad...I jump in with my girthy dick, head first.

I am short but I ain't that short. I'm 5'9".
How tall are you anyway?Bo and I would tower over you.

But that doesn't make you a bad person, if we went out for a beer, I'd make sure that you weren't picked on. I'm not all bad ya know.


aslong as I can balance my pint on the shortarse's heed

busty, i'm about 6'1"/6'2"

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:51 PM
i imagine it'd be possible cause i bet busty's got a flat-top, ala carlton in the fresh prince, infact, I bet he's his double

Busyman
11-11-2005, 04:53 PM
Oh my bad...I jump in with my girthy dick, head first.

I am short but I ain't that short. I'm 5'9".
How tall are you anyway?Bo and I would tower over you.

But that doesn't make you a bad person, if we went out for a beer, I'd make sure that you weren't picked on. I'm not all bad ya know.
Well shit, if you stood over top of Bo, I bet you would tower over me.:ermm:

I wouldn't need the help though, thanks. I've kicked enough taller people's asses to inspire the confidence needed for me to kick future taller people's asses.

How tall are you again?

manker
11-11-2005, 04:53 PM
i imagine it'd be possible cause i bet busty's got a flat-top, ala carlton in the fresh prince, infact, I bet he's his double
:lol: :lol:

I'd stake my house on it.

Proper Bo
11-11-2005, 04:54 PM
awww, bless him, he's got shortman syndrome

manker
11-11-2005, 04:55 PM
Bo and I would tower over you.

But that doesn't make you a bad person, if we went out for a beer, I'd make sure that you weren't picked on. I'm not all bad ya know.
Well shit, if you stood over top of Bo, I bet you would tower over me.:ermm:

I wouldn't need the help though, thanks. I've kicked enough taller people's asses to inspire the confidence needed for me to kick future taller people's asses.

How tall are you again?
Again? I think not.

By the way. I could never have predicted that you'd reply that you're quite able to kick taller people's arses. I mean ... I am shocked.

:o :o :o :o :o :o

Busyman
11-11-2005, 04:55 PM
i imagine it'd be possible cause i bet busty's got a flat-top, ala carlton in the fresh prince, infact, I bet he's his double
I don't understand why people wear that haircut. It was outta style when the show was on. :ermm: Now anytime I see it, it's older fella wearing it.

It's called a Philly. I look more like Will Smith than Carlton though.

I wear an Even Steven with a Temp Taper fade in the back.

Barbarossa
11-11-2005, 04:56 PM
If you came round here, all 5'9" of you, we would call you stumpy.

Busyman
11-11-2005, 04:57 PM
Well shit, if you stood over top of Bo, I bet you would tower over me.:ermm:

I wouldn't need the help though, thanks. I've kicked enough taller people's asses to inspire the confidence needed for me to kick future taller people's asses.

How tall are you again?
Again? I think not.

By the way. I could never have predicted that you'd reply that you're quite able to kick taller people's arses. I mean ... I am shocked.

:o :o :o :o :o :o
Call me the shocker.:rolleyes:

Anyone is able to kick taller people's asses. Height does not = Fight.

manker
11-11-2005, 04:57 PM
awww, bless him, he's got shortman syndromeShortman syndrome with bitch titties.

Life be a bitch if you're Busy.