Dilemma?

[Gripper]

Your house is on fire,you can only save your kids or your wife,who do you choose???:O

[ziggyjuarez]

Can i sex the kids?If not i choose the wife.But if i cant sex the wife i choose the computer.If the computer has an anti-porn filter i choose death...

[Gripper]

Can i sex the kids?If not i choose the wife.But if i cant sex the wife i choose the computer.If the computer has an anti-porn filter i choose death...
You are a very sick lil puppy:lol: :lol: :lol:

[ziggyjuarez]

Would you not react the same way?Answer your own question.

[Busyman]

Your house is on fire,you can only save your kids or your wife,who do you choose???:O
Can you make harder questions?

The kids.

1. They haven't lived as long.
2. My wife would want me to save the kids.
3. By saving the "kids", I'm saving more lives than 1 wife.

Sorry but the wife is toast and I wouldn't even blink.

[Lilmiss]

i don't have a wife or kids.
hell, i may as well just burn the house for kicks. :unsure:

[JPaul]

Both, or die trying.

[manker]

Both, or die trying.
:cry:

Me too.

It really isn't a dilemma at all, when you see it put that way.

[Guillaume]

Neither.


Mmmm, insurance money.

[Proper Bo]

save the wife or kids?:huh:

I think you're forgetting about the vinyl collection:no:

[manker]

Actually, it's only Gripper and JP in this fred with both wife and kids, so far as I can see :dabs:

[Proper Bo]

music>wife/kids

:snooty:

[Busyman]

If I can only save the wife OR kids, I'm not going to commit suicide trying to save the wife.

Presented as an either/or scenario in a post is entirely different than in irl.:ermm:

Only 2 options were given. One cannot make a third.

It's like saying, if you could have a HD-DVD OR a Blu-Ray disc player, which would you have?

Answer, neither I'd stick with Video-CD. :dabs:

[manker]

If I can only save the wife OR kids, I'm not going to commit suicide trying to save the wife.That's fair enough.

I would tho'.

Not your wife, obviously, I hardly know the woman. I mean my missus.

[Busyman]

If I can only save the wife OR kids, I'm not going to commit suicide trying to save the wife.That's fair enough.

I would tho'.

Not your wife, obviously, I hardly know the woman. I mean my missus.
:D

"I saved the kids now the tower is falling so I run back into a falling tower.

I still have to get to the 13th floor."

Nope, not gonna happen.

Besides that, committing suicide to save the wife wasn't an option.

I have a better one.

If you could only pick-up your son OR your missus to carry them out, which would you carry out 1st?

[manker]

You should get your missus to sign up for this forum.

It would be great:



Oh no you didn't say you wouldn't rescue me...


.....deal with it, yo' ass is insured.

You take that back or you aint seeing this black ass fo' dust


....I got yo' ass insured for a cool half million.

You just did it again - no BJs for a week, basement boy.


.....Shit :(

[manker]

If you could only pick-up your son OR your missus to carry them out, which would you carry out 1st?You have to be a bit logical, I can carry them both so why would I have to leave one behind.

[Blythorama]

If you could only pick-up your son OR your missus to carry them out, which would you carry out 1st?You have to be a bit logical, I can carry them both so why would I have to leave one behind.




Yes but Busty's a fan of the larger buttocked ladies. I therefore surmise he would be unable to carry both for fear of further knee injury.

[Proper Bo]

I can't believe nobody pointed out the spelling mistake in the fred title:no:

[Busyman]

If you could only pick-up your son OR your missus to carry them out, which would you carry out 1st?You have to be a bit logical, I can carry them both so why would I have to leave one behind.
That fact you could in irl isn't an option.

You could have one arm in a slingwhateverthefuck.

Logic is picking from the options presented.

[Busyman]

I can't believe nobody pointed out the spelling mistake in the fred title:no:
For once, no one probably cared.:01:

[JPaul]

Only 2 options were given. One cannot make a third.


vidcc, stop using Busboy's account, there's no rule precluding someone adding a third option.

There probably will be soon tho'

[Busyman]

You should get your missus to sign up for this forum.

It would be great:



Oh no you didn't say you wouldn't rescue me...


.....deal with it, yo' ass is insured.

You take that back or you aint seeing this black ass fo' dust


....I got yo' ass insured for a cool half million.

You just did it again - no BJs for a week, basement boy.


.....Shit :(
:( Indeed.

She'd do the same.

If she could only save one of us, she'd save her daughter.

Even in hostage situations, children are higher in the pecking order.

This is not a stretch.

If some bloke had a gun to me and my little girl and she had to choose one of us to die (or else we all die), I'd expect she choose me.

Again, not a stretch.

[JPaul]

You have to be a bit logical, I can carry them both so why would I have to leave one behind.
That fact you could in irl isn't an option.

You could have one arm in a slingwhateverthefuck.

Logic is picking from the options presented.
Yeah, FFS mangit, try to think inside the box.

[manker]

You have to be a bit logical, I can carry them both so why would I have to leave one behind.
That fact you could in irl isn't an option.

You could have one arm in a slingwhateverthefuck.

Logic is picking from the options presented.That's just plain daft.

I could say to you, who is going to win the superbowl this year; Colts or the Dolphins.

It would not be logical to pick either team since neither are gonna win :huh:

[Busyman]

That fact you could in irl isn't an option.

You could have one arm in a slingwhateverthefuck.

Logic is picking from the options presented.That's just plain daft.

I could say to you, who is going to win the superbowl this year; Colts or the Dolphins.

It would not be logical to pick either team since neither are gonna win :huh:
One is based on concrete real life facts and one is not.

Not daft.

Almost like the penis vs. eyesight doohicky.

I could easily say neither but then I could have easily STFU too since it had shit to do with what was asked.

[Gripper]

I can't believe nobody pointed out the spelling mistake in the fred title:no:
di·lem·ma (d-lm)
n.

1. A situation that requires a choice between options that are or seem equally unfavorable or mutually exclusive.
2. Usage Problem. A problem that seems to defy a satisfactory solution.
3. Logic. An argument that presents two alternatives, each of which has the same consequence.

Maybe because there ain't one rodders:01:

[manker]

That's just plain daft.

I could say to you, who is going to win the superbowl this year; Colts or the Dolphins.

It would not be logical to pick either team since neither are gonna win :huh:
One is based on concrete real life facts and one is not.

Not daft.The Colts could make it to the final if Pittsburgh were found to have used steroids and cocaine in the quarter-final and semi-final and the Broncos did the same.

It could happen and, in fact, has more chance of happening than me being in a situation where I could only carry either one or t'other of my family to safety.

[Busyman]

One is based on concrete real life facts and one is not.

Not daft.The Colts could make it to the final if Pittsburgh were found to have used steroids and cocaine in the quarter-final and semi-final and the Broncos did the same.

It could happen and, in fact, has more chance of happening than me being in a situation where I could only carry either one or t'other of my family to safety.
The Lounge vs. The Drawing Room as to how topics turn out.

[manker]

Ya, you seem to get pwned a lot quicker in the lounge.

[Busyman]

Ya, you seem to get pwned a lot quicker in the lounge.
I wasn't pwned. Just bored to fuck.

It's the old If you had to lose your arms or your legs which would you lose and then someone says Neither.

And you go uhh no shit but that's not what I asked.

Good pwnage well done. :dabs:

[manker]

Yeah, it's the old, who is going to win the Superbowl; Colts or Dolphins and then someone goes neither and you say uhh no shit but that's not what I asked.

I was pointing out the utter stupidity of staying within confines of constraints set by hyperthetical questions when the options are too narrow.

See.

[Busyman]

Yeah, it's the old, who is going to win the Superbowl; Colts or Dolphins and then someone goes neither and you say uhh no shit but that's not what I asked.

I was pointing out the utter stupidity of staying within confines of constraints set by hyperthetical questions when the options are too narrow.

See.
No, mank.

It's quite simple.
The questions were posed to see what hard choice one would make...not to give an out by adding a convenient choice.

That's CaptainObvious.

One is a fuck around on a what if (penis/eyesight) one is based on history (Colts/Dolphins).

By always adding a convenient other choice it nullifies the question.

That's why I said "bored as fuck".

[Cheese]

As I already had to give up my penis for my eyesight yesterday then I'm afraid having a wife would be pretty pointless. Plus if I don't save my children then I have no way of growing more.

[Busyman]

As I already had to give up my penis for my eyesight yesterday then I'm afraid having a wife would be pretty pointless. Plus if I don't save my children then I have no way of growing more.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

All you had to do, instead of giving up your penis or eyesight, is give up your left thumb.

The option was unfairly not presented and it should've been to make it easier.

[manker]

Yeah, it's the old, who is going to win the Superbowl; Colts or Dolphins and then someone goes neither and you say uhh no shit but that's not what I asked.

I was pointing out the utter stupidity of staying within confines of constraints set by hyperthetical questions when the options are too narrow.

See.
No, mank.

It's quite simple.
The questions were posed to see what hard choice one would make...not to give an out by adding a convenient choice.

That's CaptainObvious.

One is a fuck around on a what if (penis/eyesight) one is based on history (Colts/Dolphins).

By always adding a convenient other choice it nullifies the question.

That's why I said "bored as fuck".
A non-sequitur. Didn't see that one coming.

A poor one at that. Why did you bring a penis and eyesight into it, your flawed hyperthetical situation was the kid/missus carrying thing.



Buh bye now :wave:

[Busyman]

No, mank.

It's quite simple.
The questions were posed to see what hard choice one would make...not to give an out by adding a convenient choice.

That's CaptainObvious.

One is a fuck around on a what if (penis/eyesight) one is based on history (Colts/Dolphins).

By always adding a convenient other choice it nullifies the question.

That's why I said "bored as fuck".
A non-sequitur. Didn't see that one coming.

A poor one at that. Why did you bring a penis and eyesight into it, your flawed hyperthetical situation was the kid/missus carrying thing.



Buh bye now :hi:
They are still interchangeable as they involved choices...one was kids vs wife. The other was penis vs. eyesight. :dabs:
Lets change it to kids or wife or kids and wife....oh too late.

Buh bye indeed.:happy:

[Cheese]

I might leave any ginger children behind however.

[Proper Bo]

I might leave any ginger children behind however.

they should be disposed of at birth and never hvae the canhce to get intosuch a situaiton:dabs:

[JPaul]

No, mank.

It's quite simple.
The questions were posed to see what hard choice one would make...not to give an out by adding a convenient choice.

That's CaptainObvious.

One is a fuck around on a what if (penis/eyesight) one is based on history (Colts/Dolphins).

By always adding a convenient other choice it nullifies the question.

That's why I said "bored as fuck".
A non-sequitur. Didn't see that one coming.

A poor one at that. Why did you bring a penis and eyesight into it, your flawed hyperthetical situation was the kid/missus carrying thing.



Buh bye now :wave:


Stop being a bully. You know perfectly well he doesn't really understand.

[Proper Bo]

glag

[manker]

A non-sequitur. Didn't see that one coming.

A poor one at that. Why did you bring a penis and eyesight into it, your flawed hyperthetical situation was the kid/missus carrying thing.



Buh bye now :wave:


Stop being a bully. You know perfectly well he doesn't really understand.My bastardized karmic belief will probably mean that he'll be on top form tomorrow.

If he can boost himself to the keyboard from within the depths of his invalid wanking pit, that is.

[JPaul]

Stop being a bully. You know perfectly well he doesn't really understand.

If he can boost himself to the keyboard from within the depths of his invalid wanking pit, that is.
What type of invalid does he supply this service for.

I know Blyth has a bad peg, would she qualify.

[manker]

If he can boost himself to the keyboard from within the depths of his invalid wanking pit, that is.
What type of invalid does he supply this service for.

I know Blyth has a bad peg, would she qualify.
:lol:

The service doesn't carry to anyone purporting to be female as Mme Busywank is paranoid about concealed weapons.

If one of his clients is packing, it has to be displayed proudly up front.

[Barbarossa]

I might leave any ginger children behind however.

Damn right, the ginger kid probably started the fire in the first place :angry:



Anyway, to answer the question, I would obviously save the baby first.

[sArA]

kids first. Besides, I would guess that my partner (unless incapacitated) could quite well save himself.

[Busyman]

kids first. Besides, I would guess that my partner (unless incapacitated) could quite well save himself.
Just save them both, silly.

[Blythorama]

If he can boost himself to the keyboard from within the depths of his invalid wanking pit, that is.
What type of invalid does he supply this service for.

I know Blyth has a bad peg, would she qualify.


Errrrrrrrr? :O

[manker]

Someone mentions 'invalids' and 'wanking' in the same sentence and for some inexplicable reason, your name is mentioned.

It's inexplicable.

[Blythorama]

Someone mentions 'invalids' and 'wanking' in the same sentence and for some inexplicable reason, your name is mentioned.

It's inexplicable.


Totally inexplicable! I'm truly shocked. :blink:

Are you ahead of yourself yet or still plugging away?

[manker]

Are we still talking onanism :unsure:








I got ten to do before I go home tonight. I'll be here til dawn.

[Snee]

Are we still talking onanism :unsure:








I got ten to do before I go home tonight. I'll be here til dawn.
You should have started earlier so as to start getting off sooner.

I mean, if you have to do it ten times and that :maebach:

[JPaul]

Are we still talking onanism :unsure:








I got ten to do before I go home tonight. I'll be here til dawn.
Ten what.

[Blythorama]

If you have ten onanistic events to yet occur, I hope you've brought the cold-creme for your soon-to-be-chaffed wee manny.

Seriously, as someone familiar with chasing evil deadlines, I do sympathise. At least I don't get fined if I don't make it though! Good luck and don't underestimate the power of strong coffee, sugary things, and a breath of freezing cold fresh air.

Right. I'm off to the pub in a bit. I'll down some cold refreshing lager just for you.

[Snee]

Gettings off, I would imagine.

[manker]

If you have ten onanistic events to yet occur, I hope you've brought the cold-creme for your soon-to-be-chaffed wee manny.

Seriously, as someone familiar with chasing evil deadlines, I do sympathise. At least I don't get fined if I don't make it though! Good luck and don't underestimate the power of strong coffee, sugary things, and a breath of freezing cold fresh air.

Right. I'm off to the pub in a bit. I'll down some cold refreshing lager just for you.Thanks, Blyth :(

[Blythorama]

Anytime deary... :shifty:

[NikkiD]

Your house is on fire,you can only save your kids or your wife,who do you choose???:O

The kid. I don't have a wife, and my significant other is probably the reason the house is on fire in the first place.