PDA

View Full Version : What do think of the new levels?



Cozmic_serpent
04-25-2007, 02:40 PM
Tracker levels that is: I think its a great improvement?

redMonster
04-25-2007, 03:05 PM
I think this discussion doesn't belong to this section.

Night0wl
04-25-2007, 03:12 PM
He just wants to feel special for being able to see it ,)

mikechrobot
04-25-2007, 04:06 PM
by special new levels do u mean ScN and RTS?

SnakesMan901
04-25-2007, 04:08 PM
bad levels ,,,
oink was rated 3/5 and now 4/10
3/5*2 =6/10 , maybe it's 5/10 Not 4/10
and bitmetv should be more than lvl 5 ...

Cozmic_serpent
04-25-2007, 04:13 PM
He just wants to feel special for being able to see it ,)

My mother aways sed I was special.

torrentt
04-25-2007, 04:16 PM
i don't think its necessary

SnipeR19
04-25-2007, 04:23 PM
Nice but i think that 5 levels better

mestari
04-25-2007, 05:00 PM
Imo it's excellent move. Old system went too tight with all those .5 ratings.
Now it's much more clear. Also some overrated trackers finally took their own place ;)

PlayMaker
04-25-2007, 05:17 PM
suckk

Night0wl
04-25-2007, 06:49 PM
bad levels ,,,
oink was rated 3/5 and now 4/10
3/5*2 =6/10 , maybe it's 5/10 Not 4/10
and bitmetv should be more than lvl 5 ...


Everyone knows that in content Oink beats all those trackers, so if you want to judge a site by what other people say about it then be my guest ;) Or actually it depends if you like your music or not. If you hate music, then it's 0/10. I like music so for me it's a perfect 10

I can't see it, so I can't really tell you what other trackers are misplaced, but I saw a copy of the old one and wasn't impressed.

bytetorrent
04-25-2007, 07:01 PM
nice move .. :yup: ..
so ftn is the new nadia comaneci 10/10 ! lol

IMHO it would have been better if those Level's were based on content ,speed and pretimes etc and the rarity rating inside the [#] tags !
for ex: Level 10 = ScT[9] (http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/p-what-invites-worth-post1600757/postcount11) !:shifty:

r4cc00n
04-25-2007, 08:25 PM
the levels and ratings of tracker invites and accounts are still pointless

Sentient
04-26-2007, 04:13 AM
POS you took my idea and now won't even let me see it!

mbucari1
04-26-2007, 04:18 AM
I actually don't care. I have what I want of the bittorrent trackers available (that I know of). I'm getting access to an 8TB dumpsite in a few days, so I probably won't be downloading via BT as much. I will be uploading however.

LorD.MeXiCaN
04-26-2007, 04:23 AM
is good

p3st
04-26-2007, 04:51 AM
i dont like the new sistem

vaidyanath
04-26-2007, 08:53 AM
new levels are better

RainRoofer
04-26-2007, 08:20 PM
I like new system, I suggested it long time ago.Great move!

akkk
04-26-2007, 08:27 PM
New system is kind of similar with the old, because the old had 2.5, 3.5 and now anything is exact numbers 1,2,3. But I think the new one is better :)

livelysory
04-26-2007, 09:48 PM
i don`t like the new system.
iplay is underrated

saulin
04-27-2007, 07:02 AM
It sucks

Oink and BitmeTV are totally underrated. The rarity bs needs to go and all trackers need to be rated according to content, pre times, speed.

AugustoP
04-27-2007, 07:30 AM
I think this whole rating system affects market too much. It is used like stock quote, but stock quotes actually reflect market, but this rating only affects it. Reasons for moving trackers up and down the rating are sometimes hard to understand.

dcliffnotes
04-27-2007, 12:23 PM
new ratings are good. easier to understand.

lineman
04-27-2007, 12:34 PM
It sucks

Oink and BitmeTV are totally underrated. The rarity bs needs to go and all trackers need to be rated according to content, pre times, speed.

So true. Oink is too underrated. :mellow:

garherd
04-27-2007, 01:46 PM
I think the old ratings system needed a little tweaking but now we've got overkill.

the-big-gamer
04-27-2007, 08:19 PM
thats not neccesary for me any tracker will be good