PDA

View Full Version : Send Back Liberty!



Barbarossa
04-28-2003, 01:53 PM
http://www.sendbackliberty.us/






amazing satire? ;)

j2k4
04-28-2003, 02:15 PM
Zis site is tres humorous, non? :D

clocker
04-28-2003, 04:46 PM
Ya know, I was with 'em all the way to the part about Ronald Reagan.
Then for some reason I couldn't stop gagging...

P.S.- I wonder if they would mind if I edited their site for grammar. Or maybe proper grammar is a French thing...

j2k4
04-28-2003, 04:58 PM
Originally posted by clocker@28 April 2003 - 11:46
Ya know, I was with 'em all the way to the part about Ronald Reagan.
Then for some reason I couldn't stop gagging...

P.S.- I wonder if they would mind if I edited their site for grammar. Or maybe proper grammar is a French thing...
Reagan was good for what ailed the U.S. at the time-A great counter-Carter, if you will.

The grammar could use some work.

As re: the French: Ze grammair iz pairfect!!!

clocker
04-28-2003, 05:03 PM
Why should we stop with the Statue of Liberty?

I say we send back that cesspool New Orleans, too!

hobbes
04-28-2003, 05:34 PM
My personal term of affection for the French is "Poodle smugglers".

As a young man of 16, I spent some time in Cannes. I wore the typical modest American swimwear to the beach. For the first couple days I couldn't get over the fact that the women were topless. After a while I acclimated and started to notice other things.

I can tolerate differences in modesty among cultures, but if your going to wear an itty bitty swimsuit, tidy up the yard a little.

It looked like these poor little swimsuits were just about to burst, stuffed to the brim with unbridled kinky pubic hair.

I determined that these people were involved in some sort of lucrative underworld poodle smuggling racket, transporting poodles up and down the beach in their swimsuits until they could make the drop and score some big cash.

billyfridge
04-28-2003, 06:23 PM
what's all this about grammar? can't you find something constructive to
say? I agree the americans should send the Statue Of Liberty back.
We Brits can send the Blackpool Tower, which is a smaller replica of tha
StatueOf Liberty, the French gave to us in the distant past (don't know
when), (don't know why).
Is my grammer ok, if not go eat a frogs leg billyfridge. :P

billyfridge
04-28-2003, 06:32 PM
sorry, billyfridge again, made a right cock up there didn't I, our Blackpool
Tower is a replica of the Eiffel Tower, not theStatue Of Liberty. oooops.

clocker
04-28-2003, 06:47 PM
Ooooo...





*edit for spelling & grammar

kAb
04-29-2003, 03:07 AM
good idea, we don't need it :P

one less terrorist target. by giving the statue back to the french, we're winning the war on terror! :P

j2k4
04-29-2003, 03:58 AM
Originally posted by clocker@28 April 2003 - 12:03
Why should we stop with the Statue of Liberty?

I say we send back that cesspool New Orleans, too!
Before it sinks and cannot be retrieved! :lol:

j2k4
04-29-2003, 04:00 AM
Originally posted by hobbes@28 April 2003 - 12:34
My personal term of affection for the French is "Poodle smugglers".

This goes in the file :lol: :lol:

Rat Faced
04-29-2003, 07:41 AM
We Brits can send the Blackpool Tower, which is a smaller replica of tha
StatueOf Liberty

You mean a replica of the Eiffel Tower surely.......Otherwise its a bit of an abstract rendition. :blink:

clocker
04-30-2003, 02:24 PM
Originally posted by Rat Faced@29 April 2003 - 01:41


You mean a replica of the Eiffel Tower surely.......Otherwise its a bit of an abstract rendition. :blink:
Goes along with his somewhat abstract logic, really.

leecheskicked
04-30-2003, 09:18 PM
thats the flag of orleon;s is'nt it?

leecheskicked
04-30-2003, 09:36 PM
and actually, back me up here rat faced, there would not be a USA today if it was not for french interference in a family squabble between england and english colonial settlers in the american colonies, truth is less than 5% bothered about indepedence.

chloe_cc2002
04-30-2003, 10:31 PM
and actually, back me up here rat faced, there would not be a USA today if it was not for french interference in a family squabble between england and english colonial settlers in the american colonies, truth is less than 5% bothered about indepedence

Don't they teach US history in the US?

Barbarossa
05-01-2003, 10:01 AM
Originally posted by chloe_cc2002@30 April 2003 - 22:31

and actually, back me up here rat faced, there would not be a USA today if it was not for french interference in a family squabble between england and english colonial settlers in the american colonies, truth is less than 5% bothered about indepedence

Don't they teach US history in the US?
Yes, but I think it goes something like this:

Chapter 1: And So God Created America, And Saw That It Was Good...... :unsure:

:rolleyes:

chloe_cc2002
05-01-2003, 10:30 AM
Chapter 1: And So God Created America, And Saw That It Was Good...... 

LOL

The French were interfering but were at with war with the British. The war of independence tied down a lot of resources to the British. At a very low cost the French caused the British a whole lot of trouble and that helped the war with the British.

Every ship that was in the Americas fighting against the Americans wasn't available to use against Nelson in Europe.

The British and French fleets were evenly matched in numbers. The British warships were spread very thin, and transports were especially important because from a strategic point of view the greater number of transports they had the larger the garrison the French had to put in each port city, because the size of their invasion force was limited by the number of transports they hard. For the British having those tied up in the Americas was quite an impediment.

If you remember the move Lloyds of London the British merchants were screaming out for escorts for their merchant ships and trying to maintain the blockade which was thinning and crumbling on them. The British won in the end, but the French helping the Americans a bit paid off massively really.

anyway........


http://www.imahosting.com/sigs/nutto.jpg

j2k4
05-01-2003, 02:41 PM
Originally posted by barbarossa@1 May 2003 - 05:01
Chapter 1: And So God Created America, And Saw That It Was Good...... :unsure:

:rolleyes:
Actually, the bent toward revisionism has left intact only those "facts" acknowledging human (read: neither male nor female; presumably at least some androgynous 'beings') involvement in the creation of America; God was legally estopped from reviewing/approving the result. He has been banished from books and public discourse, and is currently being hunted so as to be tried for 'war crimes'. :(

Rumor has it France is contracting with an American textbook publisher for the right to legally supplant Britain as America's progenitor.

clocker
05-01-2003, 06:39 PM
Originally posted by j2k4@1 May 2003 - 08:41
God was legally estopped from reviewing/approving the result. He has been banished from books and public discourse, and is currently being hunted so as to be tried for 'war crimes'. :(


See what happens when you piss God off?

He hath smote your avatar.

chloe_cc2002
05-01-2003, 08:42 PM
Now before anyone accuses me of being on drugs and/or alcohol or being otherwise impaired without the influence of any intoxicating substance, I know I am in the 'Statue of Liberty' forum.

However, I am very confused by the fact that it says last post 'Chloe' as when I inspect the said thread there are two others that have posted after I did.

Is this a strange and unusual phenomenon??

clocker
05-01-2003, 09:20 PM
Originally posted by chloe_cc2002@1 May 2003 - 14:42


Is this a strange and unusual phenomenon??
I told you God was pissed.

j2k4
05-02-2003, 08:49 AM
Originally posted by clocker+1 May 2003 - 13:39--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 1 May 2003 - 13:39)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--j2k4@1 May 2003 - 08:41
God was legally estopped from reviewing/approving the result. He has been banished from books and public discourse, and is currently being hunted so as to be tried for &#39;war crimes&#39;. :(


See what happens when you piss God off?

He hath smote your avatar. [/b][/quote]
Yes-

He keeps taking it away and giving it back; I don&#39;t know what I&#39;ve done (or undone).

Methinks, if this continues, I shall have to consult with [B][O][T], as he is well-acquainted with all things avatarian and is also presumably on good terms with God. :)

clocker
05-02-2003, 02:58 PM
J2...

"Eloquent pissing" is a talent I&#39;m not acquainted with.

Would you consider posting any tips on how best to develop this skill?

Perhaps a instructional video ( with appropriate pixellation, of course). :huh:

j2k4
05-02-2003, 04:38 PM
Originally posted by clocker@2 May 2003 - 09:58
J2...

"Eloquent pissing" is a talent I&#39;m not acquainted with.

Would you consider posting any tips on how best to develop this skill?

Perhaps a instructional video ( with appropriate pixellation, of course). :huh:
As for development of the skill, you, sir, already possess the ability, and I am glad to confirm this. ;)

If you covet MY style (to the extent I exhibit any), tough-you can&#39;t have it. B)

Any instructional videos forthcoming will be appropriately &#39;pissellated&#39; (remember: terminology is terrribly important).

All in all, there is admirable eloquence all over this forum for the discerning ear :D :D

clocker
05-02-2003, 06:52 PM
My,j2, but you have become enamored of emoticons...*



*note lack of expected smiley here

j2k4
05-02-2003, 11:21 PM
Originally posted by clocker@2 May 2003 - 13:52
My,j2, but you have become enamored of emoticons...*



*note lack of expected smiley here
My style(&#33;) continues it&#39;s metamorphosis&#33; (no emoticon)

clocker
05-03-2003, 12:21 AM
Originally posted by j2k4@2 May 2003 - 17:21

My style(&#33;) continues it&#39;s metamorphosis&#33; (no emoticon)
Somewhat like Jeff Goldblum in The Fly.

j2k4
05-03-2003, 02:14 AM
Originally posted by clocker+2 May 2003 - 19:21--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 2 May 2003 - 19:21)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--j2k4@2 May 2003 - 17:21

My style(&#33;) continues it&#39;s metamorphosis&#33;&nbsp; (no emoticon)
Somewhat like Jeff Goldblum in The Fly. [/b][/quote]
Yes, exactly (somewhat). :huh:

hobbes
05-03-2003, 02:35 AM
There are no fly politicians.

clocker
05-03-2003, 03:05 AM
Originally posted by hobbes@2 May 2003 - 20:35
There are no fly politicians.
You are correct again, hobbes.

Flies are by nature anarchists.
Which is a good thing.
Can you imagine the bloodsucking if they were Republicans?

hobbes
05-03-2003, 03:12 AM
Originally posted by clocker+3 May 2003 - 04:05--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 3 May 2003 - 04:05)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--hobbes@2 May 2003 - 20:35
There are no fly politicians.
You are correct again, hobbes.

Flies are by nature anarchists.
Which is a good thing.
Can you imagine the bloodsucking if they were Republicans?[/b][/quote]
Yeah, only the wealthy would get to suck blood, then declare this as a tax deduction.


Seriously, I hope you and you intelligent friends in Colorado can get some love from el presidente.

Yours,


Hobbes

j2k4
05-03-2003, 09:20 AM
Originally posted by hobbes+2 May 2003 - 22:12--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (hobbes @ 2 May 2003 - 22:12)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Originally posted by -clocker@3 May 2003 - 04:05
<!--QuoteBegin--hobbes@2 May 2003 - 20:35
There are no fly politicians.
You are correct again, hobbes.

Flies are by nature anarchists.
Which is a good thing.
Can you imagine the bloodsucking if they were Republicans?
Yeah, only the wealthy would get to suck blood, then declare this as a tax deduction.


Seriously, I hope you and you intelligent friends in Colorado can get some love from el presidente.

Yours,


Hobbes [/b][/quote]
"Fly" politicians?

My friends, I give you J.C. Watts&#33;

Seriously, I don&#39;t appreciate being termed a &#39;fly&#39;-now, leave me, so that I might enjoy this bit of leftover burger. :P

clocker
05-03-2003, 07:22 PM
Originally posted by j2k4@3 May 2003 - 03:20


Seriously, I don&#39;t appreciate being termed a &#39;fly&#39;-now, leave me, so that I might enjoy this bit of leftover burger. :P
Now who&#39;s Renfield?

j2k4
05-03-2003, 08:25 PM
Originally posted by clocker+3 May 2003 - 14:22--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 3 May 2003 - 14:22)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--j2k4@3 May 2003 - 03:20


Seriously, I don&#39;t appreciate being termed a &#39;fly&#39;-now, leave me, so that I might enjoy this bit of leftover burger. :P
Now who&#39;s Renfield? [/b][/quote]
Why me, of course&#33; :D