View Full Version : What level is RTS ??
HandsomePirate
05-21-2007, 02:12 PM
Can somebody tell me about that ??
fstrulz
05-21-2007, 02:16 PM
RTS, just like SCN, has no rating/level yet because it's still new.
Something Else
05-21-2007, 02:27 PM
Level 0
livelysory
05-21-2007, 02:28 PM
i hope they`ll be soon very up
sweed
05-21-2007, 02:46 PM
level 10 for the most ddos'ed site ... :/
mohamed01
05-21-2007, 04:42 PM
i think level 10 will be
Mugur
05-21-2007, 04:52 PM
Please someone tell me where can I find the ratings.
Cheffy
05-21-2007, 05:18 PM
Please someone tell me where can I find the ratings.
In the invite selection.
There a topic there called
What are invites worth
GaleaNatur
05-21-2007, 05:21 PM
i think level 10 will be
if it will be lvl10,SCN what lvl have to be?11??:D:D
SnipeR19
05-21-2007, 07:01 PM
i think level 10 will be
if it will be lvl10,SCN what lvl have to be?11??:D:D
8 Or 9 mate
DaMan05
05-21-2007, 07:06 PM
i say it will be level 7 for "hardness to get" only cuz the max users is 1000 and there already close to 900
5 on 10 for content cuz IT SUCKS ASS!!!! i've just parked my account and left if untill hopefully it picks up...
sweed
05-21-2007, 07:17 PM
i thought user limit was 2000 !
DaMan05
05-21-2007, 07:20 PM
nope. Registered Users841 Max Users1000
barral01
05-21-2007, 08:05 PM
Level 8 i think.
REVTTtorrent
05-21-2007, 08:07 PM
i think it will be lvl 7 maximum
fstrulz
05-21-2007, 08:08 PM
I think RTS will be lvl 6...
And SCN has the potential to be the next SCT, so I think it'll be lvl 8.
:rolleyes:
DaMan05
05-21-2007, 08:10 PM
And SCN has the potential to be the next SCT, so I think it'll be lvl 8.
true...
ps.. that av.... holy shyt thats a nice ass :w00t: lol...
GaleaNatur
05-21-2007, 08:29 PM
I think RTS will be lvl 6...
And SCN has the potential to be the next SCT, so I think it'll be lvl 8.
:rolleyes:
+1
saulin
05-21-2007, 09:37 PM
RTS is dead. level 1. SCN is looking much better. Level 2 for SCN
DV8type
05-21-2007, 10:03 PM
guys, the hype just isnt worth it. it is sad to see traders so desperate that they want to rank these so high. All of the top tier sites have been around for over a year, the content in them is stacked and the pres are great. TL, RevTT, TB, ST, TD (basically every other site that has been ranked) beats these two site. Even if its rarity, neither SCN nor RTS is rare.
-Im not saying they dont have the potential to be great trackers, but they are a bit to new to be ranked anything higher than a 3, and thats a bit high since they have not yet proven in anything.
WHRST
05-21-2007, 10:04 PM
RTS will probaly be high lvl, but only for rarity. SCN is good though.
JunelBT
05-21-2007, 10:38 PM
SCN is beating RTS right now as far as activity, but RTS has a lot of potential.
mamacita
05-22-2007, 04:58 AM
what's with all this hype about SCN? I didn't think the site was that special.
Wait and see if these sites blossom. Right now SCN has very little to offer
HandsomePirate
05-22-2007, 06:28 AM
RTS is dead. level 1. SCN is looking much better. Level 2 for SCN
seems like u wanna kick their a** !!!
Level 1 & 2 !!
saulin
05-22-2007, 07:00 AM
Yeah man level 1 or 2. I don't know where some people get level 5 or 6 haha. Not even Oink is rated 5. They are not that rare and their content is crap because they are so brand new. Well SCN might turn out alright but RTS barely has something and no seeders or leechers.
I think they should do what SCA did and open signups and do a lot of free leech till they get a good amount of members so they can get the ball rolling.
HandsomePirate
05-22-2007, 10:38 AM
Well....
this is reasonable.Many friends told me rts is not that one too.
Patriot foreve
05-22-2007, 03:10 PM
Both RTS,SCN aren't ranked yet because they are still new and it requires time to see what will develop and then rank them so i guess u just have to wait see their rankings or just drop that rankings thing ;)
the 'WIAW' thread is not always the best representation of how good a tracker is....TL is a great tracker, one of the best in my opinion and its only a level 2 or 3....just because their not hard to get doesn't mean that a site isn't good
jaqozo
05-22-2007, 05:49 PM
the 'WIAW' thread is not always the best representation of how good a tracker is....TL is a great tracker, one of the best in my opinion and its only a level 2 or 3....just because their not hard to get doesn't mean that a site isn't good
Don't take the traders their illusion
Don't take the traders their illusion
uh?
KFlint
05-22-2007, 06:04 PM
edit
Patriot foreve
05-22-2007, 06:25 PM
the 'WIAW' thread is not always the best representation of how good a tracker is....TL is a great tracker, one of the best in my opinion and its only a level 2 or 3....just because their not hard to get doesn't mean that a site isn't good
well,why everyone just looks on the rarity ranking and don't just notice the second ranking regarding (content+speed+pre times) which should be where most of us look ,TL is ranked as 9 in that ranking
The rarity of the tracker doesn't mean that's the best but its' content,community,speeds,pre times and others should be what matters in the first place
The Second ranking which is present doesn't take the rarity in consideration and that's the point of having double rankings in the thread ;)
Pluto
05-22-2007, 08:11 PM
SCN is shaping up to be a great tracker. RTS on the other hand sucks. Open signups are a poor idea, you get all sorts of losers that way. If you cant find an invite their then you dont deserve to be their. SCN reminds me ftn when it was trying to make it in the world of torrent site bonanza. And SCN has got freeleech w00t w00t
RTS is worthless they have horrible speeds and a community of fucking noobs.
jaqozo
05-22-2007, 08:41 PM
SCN is shaping up to be a great tracker. RTS on the other hand sucks. Open signups are a poor idea, you get all sorts of losers that way. If you cant find an invite their then you dont deserve to be their. SCN reminds me ftn when it was trying to make it in the world of torrent site bonanza. And SCN has got freeleech w00t w00t
RTS is worthless they have horrible speeds and a community of fucking noobs.
I wish I could give you a reputation point :thumbsup:
moquilok
05-22-2007, 10:14 PM
I signed up to RTS to see what the fuss was about, and it's pretty dead in there. I know it's still new and all, but it doesn't look very promising to me. Unfortunately, I don't have access to SCN to compare.
DaMan05
05-23-2007, 12:19 AM
RTS opened sign ups?... i wouldnt no cuz i parked my account and have left it.
AkaiDoresu
05-23-2007, 12:53 AM
R*S seems to be a way behind S*N.
I think S*N will be lvl8 I the next few weeks and maybe lvl10 later on because the idea of the whole site is just amazing.
well,why everyone just looks on the rarity ranking and don't just notice the second ranking regarding (content+speed+pre times) which should be where most of us look ,TL is ranked as 9 in that ranking
The rarity of the tracker doesn't mean that's the best but its' content,community,speeds,pre times and others should be what matters in the first place
The Second ranking which is present doesn't take the rarity in consideration and that's the point of having double rankings in the thread ;)
I understand what your saying, but the only ranking anyone really cares about around here is the rarity ranking, regardless of whether or not there is a two part ranking system. You don't see TL get traded for anything, people just give it away for free - which I think ends up being good for the tracker, more people = more seeds = better community as a whole.
saulin
05-23-2007, 01:47 AM
Patriot I think there should be only 1 Ranking. Overal quality ranking. Speed/content/pre times.
It's just stupid seeing people trade 5 good trackers for a shitty tracker because of rarity. The whole rarity rating needs to go and all those good trackers not even on the list should be added too. Then we really can have a list of good trackers.
People use the rarity rating just to obtain well buffered accounts on good trackers and leech them dry.
DaMan05
05-23-2007, 01:57 AM
Patriot I think there should be only 1 Ranking. Overal quality ranking. Speed/content/pre times.
It's just stupid seeing people trade 5 good trackers for a shitty tracker because of rarity. The whole rarity rating needs to go and all those good trackers not even on the list should be added too. Then we really can have a list of good trackers.
People use the rarity rating just to obtain well buffered accounts on good trackers and leech them dry.
i concur... lol...
lol... whered jaqozo and r4cc00n's argument go... :whistling
xbawksz
05-23-2007, 08:36 PM
Patriot I think there should be only 1 Ranking. Overal quality ranking. Speed/content/pre times.
It's just stupid seeing people trade 5 good trackers for a shitty tracker because of rarity. The whole rarity rating needs to go and all those good trackers not even on the list should be added too. Then we really can have a list of good trackers.
People use the rarity rating just to obtain well buffered accounts on good trackers and leech them dry.
So then people will flood the forums with posts like. "WILL TRADE ST OR DEMONOID FOR UK-T"
The current system is fine.
DaMan05
05-23-2007, 09:27 PM
Demonoid!!!!
level 10?? have you all gone mad?
i was offered invites to both rts and scn, they may not open registrations but obtaining an invite is pretty easy, of course it will get harder in the future.
i think rarity wise they are both level 4.
content wise rts should be 5 and scn should be 8
mbucari1
05-23-2007, 09:43 PM
Demonoid!!!!
Almost always find what you're looking for.
thelevy23
05-23-2007, 09:53 PM
Demonoid!!!!
Almost always find what you're looking for.
but what about the speed???
WHRST
05-23-2007, 09:58 PM
Almost always find what you're looking for.
but what about the speed???
the speed is not so good
magicrabbit
05-24-2007, 06:19 AM
You guys do know that when you say level 10 you are assuming that a new site that was giving out free invites days ago is going to become extremely hard to get. Its rarity has nothing to do with how good it is so about now id say we are a level 2 at most
r9batista
05-24-2007, 09:01 AM
I think RTS will be lvl 6...
And SCN has the potential to be the next SCT, so I think it'll be lvl 8.
:rolleyes:
Yes its true and I hope so :D
monk3y
05-24-2007, 09:27 AM
I think RTS will be lvl 6...
And SCN has the potential to be the next SCT, so I think it'll be lvl 8.
:rolleyes:
Yes its true and I hope so :D
i don't think so, rts will be level 4-5 ( there are only 826 users registered and almost every user can get invites, most of the files have few seeders )
and scn will open with level 6 because it's still pretty easy to get there are a lot of open spots and many users have invites.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.